Re: [asterisk-dev] ast_sip_session

2016-11-15 Thread Kelvin Chua
Forgot to clarify, I am also trying to pass some headers on response, i.e 180, 183 Kelvin Chua On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Kelvin Chua wrote: > thanks for the insights, i'm doing this as a proof of concept. > i relaized there are a lot of things which is a blocker by

Re: [asterisk-dev] ast_sip_session

2016-11-15 Thread Kelvin Chua
thanks for the insights, i'm doing this as a proof of concept. i relaized there are a lot of things which is a blocker by design. what i initially tried is to get the bridged channel (of course this could pose a problem when in multiples) ast_channel_bridge_peer(session->channel) then found out

Re: [asterisk-dev] ast_sip_session

2016-11-15 Thread Matthew Jordan
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 6:17 AM, Joshua Colp wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016, at 03:46 AM, Kelvin Chua wrote: > > playing around chan_pjsip/res_pjsip > > > > i have some data i want to pass from upstream to downstream on reponse > > for > > example, P-Associated-URI > > > > i

Re: [asterisk-dev] ast_sip_session

2016-11-15 Thread Joshua Colp
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016, at 03:46 AM, Kelvin Chua wrote: > playing around chan_pjsip/res_pjsip > > i have some data i want to pass from upstream to downstream on reponse > for > example, P-Associated-URI > > i figured that datastore on ast_sip_session only handles either the > upstream channel or