Re: [asterisk-dev] Possible change to the AMI PJSIPShowRegistrationsInbound command

2016-12-07 Thread George Joseph
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 8:34 AM, George Joseph wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Matthew Jordan wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Matt Fredrickson >> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Joshua Colp

Re: [asterisk-dev] Possible change to the AMI PJSIPShowRegistrationsInbound command

2016-12-07 Thread George Joseph
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Matthew Jordan wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Matt Fredrickson > wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: >> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016, at 10:43 AM, George Joseph wrote:

Re: [asterisk-dev] Possible change to the AMI PJSIPShowRegistrationsInbound command

2016-12-07 Thread Matthew Jordan
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Matt Fredrickson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016, at 10:43 AM, George Joseph wrote: > >> We just discovered that the PJSIPShowRegistrationsInbound command really > >> only

Re: [asterisk-dev] Possible change to the AMI PJSIPShowRegistrationsInbound command

2016-12-06 Thread Matt Fredrickson
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016, at 10:43 AM, George Joseph wrote: >> We just discovered that the PJSIPShowRegistrationsInbound command really >> only dumps all aors regardless of whether there's an inbound registration >> associated

Re: [asterisk-dev] Possible change to the AMI PJSIPShowRegistrationsInbound command

2016-12-06 Thread Joshua Colp
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016, at 10:43 AM, George Joseph wrote: > We just discovered that the PJSIPShowRegistrationsInbound command really > only dumps all aors regardless of whether there's an inbound registration > associated with it or not. Fixing this would mean a change to what this > command returns

Re: [asterisk-dev] Possible change to the AMI PJSIPShowRegistrationsInbound command

2016-12-06 Thread George Joseph
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Dan Jenkins wrote: > > >> I'd go with Option 1 - although it feels wrong breaking something > (regardless as to whether it was already broken) within a minor/patch > release. > > In theory people should be reading release notes but I fall

Re: [asterisk-dev] Possible change to the AMI PJSIPShowRegistrationsInbound command

2016-12-06 Thread Dan Jenkins
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 2:43 PM, George Joseph wrote: > We just discovered that the PJSIPShowRegistrationsInbound command really > only dumps all aors regardless of whether there's an inbound registration > associated with it or not. Fixing this would mean a change to what

[asterisk-dev] Possible change to the AMI PJSIPShowRegistrationsInbound command

2016-12-06 Thread George Joseph
We just discovered that the PJSIPShowRegistrationsInbound command really only dumps all aors regardless of whether there's an inbound registration associated with it or not. Fixing this would mean a change to what this command returns so I'm trying to get some feedback. There are 2 solution