2016-11-12 0:45 GMT+01:00 Joshua Colp :
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016, at 07:36 PM, Lorenzo Miniero wrote:
>
>
>
> > > >
> > > > As a side note, I anticipated the code is ugly in its current form,
> and I
> > > > haven't checked if there can be leaks as it is. I've been away from
> >
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016, at 07:36 PM, Lorenzo Miniero wrote:
> > >
> > > As a side note, I anticipated the code is ugly in its current form, and I
> > > haven't checked if there can be leaks as it is. I've been away from
> > > Asterisk coding for a while, so fresh eyes can probably help spot
2016-11-11 15:19 GMT+01:00 Joshua Colp :
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016, at 10:09 AM, Lorenzo Miniero wrote:
>
>
>
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I just completed a tentative patch that implements what we discussed. You
> > can find it attached (assuming mailman doesn't strip it), and I used
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016, at 10:09 AM, Lorenzo Miniero wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I just completed a tentative patch that implements what we discussed. You
> can find it attached (assuming mailman doesn't strip it), and I used the
> Asterisk 14.1.2 as a basis if you want to try it. Can you give a
2016-11-07 16:31 GMT+01:00 Lorenzo Miniero :
> 2016-11-07 16:17 GMT+01:00 Joshua Colp :
>
>> Lorenzo Miniero wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> apologies if this has been discussed before, but I couldn't find
>>> anything in the recent months on this group so I
2016-11-07 16:20 GMT+01:00 Olle E. Johansson :
> Let’s extend this “how to communicate with a codec” discussion and add the
> need for feedback
> on silence. I think there’s an old mail from Matt Jordan touching this
> earlier. My code for silence suppression
> and comfort noise
2016-11-07 16:17 GMT+01:00 Joshua Colp :
> Lorenzo Miniero wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> apologies if this has been discussed before, but I couldn't find
>> anything in the recent months on this group so I thought I'd write anyway.
>>
>> As a few others, I believe, I have been
Let’s extend this “how to communicate with a codec” discussion and add the need
for feedback
on silence. I think there’s an old mail from Matt Jordan touching this earlier.
My code for silence suppression
and comfort noise adds un-needed transcoding and needed a way for a codec to
communicate
Lorenzo Miniero wrote:
Hi all,
apologies if this has been discussed before, but I couldn't find
anything in the recent months on this group so I thought I'd write anyway.
As a few others, I believe, I have been trying to find a way to make
codec modules more aware of what's happening on the
2016-11-04 11:28 GMT+01:00 Lorenzo Miniero :
> Hi all,
>
> apologies if this has been discussed before, but I couldn't find anything
> in the recent months on this group so I thought I'd write anyway.
>
> As a few others, I believe, I have been trying to find a way to make
Hi all,
apologies if this has been discussed before, but I couldn't find anything
in the recent months on this group so I thought I'd write anyway.
As a few others, I believe, I have been trying to find a way to make codec
modules more aware of what's happening on the wire. In particular, the
11 matches
Mail list logo