On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Joshua Colp jc...@digium.com wrote:
George Joseph wrote:
Just FYI... I've got a whole bunch of pjsip cli stuff waiting on this
patch to be committed. Any chance of this happening this week?
It'll get reviewed today and pending any other findings arising
://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3043/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http
://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3043/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http
403390
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3043/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE
This continues a conversation kharwell, mjordan and I were having on irc
this morning concerning the implementation of the cli output formatting.
Basically, I'm thinking that while we should absolutely re-use the
underlying plumbing ( we don't need 2 versions of ast_sip_for_each_contact,
for
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Kevin Harwell kharw...@digium.com wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 14:21 -0700, George Joseph wrote:
This continues a conversation kharwell, mjordan and I were having on
irc this morning concerning the implementation of the cli output
formatting.
Basically
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Kevin Harwell kharw...@digium.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:09 PM, George Joseph george.jos...@fairview5.com
wrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Kevin Harwell kharw...@digium.comwrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 14:21 -0700, George Joseph wrote:
snip
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Kevin Harwell kharw...@digium.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 11:27 PM, George Joseph
george.jos...@fairview5.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Kevin Harwell kharw...@digium.comwrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:09 PM, George Joseph
george.jos
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Kevin Harwell kharw...@digium.com wrote:
On Sat, 2013-12-07 at 09:20 -0700, George Joseph wrote:
snip
It would be nice if endpoint stored all its object relationships the
same way but it doesn't. It stores its related aors as a comma
separated string
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Kevin Harwell kharw...@digium.com wrote:
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 09:17 -0700, George Joseph wrote:
If Asterisk were completely OO we could create object factories,
interfaces and implementation classes that hide all of that.
Unfortunately, it's not. Also
,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
, 6:18 p.m., George Joseph wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3074/
---
(Updated Dec. 16, 2013, 6:18 p.m
branches/1.8/configure 404041
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3075/diff/
Testing
---
Tested configure, compile and basic lua run time with both lua 5.1 and lua 5.2
on Fedora 19 and Fedora 20 respectively.
Thanks,
George Joseph
---
This patch has been in my production systems since July 2012.
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update
-write out a '\' when we write out the config.
George Joseph wrote:
Hmmm. So the client would write a correctly escaped '\;', the 1724 patch
would strip the backslash, then something later on would write it back again?
How would 'something' tell the difference between a ';' that was escaped
the combinations of actions and objects and made sure at
least the correct objects are returned, there are no segfaults, errors, etc.
I *think* the formatting is correct but I'll need some feedback.
Thanks,
George Joseph
need some feedback.
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo
---
On Dec. 19, 2013, 9:24 p.m., George Joseph wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3043
The *sum tools will test all lines in a checksum file and will return 0 if
any match or 1 if none match.
md5sum --quiet -c xxx.asc xxx.tar.gz
sha1sum --quiet -c xxx.asc xxx.tar.gz
sha256sum --quiet -c xxx.asc xxx.tar.gz
where xxx.asc is
.
On 22 December 2013 16:11, George Joseph george.jos...@fairview5.comwrote:
The *sum tools will test all lines in a checksum file and will return 0
if any match or 1 if none match.
md5sum --quiet -c xxx.asc xxx.tar.gz
sha1sum --quiet -c xxx.asc xxx.tar.gz
sha256sum --quiet -c xxx.asc
mimic some of the safe_asterisk settings...
Nice=0
UMask=0002
LimitCORE=infinity
LimitNOFILE=4096
Restart=always
RestartSec=4
- George Joseph
On Dec. 24, 2013, 9:49 a.m., Tzafrir Cohen wrote
On Jan. 1, 2014, 9:43 a.m., George Joseph wrote:
One other thing to consider... Unless /etc/asterisk is the working directory
(which it shouldn't be), the LUA_PATH is going to need to be set or asterisk
won't resolve lua script locations correctly. I handle this like so
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Oron Peled oron.pe...@xorcom.com wrote:
On Wednesday 01 January 2014 10:23:01 Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
I looked into running Asterisk as non-root. But I can't find a way
to get systemd to generate /var/run/asterisk as a writable directory to
the service.
I
branches/12/res/res_pjsip/config_auth.c 405000
branches/12/include/asterisk/res_pjsip_cli.h 405000
branches/12/include/asterisk/res_pjsip.h 405000
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3104/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
George Joseph
and Fedora 20 respectively.
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo
---
I've gone through all the combinations of actions and objects and made sure at
least the correct objects are returned, there are no segfaults, errors, etc.
I *think* the formatting is correct but I'll need some feedback.
Thanks,
George Joseph
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3104/#review10595
---
On Jan. 6, 2014, 2:49 p.m., George Joseph wrote
---
On Jan. 6, 2014, 2:49 p.m., George Joseph wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3104
---
On Jan. 6, 2014, 2:49 p.m., George Joseph wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3104
/config_domain_aliases.c 405643
branches/12/res/res_pjsip/config_auth.c 405643
branches/12/include/asterisk/res_pjsip_cli.h 405643
branches/12/include/asterisk/res_pjsip.h 405643
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3104/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
George Joseph
a test for disallow
in the generic ast_sip_cli_print_sorcery_objset and given the meaning of
disallow, the ! doesn't really make sense. It actually negates the
disallow. :)
- George Joseph
On Jan. 17, 2014, 3:46 p.m., Scott Griepentrog wrote
On Jan. 17, 2014, 4:46 p.m., George Joseph wrote:
Not sure this is a good idea. First, I wouldn't hardcode a test for
disallow in the generic ast_sip_cli_print_sorcery_objset and given the
meaning of disallow, the ! doesn't really make sense. It actually
negates the disallow
On Jan. 17, 2014, 4:46 p.m., George Joseph wrote:
Not sure this is a good idea. First, I wouldn't hardcode a test for
disallow in the generic ast_sip_cli_print_sorcery_objset and given the
meaning of disallow, the ! doesn't really make sense. It actually
negates the disallow
.
Diffs
-
branches/12/res/res_pjsip/pjsip_configuration.c 405922
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3143/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api
On Jan. 17, 2014, 4:46 p.m., George Joseph wrote:
Not sure this is a good idea. First, I wouldn't hardcode a test for
disallow in the generic ast_sip_cli_print_sorcery_objset and given the
meaning of disallow, the ! doesn't really make sense. It actually
negates the disallow
branches/12/res/res_pjsip/config_domain_aliases.c 406802
branches/12/res/res_pjsip/config_auth.c 406802
branches/12/include/asterisk/res_pjsip_cli.h 406802
branches/12/include/asterisk/res_pjsip.h 406802
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3104/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
George
As I was playing around with TOS/COS in pjsip last week I noticed some
inconsistencies that I'd like to correct...
There's a 'tos' parameter on the transport object but not only does it
actually set DSCP instead of TOS, it sets it in pjproject only and
therefore for signalling only.
There are
.
- George Joseph
On Feb. 3, 2014, 1:18 p.m., Scott Griepentrog wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3136
when res_pjsip was reloaded.
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman
was reloaded.
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk
and if not null, calls
ast_sip_auth_array_destroy before initializing the array with the new values.
Diffs
-
branches/12/res/res_pjsip/pjsip_configuration.c 405922
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3143/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
George Joseph
.
Made sure that config_system was properly marked as 'not reloadable' and that
it was maintaining it's original values when res_pjsip was reloaded.
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api
]
START /main/sorcery/ - open
END/main/sorcery/ - open Time: 1ms Result: PASS
START /main/sorcery/ - wizard_registration
END/main/sorcery/ - wizard_registration Time: 1ms Result: PASS
43 Test(s) Executed 43 Passed 0 Failed
Thanks,
George Joseph
---
On Feb. 6, 2014, 12:55 p.m., George Joseph wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3184
END/main/sorcery/ - open Time: 1ms Result: PASS
START /main/sorcery/ - wizard_registration
END/main/sorcery/ - wizard_registration Time: 1ms Result: PASS
43 Test(s) Executed 43 Passed 0 Failed
Thanks,
George Joseph
.
- George
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3184/#review10799
---
On Feb. 6, 2014, 1:07 p.m., George Joseph wrote
it to the instances container. Everyone else will search the instances
container for the object to get a reference.
George Joseph wrote:
There's no concept of weak references so when the sorcery instance is
linked to the registry container, the refcount gets bumped without the actual
/config_domain_aliases.c 406802
branches/12/res/res_pjsip/config_auth.c 406802
branches/12/include/asterisk/res_pjsip_cli.h 406802
branches/12/include/asterisk/res_pjsip.h 406802
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3104/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
George Joseph
/sorcery/ - open Time: 1ms Result: PASS
START /main/sorcery/ - wizard_registration
END/main/sorcery/ - wizard_registration Time: 1ms Result: PASS
43 Test(s) Executed 43 Passed 0 Failed
Thanks,
George Joseph
: PASS
[snip]
START /main/sorcery/ - open
END/main/sorcery/ - open Time: 1ms Result: PASS
START /main/sorcery/ - wizard_registration
END/main/sorcery/ - wizard_registration Time: 1ms Result: PASS
43 Test(s) Executed 43 Passed 0 Failed
Thanks,
George Joseph
/ - open Time: 1ms Result: PASS
START /main/sorcery/ - wizard_registration
END/main/sorcery/ - wizard_registration Time: 1ms Result: PASS
43 Test(s) Executed 43 Passed 0 Failed
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth
the command line.
Added the 2 calls before the error and success returns.
Diffs
-
branches/12/res/res_pjsip/pjsip_cli.c 407750
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3200/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
George Joseph
/config.c 407750
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3200/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE
that might be better left
as trunk only.
Personally, I favor options 2 and 3. If the community feels differently
though, I'm open to other approaches.
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:24 AM, George Joseph
george.jos...@fairview5.com wrote:
As I was playing around with TOS/COS in pjsip last week I
options 2 and 3. If the community feels differently
though, I'm open to other approaches.
I'd say Option 3 plus the ability to use the strings. They remove the
ambiguity of whether a number is a DSCP or TOS value.
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:24 AM, George Joseph
george.jos...@fairview5.com
counterparts.
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo
In the process of creating the dialplan function AST_SORCERY (a companion
to AST_CONFIG) I've run into an issue with how AMI interacts with sorcery
particularly related to objects that can have multiple occurrences of the
same field like contact in aor and match in identify. Take a look at the
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 5:38 AM, Joshua Colp jc...@digium.com wrote:
On 14-02-12 03:26 AM, George Joseph wrote:
In the process of creating the dialplan function AST_SORCERY (a
companion to AST_CONFIG) I've run into an issue with how AMI interacts
with sorcery particularly related
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Mark Michelson mmichel...@digium.comwrote:
Hi folks,
Yesterday afternoon, I put up https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3237/for
review, and now I'm starting to question if it's a good idea or not. I
suggest reading the full description of the proposed change,
/
Testing
---
Commands show up in help and tab completion.
Commands output the same as their list counterparts.
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev
/r/3200/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com
/sorcery/ - open Time: 1ms Result: PASS
START /main/sorcery/ - wizard_registration
END/main/sorcery/ - wizard_registration Time: 1ms Result: PASS
43 Test(s) Executed 43 Passed 0 Failed
Thanks,
George Joseph
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Frank W. Miller fr...@frankwmiller.netwrote:
Greetings,
I'm thinking of porting Asterisk to a new ARM based platform. I was
wondering if there are any gotchas I need to be aware of as I try it.
Thanks,
FM
If you're compiling natively on the ARM
--
*From:* asterisk-dev-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:
asterisk-dev-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *George Joseph
*Sent:* Friday, February 21, 2014 8:43 AM
*To:* Asterisk Developers Mailing List
*Subject:* Re: [asterisk-dev] Asterisk platform
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:12 AM
one was failing before any changes. Not sure why.
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http
]
Tests: 66 Passed: 65 Failed: 1
FAILED: tests/channels/pjsip/hold/run-test
The failed one was failing before any changes. Not sure why.
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation
---
On Feb. 27, 2014, 2:45 p.m., George Joseph wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3254
]
Tests: 66 Passed: 65 Failed: 1
FAILED: tests/channels/pjsip/hold/run-test
The failed one was failing before any changes. Not sure why.
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth
On Feb. 27, 2014, 10:59 a.m., opticron wrote:
branches/12/main/sorcery.c, lines 1101-
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3254/diff/1/?file=54398#file54398line1101
Why not use the newly created ast_variable_list_append() here?
George Joseph wrote:
ast_variable_list_append
: 66 Passed: 65 Failed: 1
FAILED: tests/channels/pjsip/hold/run-test
The failed one was failing before any changes. Not sure why.
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided
://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3283/diff/
Testing
---
Ran all 'pjsip show' and 'pjsip list' commands to make sure the output was
correct.
Ran testsuite tests/channels/pjsip/ami to make sure the AMI wasn't affected by
the buffer and self-assignment fix.
Thanks,
George Joseph
]
Tests: 66 Passed: 65 Failed: 1
FAILED: tests/channels/pjsip/hold/run-test
The failed one was failing before any changes. Not sure why.
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth
. Looking forward to phase 2!
- George Joseph
On March 5, 2014, 1:19 p.m., Jonathan Rose wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3304
by
the buffer and self-assignment fix.
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman
]
Tests: 66 Passed: 65 Failed: 1
FAILED: tests/channels/pjsip/hold/run-test
The failed one was failing before any changes. Not sure why.
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth
tests/channels/pjsip/ami to make sure the AMI wasn't affected by
the buffer and self-assignment fix.
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3317/#comment20790
The formatting now runs long by 2 characters. I'd make the space between
cos and dscp only 1 character and adjust the format below to match.
- George Joseph
On March 7, 2014, 4:51 p.m., Jonathan Rose wrote
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3324/#review11144
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- George Joseph
On March 10, 2014, 1:04
the thrash test.
I added 7 additional unit tests specifically for the weak-ref implementation
including a performance comparison test that compares both strong and weak ref
implementations. A thrash test was also added for weak-ref.
Thanks,
George Joseph
added for weak-ref.
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo
in test_astobj2 pass including the thrash test.
I added 7 additional unit tests specifically for the weak-ref implementation
including a performance comparison test that compares both strong and weak ref
implementations. A thrash test was also added for weak-ref.
Thanks,
George Joseph
tests in test_astobj2 pass including the thrash test.
I added 7 additional unit tests specifically for the weak-ref implementation
including a performance comparison test that compares both strong and weak ref
implementations. A thrash test was also added for weak-ref.
Thanks,
George Joseph
/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman
411364
branches/12/configure UNKNOWN
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3405/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing
-
branches/12/include/asterisk/lock.h 411364
branches/12/include/asterisk/autoconfig.h.in 411364
branches/12/configure.ac 411364
branches/12/configure UNKNOWN
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3405/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
George Joseph
/configure UNKNOWN
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3405/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Kevin Harwell kharw...@digium.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
Moving Asterisk to git has been talked about for some time now.
However, before doing that we thought it might be easier to move the
Asterisk test suite over first.
The current plan is to keep
branches/12/configure.ac 412327
branches/12/configure UNKNOWN
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3405/diff/
Testing (updated)
---
See above.
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http
/include/asterisk/autoconfig.h.in 412427
branches/12/configure.ac 412427
branches/12/configure UNKNOWN
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3405/diff/
Testing
---
See above.
Thanks,
George Joseph
/autoconfig.h.in 412427
branches/12/configure.ac 412427
branches/12/configure UNKNOWN
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3405/diff/
Testing
---
See above.
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided
---
On April 18, 2014, 5:09 p.m., George Joseph wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3405/
---
(Updated
branches/12/configure.ac 412427
branches/12/configure UNKNOWN
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3405/diff/
Testing
---
See above.
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3405/#review11714
---
On April 19, 2014, 10:57 a.m., George Joseph wrote
412900
branches/12/configure.ac 412900
branches/12/configure UNKNOWN
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3405/diff/
Testing
---
See above.
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3405/#review11716
---
On April 22, 2014, 12:35 p.m., George Joseph wrote
412900
branches/12/configure.ac 412900
branches/12/configure UNKNOWN
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3405/diff/
Testing
---
See above.
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided
/include/asterisk/autoconfig.h.in 412900
branches/12/configure.ac 412900
branches/12/configure UNKNOWN
Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3405/diff/
Testing
---
See above.
Thanks,
George Joseph
is a little more challenging but I at least made sure that all
the test that passed before the change still passed after the change.
Thanks,
George Joseph
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Dennis Guse dennis.g...@qu.tu-berlin.dewrote:
Hi,
using the pbx_lua module for almost everything we have found a little
annoying bug. On Asterisk startup the module is loaded - however the
configuration (extensions.lua) is not loaded and therefore the
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Kevin Harwell kharw...@digium.com wrote:
Greetings,
For a task I have been working on in Asterisk I have found myself
needing to parse URIs. Luckily, Asterisk is already using such a
library [1], albeit limitedly. As the library also may not be installed
1 - 100 of 828 matches
Mail list logo
