> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Damon Estep
> > >
> >
> > IIRC this is partially incorrect. Asterisk only supports unattended
> > transfers when using the POUND transfer feature. If you are using an
> IAXy
> > or
> >
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Michael George wrote:
> The only difference to my extensions.conf file is that if I have:
> exten => s,2,DISA(no-password, disa)
.
.
> -- Executing DISA("IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/6", "no-password| disa") in new
> stack
> Nov 9 19:50:33 DEBUG[14521]: app_disa.c:160 disa_exe
Hello Group,
I want to configure my Asterisk Server As a SIP is there any
possibality.How i do that.Any help is highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Adnan .
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/list
Hi,
Anyone get this script to work with a cisco phone. I cant
find much info on the script. I got it to run but all I see
is a directory list with no phone status.
I took a guess on the format of the file
internal_directory.csv ...
If anyone can look at my configs and let me know what I am
doing
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 00:29:53 -0500, Karl Brose wrote...
> I am not surprised. The pedantic options has a bunch of unrelated
> fixups for specific situations lumped together for whatever strange reasons.
> You should probably edit the source code (channels/chan_sip.c) find
> the line where the p
My Telco swears that I have Caller ID (Name and
Number) being sent to me over our PRI's (I have called them a half dozen times
to confirm). My gut feeling is that they are lying to me, this is
why.
First I decided to Look into my CDR records, they
all look like this for incomming calls fr
Hi,
Sometimes I see in a context "NoOp"
What is the purpose of "NoOp" (no operation) if it does nothing?
Exactly that. Doing nothing :)
btw, noop could be a placeholder for future instructions,
or if you need to delete an application from the dialplan,
saves you from renumbering the priorities.
Or
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Kuniyoshi Murata wrote:
> http://www.pcphoneline.com/skype
>
> If I have a spare PC-AT running Windows 2000/XP and use their devices to
> convert skype's input and output to conventional phone jack, I guess I can
> connect that to Asterisk and skype can be one of the channe
> Calls from BroadVoice will end up in the 'broadvoice' context in
> extensions.conf.? You will need to add an entry for your own phone
> number in the context and direct that to whatever device you want:
>
> [broadvoice]
> exten => 8165551212,1,Dial(SIP/100|30)
&g
After installing the Broadvoice Patch I am now getting repeated console
Notice messages as below. As I haven't changed any parameters in the
logger.conf file I am not sure why I am seeing these messages after the
patch. Could anyone offer a suggestion as to why I am seeing these
notices?
Thanks
Because Asterisk expects voltage to be removed from the line to indicate
that the call has been disconnected. No PBX that I know of provides
that. They just provide a busy signal tone. PBX's tend to be pretty
good about figureing out when a call has disconnected. There's a MUCH
better chanc
Just a quick FYI for the Aastra/Sayson 480i SIP phone
Just received one and now have it running with *.
- Basic phone functions work very well, but have not attempted
anything greater then basic functions.
- If no power over ethernet, then will need their brick (about the
size of two pa
I am not surprised. The pedantic options has a bunch of unrelated
fixups for specific situations lumped together for whatever strange reasons.
You should probably edit the source code (channels/chan_sip.c) find the
line where the procedure 'url_decode' is called (there is only one
instance) and
Excellent news :)
We will be hooking up our system to a number of PABX's over the next
few months, of which I expect a lot of them to be pre stone age. Is
hooking it up this way preferable to using an FXO module? I can see
there is a cost advantage as a lot of these systems are maxed out or
not a
Nick Cobley wrote:
I have a need to connect up asterisk to an Exicom GSX 418/816, this
will be a very simple setup, just one extension on the Asterisk box so
only one line to the PABX required.
Problem lies in the Exicom being a Key system and and we cannot source
any Single Line Modules for this s
I have a need to connect up asterisk to an Exicom GSX 418/816, this
will be a very simple setup, just one extension on the Asterisk box so
only one line to the PABX required.
Problem lies in the Exicom being a Key system and and we cannot source
any Single Line Modules for this system to allow me
Richard wrote:
Hi,
I have some stall calls in *. Is there any command to clear the call?
1. Yes, in the console type soft hangup and then press the tab key to
auto complete to the channel you want.
2. Usually the only need for this is incorrect set-up of
indications.conf etc. Do you want to ch
On Wednesday 10 November 2004 09:35 pm, Tom Lahti wrote:
> At 02:39 PM 11/10/2004, you wrote:
> > >In any case, the patch has been positively identified as being genuine.
> >
> >Which one? Anyone who got an email like that?
> >
> >Get the point? :)
>
> Holy beating a dead horse, Batman.
To some it
Sathya Weerasooriya wrote:
Hi,
I cannot receive any calls via icoonect. I can make outgoing calls, and also
I can see sipauth.deltathree.com registering me correctly (I am on public
internet). When I try calling-in I wouldn't even get an invite my way. I
then hookup a grandstream ata and without a
At 02:39 PM 11/10/2004, you wrote:
>In any case, the patch has been positively identified as being genuine.
Which one? Anyone who got an email like that?
Get the point? :)
Holy beating a dead horse, Batman.
No one is suggesting that because person X read and understood the patch
that it makes it a
On Wednesday 10 November 2004 07:37 pm, Michael Giagnocavo wrote:
> >Which once again brings home the fact that too few people understand
> >security
> >in the first place.
>
> Damn straight. Check out the replies on that thread.
>
> >It's like my posting about a security list. I was wondering if a
one other question:
What kind of power supply do you have in the AMD system? On my 2466, I had
alot of problems until I upgraded my power supply to a high quality 500W
unit. I seem to remember a while back reading that AMD systems were much
more sensitive to power issues that comparable Pentiu
Steve,
My asterisk server is on public internet, since applying this patch I see my
asterisk is sending re registration requests every 14 seconds.
Nov 10 18:14:30 NOTICE[1089948224]: chan_sip.c:4023 sip_reregister:--
Re-registration for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nov 10 18:14:30 NOTICE[1089948224]: c
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Dossey
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 8:24 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] External call initiation
On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 18:
Got it, that was it. Thank you so much Adam.
For those searching, here's the solution:
vi /usr/src/linux-2.6/Makefile
Remove the word 'custom' from the version information.
If you've been following along at home, you'll need to `make clean` in
the kernel source directory. Then, `make prepare-all
Thank you, Adam. I think I see how to do that ( the kernel Makefile has
that version information. So either I just change that and recompile
zap, or I have to recompile the kernel AND zap. As long as it works,
I'm happy ).
Question: I can force the zaptel module to load, but I can't force th
This appears to be a module version mismatch. Notice that the kernel is
linux-2.6.8-1.521 but the modules are 2.6.8-1.521custom. This means you
need to remake your modules or your kernel to get them to match. Also,
you should try rebuilding the kernel with preemption turned off. It
helps a
Hi folks, start to finish, this is what I did:
cd /usr/src/linux-2.6.8-1.521
make prepare-all
cd ..
wget http://www.asterisk.org/zaptel-1.0.0.tar.gz
tar xfsz zaptel-1.0.0.tar.gz
cd zaptel-1.0.0
less README
less README.Linux26 ( see, I really did RTFM ;) )
ln -s /usr/src/linux-2.6.8-1.521 /usr/src/
Any word on when/if this patch will make CVS HEAD? I'd rather wait until
then if at all possible.
-- Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Sokol
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 5:08 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commer
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Nathan Bowyer wrote:
> I have a problem which I've found quite strange, to say the least. I
> have a client who uses long distance access codes from their LD
> provider. The codes are 4-digits, nothing extraordinary there. The
> problem is, if you dial the digits quickly, w
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 15:53:12 -0500, I wrote
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 14:36:04 -0500, Karl Brose wrote...
>
> > Try turning on pedantic mode in sip.conf
> > pedantic=yes
>
> That fixed it! :)
It turns out that pedantic=yes fixed the X-Lite issue, but *broke* outgoing
calls from my VoicePulse Open
> Hello,
>
> I've had a Tyan dual Athlon MP(2800) machine for a year now and have had
> several lockups for strange reasons on stock redhat kernel and on custom
> compiled kernel off of Slackware. I've tried every combination of BIOS
> settings and changed out all assiciated hardware and found the
Please forgive this newbie question - I'm new both to Asterisk and to
telephony.
I have a single digium fxo/fxs card with an analog phone connected to it. I
have a single Uniden uip200 phone as well. I can dial the sip phone from the
analog phone and it works fine. When I dial the analog phone fro
Hello,
I have a problem which I've found quite strange, to say the least. I
have a client who uses long distance access codes from their LD
provider. The codes are 4-digits, nothing extraordinary there. The
problem is, if you dial the digits quickly, without pauses inbetween
them, the LD compan
On Wednesday 10 November 2004 05:25 pm, Tim Jackson wrote:
> >From my experience the Tyan Tiger MPX is a great board. I've never used
>
> it with *, but I have been using it as a high volume samba server for
> over a year and its never even hicupped.
>
> 16:24:30 up 197 days, 20:45, 2 users, load
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian
> Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 3:41 PM
> To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] non blind call transfers
>
>
>
> > --
On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 15:15 -0700, Jeff Pratt wrote:
> Hello All,
> [open]
> exten => s,1,Wait(1)
> exten => s,2,Answer
> exten => s,3,MP3Player(/var/lib/asterisk/sounds/P73_hoho.mp3)
> exten => s,4,Flash()
> exten => s,5,SendDTMF(1300)
> exten => s,6,Hangup
>
>
> [closed]
> exten => s,1,Wait(1)
On November 10, 2004 04:12 pm, Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists wrote:
> I don't think it is a good idea to swamp the list with "does my modem
> work with Asterisk" messages. I fear that some people are soon going
> to become very angry if this trend continues.
While your message is a good one:
Hi,
I'm having a problem with callerid. It is recieved fine by the fxo (it
appears in the cdr, and voicemail app gets it fine), but it is passed to
the internal phones works about 25% of the time.
The internal phones are all analog, a dvg-1120M (mgcp firmware) and a
quicknet phonejack.
There seems
Martin List-Petersen wrote:
I do agree, that it is exactly the place where DUNDi is most
interesting. Peering between ITSP's and dialplan distribution inside
companies.
Won't be useful for peering unless everyone is running asterisk, most
companies tend to run other devices for better stability/tim
I posted this last night but I am going to reword it. I currently use
AgentcallBacklogin to call my cell phone. This used to work and im
unsure of when it stopped working.
What happens is when the call goes to my cell phone this is what I
see at the console:
-- IAX2/txlink/7 answered Local
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Matteo,
Brancaleoni Matteo wrote:
| Hi,
|
|
|>I'm using Asterisk-1.0.2 and voicemail linked with MySQL-4.1.7 library.
|>I realised that asterisk is loosing connection with MySQL server and
|>inform that user doesn't exist.
|>Does anyone is using Aste
>Why don't you make your disdain known to Broadvoice, rather than
>Asterisk users? To claim that someone opens a security hole by
For the same reason this was originally posted to the asterisk-user list.
>accepting a verified patch via email, is the same as claiming that you
>never have a securi
We also sometimes use a specialty block for this from Allen Tel Products. #
AT125-SM. Rather than a "punch" down it has a block of 25 rj11 (standard phone
jack) connectors and one male and one female amphenol connector. I will often
use this when I want to install an asterisk box in front of an exi
Why don't you make your disdain known to Broadvoice, rather than
Asterisk users? To claim that someone opens a security hole by
accepting a verified patch via email, is the same as claiming that you
never have a security hole just because you download from "trusted"
sites. Webservers can be hacke
>The links in an email can also be easily forged. I'm receiving several
>pishing emails from paypal and others with perfectly looking links to
>forged sites. You cannot trust email links either.
Sure, if you're using HTML email :). That's why most places tell people to
type thesite.com in the URL
Hello,
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 17:36:51 -0500, Ryan Wilkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree that sending a patch out via email blindly is not the
> appropriate method. It would have been much better to send the email
> as they did but provide a link to download the patch from the
> Broadvoice we
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Reina
> Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 3:27 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Hooking up a an Adit 600
>
> I have purchased an Adit 600 but with 6 FXS 8
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arvanitis Kostas
> Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 8:01 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] non blind call transfers
>
> On Friday 29 October 2004 23:17, lenz
>In any case, the patch has been positively identified as being genuine.
Which one? Anyone who got an email like that?
Get the point? :)
-Michael
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-user
>Sometimes I see in a context "NoOp"
>
>What is the purpose of "NoOp" (no operation) if it does nothing?
Google for: Asterisk NoOp
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+cmd+NoOp
-Michael
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://li
I agree that sending a patch out via email blindly is not the
appropriate method. It would have been much better to send the email
as they did but provide a link to download the patch from the
Broadvoice website. This would help verify the authenticity of the
patch and not cause the discussio
Sometimes I see in a context "NoOp"
What is the purpose of "NoOp" (no operation) if it does nothing?
--
#Joseph
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options v
>From my experience the Tyan Tiger MPX is a great board. I've never used
it with *, but I have been using it as a high volume samba server for
over a year and its never even hicupped.
16:24:30 up 197 days, 20:45, 2 users, load average: 0.94, 0.92, 0.89
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: [
Hello,
I've had a Tyan dual Athlon MP(2800) machine for a year now and have had
several lockups for strange reasons on stock redhat kernel and on custom
compiled kernel off of Slackware. I've tried every combination of BIOS
settings and changed out all assiciated hardware and found the problem: It
>I don't see a security issue with his method.
>
>If you (a) read the entire patch and (b) comprehend fully everything that
>it does, then there's nothing to worry about. Fear comes from the unknown,
>and if you know everything in the patch, there's nothing to fear.
I'll agree if you fully comp
Hello All,
I've got Asterisk CVS-HEAD-11/03/04-14:36:44 installed and running.
I have a TDM04B (wildcard with 4 FXO modules) using fxs_ks signalling
(I'm under the suspicion that my lines (2500 lines from a Nortel
Option11 PBX) are merely loopstart, but that's a side issue (which, if
anyone
>I can confirm that the patch is legit. Olle wrote it up last week and
>we have been testing the patch for several days. I have installed it on
>all of my Asterisk boxes and it appears to do no harm.
That's not the point. The point is distributing patches via email is a
horrible way to do patc
I can confirm that the patch is legit. Olle wrote it up last week and
we have been testing the patch for several days. I have installed it on
all of my Asterisk boxes and it appears to do no harm.
The patch is necessary because (I think I have this correct -- forgive
me if I scramble any of t
Rob McGee wrote:
On Monday 08 November 2004 15:40, I wrote:
Channel map:
Channel 01: FXO Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01)
Channel 02: FXO Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 02)
Channel 03: FXO Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 03)
Channel 04: FXO Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 04)
Channel 05: FXS Kewlstart (Def
On 2004-10-29 at 20:49, Chris A. Icide ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> The culprit is the RedHat kernel. I don't know what redhat does with their
> kernel or sources. But If you build your own kernel from non-redhat
> source, asterisk will compile perfectly.
I did as instructed and recompiled a
Hi,
how to configure * to send an SMS to an mobile phone (Germany, D2).
in extensions.conf I did insert:
[smsdial]
exten => _X.,1,SMS(default,,${EXTEN},${CALLERIDNAME})
exten => _X.,2,SMS(default)
exten => _X.,3,Hangup
In the outgoing directory I do playe an call-fil
At 01:14 PM 11/10/2004, you wrote:
>the patch is pure c code. it took me 5 mins to read & understand
>it. is very simple (but useful).
>Simply that patch (apart from adding some logs, comments
>and little code formatting) simply caches auth data
>AND let * manage 403 responses from the server,
>and
Check out your sound board specs, it has to support full duplex mode.
Denis.
Em Qua 10 Nov 2004 18:57, Volker Jahns escreveu:
> Problem to get kphone 4.05 working w/ SuSE 8.2
> --
>
> I amtrying to get asterisk running but I do get stuck at the first st
>> If you're joking, :).
>>
>> If you're serious, go read a primer on security.
>>
>> Do you patch your kernel the same way?
>
>No. I was speaking of THAT patch.
>that one is not so difficult, imho.
>
>a more difficult one, of course, must be
>understood before. or let someone that can
>do for
Hi,
> If you're joking, :).
>
> If you're serious, go read a primer on security.
>
> Do you patch your kernel the same way?
No. I was speaking of THAT patch.
that one is not so difficult, imho.
a more difficult one, of course, must be
understood before. or let someone that can
do for you.
I
Hi
I have battled my way through setting up linux,
and then installing Asterisk. I have got 90% of the way there.
Asterisk registers with my IAX provider ok, my SIP phones can send and
receive calls
to each other, and out over the network.
Voicemail is working ok.
The last thing I want is to direc
mmmh
> Simply that patch (apart from adding some logs, comments
> and little code formatting) simply caches auth data
too many "simply" here..
> so, just read it (or let someone do for it) and understand
> that's not a problem :)
or let someone do for you
too late... my english is getting wors
>the patch is pure c code. it took me 5 mins to read & understand
>it. is very simple (but useful).
>Simply that patch (apart from adding some logs, comments
>and little code formatting) simply caches auth data
>AND let * manage 403 responses from the server,
>and this last one perhaps is the issue
Hi Walter,
I don't think it is a good idea to swamp the list with "does my modem
work with Asterisk" messages. I fear that some people are soon going
to become very angry if this trend continues.
The message you should have got from recent posts on this matter is very clear:
No modems will work
Hi,
Il mer, 2004-11-10 alle 21:51, Michael Giagnocavo ha scritto:
> They send patches out by email? Who thought of this brilliant idea? "Hmm,
> let's teach our users not to be cautious."
the patch is pure c code. it took me 5 mins to read & understand
it. is very simple (but useful).
Simply that
Uh oh, I just got my patch too. I've been running * fine on 5/02 CVS
(or thereabouts). I don't stress it too much, all I really need is SIP,
IAX and a lonely little PSTN line on Zaptel. I'm too busy with a few
other projects to do due diligence right now -- any issues with getting
1.x or CVS hea
Unbundling is out.
"Commercially Negotiated Agreements" are replacing UNE's.
So, the great unbundling discount is gone.
I'm a CMRS (wireless), regulated by FCC.
I love telling the state PUC that they lack jurisdiction in certian
matters.
Incumbant LECS "have" to do certian things because they had
Problem to get kphone 4.05 working w/ SuSE 8.2
--
I amtrying to get asterisk running but I do get stuck at the first steps.
asterisk installation OK.
UA kphone 3.13 (on SuSE 9.1 system)
UA kphone 4.05 (on SuSE 8.2 system)
When connecting to the asteria
Hi,
> I'm using Asterisk-1.0.2 and voicemail linked with MySQL-4.1.7 library.
> I realised that asterisk is loosing connection with MySQL server and
> inform that user doesn't exist.
> Does anyone is using Asterisk voicemail linked with MySQL 4.1.x library?
sure. never lost a connection.
Using *
Nov 10 14:52:56 NOTICE[20579]: chan_sip.c:4041 sip_reregister:--
Re-registrm
-- Responding to challenge, registration to domain/host name
sip.broadvoicem
Nov 10 14:52:56 NOTICE[20579]: chan_sip.c:6821 handle_response: Outbound
Regist)
I got this after applying the patch. I'm guessing thi
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 14:36:04 -0500, Karl Brose wrote...
> Try turning on pedantic mode in sip.conf
> pedantic=yes
That fixed it! :)
> My X-tens only encode for the # (pound) character, not the '*'
I checked again and it is in fact just the # key that X-Lite is encoding; it's
sending * through
They send patches out by email? Who thought of this brilliant idea? "Hmm,
let's teach our users not to be cautious."
/me wonders when someone on linux is gonna install a "patch" that
compromises their system cause some email said so
-Michael
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I confirmed that asterisk patch is legitimate.
Message follows:
"This is a legitimate request.
BroadVoice Customer Care
-Original Message-
From: Bartosz Wegrzyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 3:11 PM
To: BroadVoice Support
Subject: Re: URGENT PATCH INFORMA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Folks,
I'm using Asterisk-1.0.2 and voicemail linked with MySQL-4.1.7 library.
I realised that asterisk is loosing connection with MySQL server and
inform that user doesn't exist.
Does anyone is using Asterisk voicemail linked with MySQL 4.1.x librar
I have purchased an Adit 600 but with 6 FXS 8 channel
cards. Can somone tell me where I plug analog phones
in. The cards do not have any ports on them.
Thanks
Richard
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.
www.yahoo.com
I am working as well with this patch.
Tim Jackson wrote:
I've applied the patch (after scanning over the file). No issues with *.
BV still works, too.
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan
Wilkins
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 1:59
Using Software version 10.1.0
Here's what I did:
1. Create a Media Profile (called "voip")
name* = voip
active = yes
protocol-type = sip
[in MEDIA-GATEWAY/voip:voip-options]
packet-audio-mode = g711-ulaw
frames-per-packet = 2
silence-det-cng = no
ena-adap-jitter-buffer = yes
max-jitter-buffer-s
I've applied the patch (after scanning over the file). No issues with *.
BV still works, too.
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan
Wilkins
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 1:59 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Di
whomever is the "carrier of last resort" (generally the ILEC) would
find it next to impossible to "refuse" a subscriber (someone wishing to
originate/terminate traffic)
- hcir
On Nov 10, 2004, at 10:26 AM, Thomas Eugene Hayden wrote:
Eventually, companies like Vonage are going to get shafted bec
I was just about to ask a similar question having just received the
message.
I'm more concerned about someone trying to spread a virus or something
like that. You have to admit that the URGENT, INSTALL THIS message
with an attachment pretty much screams virus, even if its not.
I tried calling
Whats the deal with this Broadvoice patch?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Just received this from broadvoice, anyone know if this patch will
become part of the CVS tree?
--
THIS PATCH MUST BE APPLIED WITHIN 5 DAYS OF RECEIVING THIS E-MAIL OR YOU
WILL RISK THE POSSIBLE SUSPENSION OF YOUR BROADVOICE SERVICE. WE
APOLOGIZE FOR ANY INCONVENIENCE THIS MAY CAU
Hello there,
I'm still new to Asterisk and until today i did not even know that
Asterisk needs a timing source for correct use of MeetMe and MOH.
So I looked after ztdummy (but I found out that I have USB-OHCI instead
of UHCI) and came finally to zaprtc
But there the trouble starts
I fetched all
Partially accurate Tom,
What is more likely to happen is that a new form of billing mediation not
dissimilar to the current long distance carriage mediation will be adopted.
ILECS will then charge "termination fees" of some sort for the last mile
access. This will likely be addressed by new regula
Try turning on pedantic mode in sip.conf
pedantic=yes
My X-tens only encode for the # (pound) character, not the '*'
Stanley Cline wrote:
Has anyone else had issues with Asterisk rejecting calls from X-Lite
softphones when the dialed number contains the * or # keys (e.g., dial #86 on
X-Lite "keyp
Hi there,
had just the same issue - I solved it by adding a line, for each SIP
client, on the sip.conf;
dtmfmode=rfc2833
And voilà
Best regards
Jorn
Stanley Cline wrote:
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:21:10 -0600, Kristian Kielhofner wrote...
X-Lite uses some sequences at the beggining of calls to spe
Hi,
I cannot receive any
calls via icoonect. I can make outgoing calls, and also I can see
sipauth.deltathree.com registering me correctly (I am on public internet). When
I try calling-in I wouldn't even get an invite my way. I then hookup a
grandstream ata and without a problem it was abl
After speaking with an employee at the Michigan Public Sevice Commission,
I'm under the impression that initially this is a good thing, but long term
a very bad thing. The FCC strictly regulates ILECs and CLECs, and requires
ILECs to unbundle their lines and let CLECs lease them at a reasonable
Wrong statement. Vonage is not officially regulated. The only decision that
was made involved taking away the right of states to regulate VoIP
and this was expected. We have a ways to go before the big word "REGULATION"
is on top of us.
Brandon
> The FCC is now the governing body for Internet b
I may be wrong but after looking around all I could find was an email about
w and p. It said w is to wait for a tone and p was for a pause. I can't find
anything to verify this.
--john
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hen
> Is there a way to put pauses in a dial string? I need * to dial a
> number then pause for 6 seconds and dial a second string of numbers.
>
>search the list.
>This question has been answered tons of time before.
>
>Matteo.
Good day,
I did search the list before I posted and found several answ
Well, it's better than having it state regulated.
-Michael
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of james
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 1:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Is this good or bad
The FCC is now the governing
The FCC is now the governing body for Internet based telephony in the U.S.
Vonage considers this a win, but now they are officially regulated.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To U
--- Walter Willis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Fecha: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:58:02 -0600 (CST)
> De: Walter Willis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Asunto: Re: [Asterisk-Users] calls go silent
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> i have GTW V.92 Modem work with asterisk?
>
>
_
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
