Re: [asterisk-users] Calls on E1 TDMoE span are dropped at random

2008-05-10 Thread Florian Hackenberger
On Friday 09 May 2008, Steve Totaro wrote: Try resetinterval=never Thank you very much for your suggestion, I'll try the setting and will report back whether it solved our problems. Cheers, Florian -- DI Florian Hackenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.hackenberger.at

[asterisk-users] G.722 for polycom

2008-05-10 Thread zhao_x_q
I have test G.722 for many phones. I have try calls between sip G.722, sip G.722 to sip G.711, G.722 to RRI cards, PRIcards to G.722. I also test meetme conference. Other phones such as grandstream and fanwei have no problems. The sounds is good, grandstreams have little difference between

Re: [asterisk-users] Calls on E1 TDMoE span are dropped at random

2008-05-10 Thread Florian Hackenberger
On Friday 09 May 2008, Steve Totaro wrote: Try resetinterval=never Hi! I tried setting resetinterval=60 and established a call. The call survived several channel resets successfully, so this setting is probably not the problem. Any more ideas? Cheers, Florian -- DI Florian

Re: [asterisk-users] Best Linux distribution to use in Asterisk server

2008-05-10 Thread Marco
Personally, I love the debian way, but I must admit that when it gets to Asterisk, I prefer to use a RedHat-based distro like CentOS, first of all for the proven reliability, then for the widely used rpm packaging system and last because there are many distro CentOS-based that provide a stable

Re: [asterisk-users] AGI - Choppy Sound

2008-05-10 Thread Dominic Son
Sometimes my process just drops the call and leaves the client in silence! it happens probably 1 out of 25 times... no meaningful loads happening, just me prototyping my (Ruby)AGI... On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Robert Norton - SophTelecom LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Marcelo, Sorry,

Re: [asterisk-users] ztdummy problems

2008-05-10 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 11:33:30PM -0500, Perssy Llamosas wrote: Hello list, I have found some strange problem with the ztdummy timing, maybe you have already have this problem before, I would appreciate some hints here or maybe I need to file a bug. First of all, some background: I

Re: [asterisk-users] app_queue New Function ToggleQueueMemberUse()

2008-05-10 Thread Patrick
On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 16:29 +0200, Benoit Plessis wrote: Benoit Plessis a écrit : Russell Bryant a écrit : Alternatively, if you would like to control the usability of an agent through the dialplan, then you could use the DEVICE_STATE() function to create a custom device state.

Re: [asterisk-users] app_queue New Function ToggleQueueMemberUse()

2008-05-10 Thread Benoit Plessis
Patrick a écrit : Can you please tell me where you found the backport? Thanks, Patrick Russel already sent the links: Yes, this is also from 1.6, but an unsupported backport of DEVICE_STATE(), exists, as well. http://www.asterisk.org/node/48325 http://www.asterisk.org/node/48360

Re: [asterisk-users] app_queue New Function ToggleQueueMemberUse()

2008-05-10 Thread Steve Totaro
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Benoit Plessis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Patrick a écrit : Can you please tell me where you found the backport? Thanks, Patrick Russel already sent the links: Yes, this is also from 1.6, but an unsupported backport of DEVICE_STATE(), exists, as well.

Re: [asterisk-users] app_queue New Function ToggleQueueMemberUse()

2008-05-10 Thread Benoit Plessis
Steve Totaro a écrit : Depending on the phone, the simplest and easiest way to handle this is to set the phone to not accept call waiting. That's not always possible, if you use IAX2 then that's not even an option (at least on the PBX side):

Re: [asterisk-users] Best Linux distribution to use in Asterisk server

2008-05-10 Thread Matt Watson
I'm a Gentoo guy myself too... but the best advice I can give is just re-hashing what others have already set... pick whatever you are the most comfortable with... and if support contracts are important to you, then that will be a factor as well. I've used most of bigger distros out there over

[asterisk-users] Fwd: Polycom Advanced Features

2008-05-10 Thread Andreas van dem Helge
Anyone have shared lines (sla.conf) working with Polycom phones? Also, has anyone figured out if its possible to do 1 button call park with the softkeys? ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing

Re: [asterisk-users] Unable to build Hpec on Zaptel 1.4.10.1

2008-05-10 Thread Andres
Andres wrote: Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 06:36:36PM -0400, Andres wrote: Hi, I just tried to upgrade from Zaptel 1.4.6 to 1.4.10.1 but it looks like the Makefile has no rules for the HPEC. make[3]: *** No rule to make target `hpec/hpec_zaptel.h', needed by

Re: [asterisk-users] Unable to build Hpec on Zaptel 1.4.10.1

2008-05-10 Thread Ruben Zamora
Andres: Did you install the hpec in /usr/zaptel/kernel/hpec ??? Thanks Ruben Andres escribió: Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 06:36:36PM -0400, Andres wrote: Hi, I just tried to upgrade from Zaptel 1.4.6 to 1.4.10.1 but it looks like the Makefile has

Re: [asterisk-users] Unable to build Hpec on Zaptel 1.4.10.1

2008-05-10 Thread Andres
Ruben Zamora wrote: Andres: Did you install the hpec in /usr/zaptel/kernel/hpec ??? I sure did. Without it there is no error as no hpec support is attempted. Andres Thanks Ruben Andres escribió: Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 06:36:36PM -0400,

Re: [asterisk-users] Unable to build Hpec on Zaptel 1.4.10.1

2008-05-10 Thread Ruben Zamora
Why you dont download zaptel branches.? svn checkout http://svn.digium.com/svn/zaptel/branches/1.4 zap-branches Andres escribió: Ruben Zamora wrote: Andres: Did you install the hpec in /usr/zaptel/kernel/hpec ??? I sure did. Without it there is no error as no hpec

Re: [asterisk-users] Unable to build Hpec on Zaptel 1.4.10.1

2008-05-10 Thread Andres
I just tried to upgrade from Zaptel 1.4.6 to 1.4.10.1 but it looks like the Makefile has no rules for the HPEC. make[3]: *** No rule to make target `hpec/hpec_zaptel.h', needed by `/usr/src/zaptel/kernel/zaptel-base.o'. Stop. Can somebody confirm this? Yes, it looks