I have a working asterisk test box that I'm rebuilding with mysql support
so that I can test cdr stats (http://www.cdr-stats.org/).
When I run 'make memuselect', I select res_config_mysql, app_mysql,
cdr_mysql, and app_saycountpl components. The build/install process goes
fine i.e. no errors.
On 12-03-06 12:05 PM, Ron Bergin wrote:
I have a working asterisk test box that I'm rebuilding with mysql support
so that I can test cdr stats (http://www.cdr-stats.org/).
When I run 'make memuselect', I select res_config_mysql, app_mysql,
cdr_mysql, and app_saycountpl components. The
- Original Message -
From: Ron Bergin r...@i.frys.com
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 6, 2012 11:05:35 AM
Subject: [asterisk-users] Compiling asterisk with mysql support
I have a working asterisk test box that I'm rebuilding with mysql
support
so that I
Paul Belanger wrote:
On 12-03-06 12:05 PM, Ron Bergin wrote:
However, I'm getting a seg fault error when
starting asterisk.
# /usr/sbin/safe_asterisk: line 145: 27014 Segmentation fault (core
dumped) nice -n $PRIORITY ${ASTSBINDIR}/asterisk -f ${CLIARGS}
${ASTARGS} /dev/${TTY} 21
Matthew Jordan wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ron Bergin r...@i.frys.com
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 6, 2012 11:05:35 AM
Subject: [asterisk-users] Compiling asterisk with mysql support
When I run 'make memuselect', I select res_config_mysql,
Matthew Jordan wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ron Bergin r...@i.frys.com
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 6, 2012 11:05:35 AM
Subject: [asterisk-users] Compiling asterisk with mysql support
I have a working asterisk test box that I'm rebuilding with
On 03/06/2012 12:31 PM, Ron Bergin wrote:
Mathew,
Each of those odbc modules are unavailable i.e., marked with XXX
I even deleted the asterisk build directory and started over, but had the
same results.
What prereqs do I need besides these:
mysql.i386
It's not a question of whether the default directory permissions are
appropriate. I agree with those.
What we're talking about here is what happens during updates to an existing
directory. I can't see any rationale for changing the group permissions.
If the group permissions differ from the
On 03/06/2012 03:44 PM, Karl Fife wrote:
It's not a question of whether the default directory permissions are
appropriate. I agree with those.
What we're talking about here is what happens during updates to an existing
directory. I can't see any rationale for changing the group permissions.
Yep. That's what's happening. I'll file a bug.
Thanks
-K
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Jason Parker jpar...@digium.com wrote:
On 03/06/2012 03:44 PM, Karl Fife wrote:
It's not a question of whether the default directory permissions are
appropriate. I agree with those.
What we're
On 06-03-12 23:03, Jason Parker wrote:
[snip]
It should only set them if the directory does not exist. If it's changing them,
something is very seriously broken.
An RPM which updates a previous version will change the user/group
permissions of any existing directory or file as it is
On 06-03-12 23:07, Karl Fife wrote:
Yep. That's what's happening. I'll file a bug.
AFAICT it's not a bug but the way RPM works.
Regards,
Patrick
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
On 03/06/2012 04:24 PM, Patrick Lists wrote:
On 06-03-12 23:07, Karl Fife wrote:
Yep. That's what's happening. I'll file a bug.
AFAICT it's not a bug but the way RPM works.
Regards,
Patrick
He didn't suggest that he was talking about RPMs. If that's the case, then I
take back
On 06-03-12 23:36, Jason Parker wrote:
On 03/06/2012 04:24 PM, Patrick Lists wrote:
On 06-03-12 23:07, Karl Fife wrote:
Yep. That's what's happening. I'll file a bug.
AFAICT it's not a bug but the way RPM works.
Regards,
Patrick
He didn't suggest that he was talking about RPMs. If
I've been logging sip registrations from this IP address for 2 days now. I've
emailed the domain's admin, but nothing seems to come of it.
I've routed him into oblivion, but still, I think 50 requests a second for 2
days is a bit much.
Any ideas?
--
Take care and have fun,
Mike Diehl.
--
On 07-03-12 01:28, Mike Diehl wrote:
I've been logging sip registrations from this IP address for 2 days now. I've
emailed the domain's admin, but nothing seems to come of it.
I've routed him into oblivion, but still, I think 50 requests a second for 2
days is a bit much.
Any ideas?
Did you
iptables -A INPUT --src 188.138.100.16 -j DROP
On Mar 6, 2012 7:29 PM, Mike Diehl mdi...@diehlnet.com wrote:
I've been logging sip registrations from this IP address for 2 days now.
I've
emailed the domain's admin, but nothing seems to come of it.
I've routed him into oblivion, but still, I
route add -host 188.138.100.16 dev lo
Good bye. But it shouldn't come to this.
On Tuesday 06 March 2012 5:48:26 pm Matt Desbiens wrote:
iptables -A INPUT --src 188.138.100.16 -j DROP
On Mar 6, 2012 7:29 PM, Mike Diehl mdi...@diehlnet.com wrote:
I've been logging sip registrations from
On Tuesday 06 March 2012 5:47:39 pm Patrick Lists wrote:
On 07-03-12 01:28, Mike Diehl wrote:
I've been logging sip registrations from this IP address for 2 days now.
I've emailed the domain's admin, but nothing seems to come of it.
I've routed him into oblivion, but still, I think 50
Have you tried fail2ban??
http://www.fail2ban.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
Saludos/Regards
--
Ing. Gerardo Barajas Puente
Proyectos Especiales/Preventa | www.neocenter.com
T:+52 (55) 8590-9000 x 7003
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Mike Diehl mdi...@diehlnet.com wrote:
I've been logging
You could traceroute the IP and contact NOC's along the route. They might
be interested to hear of flooding/DOS attacks being routed via their
equipment.
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Mike Diehl mdi...@diehlnet.com wrote:
route add -host 188.138.100.16 dev lo
Good bye. But it shouldn't
On 12-03-06 05:03 PM, Jason Parker wrote:
On 03/06/2012 03:44 PM, Karl Fife wrote:
It's not a question of whether the default directory permissions are
appropriate. I agree with those.
What we're talking about here is what happens during updates to an existing
directory. I can't see any
22 matches
Mail list logo
