How about CDR to either MySQL or cdrlite and a quickie sql query? I could have
added postgres, but I'm a DB bigot. That would work too.
On 03/22/2017 01:46 PM, Motty Cruz wrote:
Hello, I am looking for CDR reporting solution? Any suggestions? I am using
Asterisk 13.13.1
I would like a
Hello, I am looking for CDR reporting solution? Any suggestions? I am using
Asterisk 13.13.1
I would like a report on number of calls per extension.
Thanks,
Motty
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
We wrote a call screening (and CID rewrite) app for an ITSP a few years ago.
We had to use MySQL as the astDB could not keep up (* was choking – we did dig
deeper we just switched to MySQL). I don’t think astDB is the right way to go.
If you’re comfortable writing a * func then you might as
Hi Dovid,
I'm trying to get rid of my AGIs. I wrote an * func to check directly my
PG database, and then I saw that * already has a func_blacklist that will
check astDB.
I was thinking the issues I might have using astDB for it. If I do some
performance tests I get back here with the results.
I have never tested something that large but I would think it would be
slow. Why not use an age with reddis or mysql?
On Mar 22, 2017 9:32 AM, "Gabriel Ortiz Lour" wrote:
> Hi all,
> Does anyone uses astDB for a large amount of data, in special for
> implementing black
Hi all,
Does anyone uses astDB for a large amount of data, in special for
implementing black lists with millions of numbers (i'd like about 2 or 3
million)?
That would be held in memory right? Is this (memory consumption) the only
problem I could face?
Att.
Gabriel
--
Hi all,
we have a little tool that tracks Music-on-Hold events for call queues
by listening to AMI events.
This is quite useful for reporting so, as the tool is free to use and
does not depend on our QueueMetrics Call Center suite, I thought I'd
announce it in here as well.
If anyone is
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 08:54:22PM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
> I found a page that assisted in running asterisk as non-root.
>
> My question is why is the default install not more friendly in this
> manner???
It requires either creating a user or making sure such a user exists.
That's not a