Re: [asterisk-users] G729

2018-07-26 Thread Doug Lytle
>>> And I'm not at all against Digium making money. But this whole 729 thing is >>> a mystery without any official feedback... Not an official statement from Digium, but at the top of that thread, it says it all: "david551 Sep '17 It still need copyright licensing. You will need to find an

Re: [asterisk-users] G729

2018-07-26 Thread Jonathan H
Hmmm, again, this conversation has just faded out. I wondered why no response from Digium? So I found this discussion - https://community.asterisk.org/t/why-does-g729-still-require-licensing/71920/8 - seems very clear that G729 is patent free, but still no response from Digium. Also, the link to

[asterisk-users] Edit: Asterisk 13.22.0 - "stat" dialplan function clears channel vars?

2018-07-26 Thread Stefan Viljoen
Sorry, I see I have submitted a testing version of the dialplan fragment. Actual extension is: ;listen to recording exten=>,1,Answer() exten=>,n,NoOp(Requesting File ${recfile}) exten=>,n,NoOp(Rec file set to ${recfile}) exten=>,n,NoOp(Alt file set to ${altfile})

[asterisk-users] Asterisk 13.22.0 - "stat" dialplan function clears channel vars?

2018-07-26 Thread Stefan Viljoen
Hi Guys I have the following dialplan code that I use to play back recordings, the filename being provided in an originate statement to the AMI (AJAM) interface: Action: Originate ActionID: test Channel: SIP/3015 Exten: Context: local Priority: 1 CallerID: 3015 Account: recordinglisten