On Oct 30, 2005, at 1:39 AM, Ryan wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 10:58:22PM -0600, Ryan exclaimed:
snip
The problem is caused on the provider side, not in your asterisk. The
packets they are sending to your asterisk have the wrong sequence
numbers. I finished some code lastnight to *help*
Can I please get a definitive answer on this from the list...
I have read through lots of material, and I am 90% sure the answer is
no, but the occasional offhand statement has left this little
nugget of hope in my mind.
Is there any echo cancelation that I can enable or add for pure
On Oct 30, 2005, at 4:56 PM, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Sunday 30 October 2005 16:45, Dave Grey wrote:
I frequently get bad echo on IAX2/ulaw connections between my CVS
HEAD and a friend's 1.2 Beta, using analog phones connected through
IAXys on both ends. Neither PBX has a zap interface. We
On Oct 30, 2005, at 10:12 PM, Dinesh Nair wrote:
On 10/31/05 05:56 Andrew Kohlsmith said the following:
No. There is no need because IP--IP calls are what is known as
four wire circuits -- there is no mixing of the received audio
and the send audio, and thus zero need for an echo
On Oct 30, 2005, at 11:13 PM, Ryan wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 04:03:34PM -0500, Dave Grey exclaimed:
The thing about the problems I am experiencing, though, is that they
are not in connections from other * servers. I am getting this on
SIP connections from IPKall. Is it still likely
On Oct 30, 2005, at 11:21 PM, trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
I am starting a provider that gives free service
Nice! You went from listing free providers to becoming one. ;-)
I would love an invite if you could use another tester.
Either way, good luck with this and thanks for providing
On Oct 29, 2005, at 1:20 AM, Ryan wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 02:10:51PM -0400, Dave Grey exclaimed:
The digits seem to be either not recognized at all or recognized
incorrectly better than half the time. [...] I dial 7056 and it
sees 7055, I dial 7056 again and it sees 75, I dial
On Oct 29, 2005, at 8:09 AM, Colin Anderson wrote:
[...] my users are still leery about VoIP and they will nit-pick
about any little thing (You mean I have to press OK after I dial?
That's stupid and my all-time favorite I get confused when I have
three incoming calls at one, I forget
On Oct 29, 2005, at 8:39 PM, Oliver Welter wrote:
Hi Folks,
I digged all the forums but cant find an answer...
I want that an incoming user (via ISDN) is entertained by some MP3
music while asterisk is ringing the internal phone to server the
caller...
I tried MusicOnHold but it seems
Well, I am batting close to zero where responses to my questions are
concerned, but I suppose I will just keep swinging.
I just set up an account with callpacket.com, and noticed that on
incoming calls through this provider the values of CALLERID(name) and
CALLERID(num) are
These appear to be a common problems, but after spending half a day
reading the wiki and list archives I have not gained much useful
knowledge beyond the fact that these are a common problems. I am
hoping for some suggestions or pointers to further info.
I have an ivr in my incoming
On Oct 27, 2005, at 9:52 PM, Eric Bishop wrote:
We are running 1.0.9 STABLE on all of our machines. I am about try
and upgrade one machine to CVS HEAD as all this echo cancellation
improvements sound enticing. Can anyone recommend
a) A procedure to cleanly upgrade from STABLE to HEAD
b)
On Oct 25, 2005, at 6:33 PM, Jerry Richmond wrote:
This means I won't be giving anyone my personal
information.
I haven't laughed so hard in ages.
lyd
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
On Oct 26, 2005, at 10:31 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Matt wrote:
For instance, when someone blocks their number it comes into our
system with the block flag (across PRI). It is then passed on to
the
ATA as blocked. Is it legal for me to set the flag back to
unblock
the call? (I
On Oct 23, 2005, at 11:57 PM, Leif Madsen wrote:
On 10/20/05, Darrick Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leif Madsen wrote:
For those of you who are able to obtain the
full copy, please consider helping us out by creating mirrors and
torrents and posting them to the list by replying to this
On Oct 22, 2005, at 12:18 AM, Dave Grey wrote:
On Oct 21, 2005, at 5:50 PM, JP Carballo wrote:
Dave Grey wrote:
I hacked together an emacs general/minor mode for basic font-
locking (syntax shading) support. Feel free to grab it here:
http://homepage.mac.com/lydanynom/asterisk-mode.el.zip
Hi all.
I've just begun learning *, and as my dialplans and macros have
gotten more complex I started wishing for a way to more easily follow
the flow of various Goto, GotoIf, Dial, and etc. commands, especially
when trying to use priority n and labels rather than numbered
priorities.
On Oct 21, 2005, at 5:50 PM, JP Carballo wrote:
Dave Grey wrote:
I hacked together an emacs general/minor mode for basic font-
locking (syntax shading) support. Feel free to grab it here:
http://homepage.mac.com/lydanynom/asterisk-mode.el.zip
Good work Dave!
I suggest you post
I get these notices constantly:
Oct 22 01:26:35 NOTICE[383]: sched.c:296 ast_sched_del: Attempted to
delete nonexistent schedule entry 1!
They start with entry 1 after a fresh startup, and come back with
some higher number after each reload. They seem to happen every 60
seconds.
On Oct 18, 2005, at 4:44 PM, trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
While I appreciate the problems Matthew is going through, this is a
complex issue, and one that has plagued the net for a long time.
How do
you authenticate random people on the internet as 1. unique and 2. as
themselves.
Could
On Oct 18, 2005, at 11:02 PM, Matthew Simpson wrote:
I do like the Web of Trust idea. Maybe I'll do it google style and
give out some invites to people [say 5] and then those 5 people
will get a couple invites, and so on. Each invite would point back
to the person who gave it so if I
21 matches
Mail list logo
