Re: [asterisk-users] switching from 1.6.0-beta9 to 1.6.0.1 problems

Hi I've found a solution for what i think is exactly the same problem here: http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13491nbn=6 Regards Enrico Julien Claassen ha scritto: Hello everyone! I've just switched from Asterisk 1.6.0-beta9 to 1.6.0.1 and my mISDN is not working. Here's what

[asterisk-users] B410P and asterisk 1.6

Hi all, I'm trying to get a digium B410P to work with asterisk 1.6.0.1 (but i have the same problems with asterisk 1.6.0) Official digium documentation cover up to asterisk 1.4.x and suggest to use zaphfc... but as i understood zap is completely gone in 1.6 I tried with misdn (1.1.8, 1.1.7.2

Re: [asterisk-users] Zaptel problem with pots lines

Hi Noah, Hi Enrico - I'm trying to get up and running a TDM400 with a standard italian pots line but i'm having problems at getting asterisk to detect when the line get answered on outgoing calls. I'm using asterisk 1.6 beta 9 with zaptel 1.4.11. Zaptel channels use fxs_ks signalling

Re: [asterisk-users] Zaptel problem with pots lines

Hi Giorgio, Giorgio Incantalupo wrote: Hi Enrico, have you tried with busydetect=yes? It (sometimes) worked for me with Asterisk 1.2. Giorgio I'm already using busydetect=yes to detect hangup and busy conditions with good results, but it doesn't seem to be of any help on detecting

Re: [asterisk-users] Zaptel problem with pots lines

of yes Unfortunatly even with your exact same configuration nothing change. I'm using zaptel-1.4.6 and asterisk-1.4.20.1. I'll give a try with zaptel-1.4.6... I hope this could help you. Best regards, Marco Signorini. Regards, Enrico Maistro

[asterisk-users] Zaptel problem with pots lines

) kernel: 4294908325 Polarity reversed (0 - -1) kernel: 4294908326 Polarity reversed (0 - 1) kernel: BATTERY on 1/1 (-)! kernel: NO BATTERY on 1/2! Any suggestion? Am i trying to do something that simply can't be done? Thanks, Enrico Maistro