[Asterisk-Users] Affecting overhead with Runlevel?

2005-05-21 Thread Robert Goodyear
This is a _very_ green question, but I am just beginning to explore and learn Linux. Have to admit I avoided it for years due to other obligations but discovering Asterisk has forced my hand. So: knowing that the X11 window GUI is a resource hog, is it appropriate to use the GUI to install

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Affecting overhead with Runlevel?

2005-05-21 Thread Johnathan Corgan
Robert Goodyear wrote: So: knowing that the X11 window GUI is a resource hog, is it appropriate to use the GUI to install and configure various components, then set RUNLEVEL to 3 once all is nicely set up and running cleanly? Would this give the same effect as doing a minimal install or is

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Affecting overhead with Runlevel?

2005-05-21 Thread Robert Goodyear
On May 21, 2005, at 10:29 AM, Johnathan Corgan wrote: Robert Goodyear wrote: So: knowing that the X11 window GUI is a resource hog, is it appropriate to use the GUI to install and configure various components, then set RUNLEVEL to 3 once all is nicely set up and running cleanly? Would this

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Affecting overhead with Runlevel?

2005-05-21 Thread Johnathan Corgan
Robert Goodyear wrote: Noted. To clarify, will dropping back to runlevel 3 still ensure a smaller set of processes that would be as non-intrusive as if I had installed Linux with console/command line support only or would there still be stuff hanging around that's inextricably there because I

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Affecting overhead with Runlevel?

2005-05-21 Thread Robert Goodyear
On May 21, 2005, at 3:46 PM, Johnathan Corgan wrote: Robert Goodyear wrote: Noted. To clarify, will dropping back to runlevel 3 still ensure a smaller set of processes that would be as non-intrusive as if I had installed Linux with console/command line support only or would there still be