Daniel Salama wrote:
This is great information. I have the following questions based on a
hypothetical scenario and some assumptions:
Based on the price of these configurations, I wouldn't even mind putting
two servers each with 2 T1s just so that I could get all calls recorded
and distribute
---
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Salama [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 10:30 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Hardware Recommendation
This is great information. I have the following questions based
and it works rather well for us.
MATT---
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Salama [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 5:56 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Hardware Recommendation
Hi,
I've been reading on the wiki
Well, I don't think I'm ready to spend that much money :)
I understand your point regarding that load depends on usage.
SIP_Agents are simply agents answering calls. Average call length would
be about 8 minutes. During some of these calls (maybe 25%), agents will
conference the call (PSTN
12:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Hardware Recommendation
Sure.
I setup a small lab on a machine with 4 T1s and 36 agents logged in. The
system was configured to Monitor all outbound calls as well as monitor
all calls distributed by Queue app (monitor-format setting
Thanks Daniel,
We may end up replicating your tests in order to confirm some of your
results. I don't know if it will be anytime soon, because we don't have
the hardware yet. Regardless, I will share my results with the list.
Anyone out there have any ideas on why the NFS mount affected call
Does anyone have experience with using NAS
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network-attached_storage) or SAN
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storage_area_network) for this application?
Matthew Roth
http://voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Running%20Asterisk%20on%20Debian
Daniel Salama wrote:
Sure.
I
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Hardware Recommendation
Does anyone have experience with using NAS
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network-attached_storage) or SAN
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storage_area_network) for this application?
Matthew Roth
http://voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page
Hi Matt,
Does anyone have experience with using NAS
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network-attached_storage) or SAN
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storage_area_network) for this
application?
I've had our agent/queue recordings dumped both to local disk and SAN
(currently using local disk as
This is an interesting question. I haven't tested it but would love to
know if it works or not. Anyone?
- Daniel
On Apr 29, 2005, at 3:38 AM, Michael Welter wrote:
I haven't seen this before--can an agent log into a queue on a remote
(i.e. over IAX) Asterisk server?
Hi,
I've been reading on the wiki as well as on this list, different
suggestions of what to look for when designing an asterisk server with
a lot of traffic. By a lot of traffic, I mean a box with a a TE4XXP,
that will be hit to full capacity (96 simultaneous calls). This box
will also deliver
I just read a great paper that said turn off anything that won't be
used. Serial, USB , Printer ports, ETC. No Xwindows!
Daniel Salama wrote:
Hi,
I've been reading on the wiki as well as on this list, different
suggestions of what to look for when designing an asterisk server with
a lot of
---
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Salama [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 5:56 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Hardware Recommendation
Hi,
I've been reading on the wiki as well as on this list, different
Could you point me in the direction where you read that? Maybe there is
more there to read.
Thanks,
Daniel
On Apr 28, 2005, at 6:31 PM, Michael D Schelin wrote:
I just read a great paper that said turn off anything that won't be
used. Serial, USB , Printer ports, ETC. No Xwindows!
Daniel
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Hardware Recommendation
Hi,
I've been reading on the wiki as well as on this list, different
suggestions of what to look for when designing an asterisk server with
a lot of traffic. By a lot of traffic, I mean
Daniel Salama wrote:
Thank you again. I will definitely do that. By cheaper asterisk
servers, do you mean single-CPU machines that can handle Quad T1s and
still do the call monitoring?
BTW, I tried the monitoring without the 'm' option and mounted the
audio directory via NFS. Big NO NO for
---
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Salama [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 5:56 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Hardware Recommendation
Hi,
I've been reading on the wiki as well as on this list, different
.
Thanks,
MATT---
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Salama [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 6:59 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Hardware Recommendation
Thank you again. I will definitely do
: Daniel Salama [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 6:59 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Hardware Recommendation
Thank you again. I will definitely do that. By cheaper asterisk
servers, do you mean single-CPU
19 matches
Mail list logo
