A Linksys WRT54G runs for about $60. I think it supports QoS out of the
box, but flash it with 3rd party firmware (i.e. Sveasoft) to get a bunch
of extra features.
Note: The latest version, version 5, of the WRT54G only has half the
memory of the previous versions and there is no 3rd party
Any recommendations on an ADSL router with QOS for VOIP built in?
Anything sub $500 would be great.
Thank you
Keith Schmidt
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
Keith, Not sure exactly what you are looking for with the built in request. I have included a link that is a great box I use in the field alot for customers who don't want to pay cisco prices. It has the ability to do QOS and routing.
sure
it can be bought all over the world
Anders
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Schmidt
Sent: den 10 november 2005 21:46
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] DSL router with QOS
Any
Draytek 2600V - ADSL Router, Firewall, VPN, QOS, VOIP, 4 Port Switch -
Expect to pay around $220
Draytek 2600VG - Same as the 2600V but with 802.11B WIFI - Expect to pay
around $229
Cory J Andrews
Partner / Purchasing
+++
VOIPSupply.com - Everything you need for VOIP
454 Sonwil
What's the point?
You can prioritise as much as you like at your own end, but as soon as it leaves
your premises and enters the 'net, all bets are off!
Even the contention ratio of the DSL circuit (as provided by your ISP) can kill
you.
QOS is really only useful in a point-to-point
I am concerned about Voice quality on a dsl line, that is my first
priority. I would like an ADSL modem built in but that is not a
requirement. A built in wireless access point would be nice too.
I purchased a Cisco 857W and Cisco's pre-sales support told me that it
would do QOS but come to
Speaking from my own experience, I would say that the point is that
when a user has, for instance, a DSL line running at 3.0mbps down and
256kbps up, it is very easy to saturate the outgoing bandwidth,
resulting in queues of up to 1-2 seconds for outgoing packets at the
DSL modem.
The ADSL line
Rod Bacon wrote:
What's the point?
You can prioritise as much as you like at your own end, but as soon as
it leaves your premises and enters the 'net, all bets are off!
While I do this for a living (networks and QoS) and I shouldn't argue
with the above, I will. The engineer in me just has
The Cisco 870 Series ($500.00 to $600.00 range, with the secK9 option,
could be less without, I'm not sure) will do just that, and is
available with a built in ADSL modem (and many more pluses):
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps380/products_data_sheet0900aecd8028a976.html
On
Rod
I want my voice traffic to go out first; I have 2 server (a dns server
and a web server that host 10 small sites) and 8 computers on my
business class dsl connection (3 megs down 768 up, 7 static IPs).
Sometimes people send out large emails and I think it floods my DSL
connection, my
Speaking from my own experience, I would say that the point is that when a
user
has, for instance, a DSL line
running at 3.0mbps down and 256kbps up, it is very easy to saturate the
outgoing
bandwidth, resulting in queues
of up to 1-2 seconds for outgoing packets at the DSL modem.
Dear all,
Well for implementing QOS, i 'm using Arbitrator open source Linux
version, then i'm using arbiqos who's specialy design for VoIP stream,
it's very good and priority the voIP channel. but it's very hard to
compiled because you must compiled kernel 2.4.19 from source.
if you like i
13 matches
Mail list logo
