On Jun 6, 2005, at 4:31 PM, Chris Mason (Lists) wrote:
Digium did acquiesce and allow me to relicense the codec today,
essentially
they asked me how any times I would like to be able to re-license,
I hope you answered, As many times as is necessary to ensure I'm
continually able to
We want to build the new Asterisk PBX with the Polycom 500 IP phone.
So G.729 is the only alternative for small codec for WAN calls, isn't
it?
Brian McSpadden wrote:
On 6/5/05, Chris Mason (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you are at least morally correct, I think I might
Cool, so you have satisfied yourself that you are licensed to use the
G.729 codec and not get your ass sued by the IP holders. Now you can
simply use the no-license-required codecs from here...
http://kvin.lv/pub/Linux/Asterisk/
I've tried using these codecs in the past, but usually ended up
fine with a few UK providers.
gdh
-Original Message-
From: Nir Simionovich[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06/06/05 09:26:32
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion'asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Digium G729 licensing - is it worth
)
704-7249 Fax: (815)301-9759
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kib
EkiSent: Monday, June 06, 2005 3:22 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
DiscussionSubject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Digium G729 licensing
PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Digium G729 licensing - is it
worth the trouble?
We want to build the new Asterisk PBX with the Polycom 500 IP phone.
So G.729 is the only alternative for small codec for WAN calls, isn't
: Monday, June 06, 2005 7:35 AMTo: Asterisk Users
Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: Re:
[Asterisk-Users] Digium G729 licensing - is it worth the
trouble?
could you please explain the transcoding to me? How do i have to
configure this?Chris Mason (Lists) wrote:
Yes
I am using the IPP Based G729 and have interopped with eyebeam, a
polycom ip 500 a sipura 3000.
Nir Simionovich wrote:
Cool, so you have satisfied yourself that you are licensed to use the
G.729 codec and not get your ass sued by the IP holders. Now you can
simply use the
If you have licenses or experimenting with g729 you might want to look
at http://www.readytechnology.co.uk/open/g729/
it requires Intel C/C++ compiler and IPP libraries.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Digium G729 licensing - is it worth the
trouble?
From
Digium did acquiesce and allow me to relicense the codec today, essentially
they asked me how any times I would like to be able to re-license, so I
believe that they are willing to work with the players once they can confirm
their authenticity. They have a strange licensing scheme and I cannot
I have been impressed with the quality and meagre bandwidth of the G729
codec from Digium. I am in a testing phase of our roll out, we are using 5
Asterisk PBXs in various countries to provide connectivity for our
employees, owners and family. As we are testing, and our setup is somewhat
complex
I realize they have piracy problems, but that's their problem. I paid for
the codecs, and I think I should be able to use them. People who are
avoiding the licenses don't call you up to tell you. I don't mind having to
call and let them know why I need to re-register, but I did not expect to be
On Sunday 05 June 2005 16:31, Chris Mason (Lists) wrote:
I have purchased 50 licenses at $10 each from Digium,
Cool, so you have satisfied yourself that you are licensed to use the G.729
codec and not get your ass sued by the IP holders. Now you can simply use the
no-license-required codecs
I think you are at least morally correct, I think I might do that.
However, I guess part fo the question is, does it make much difference, am I
that badly off without G729?
The other point it, doesn't Digium realize they are pissing customers off
with their attitude? I took a lot of my time to
Digium has to make sure they dont give out licenses when they should
not. (according to their licensing of the codec).
In your case, i suspect they lost track of the ticket, i suggest you
just call them with your ticket number and they will resolve this quickly.
Zoa.
Chris Mason (Lists) wrote:
Digium has to make sure they dont give out licenses when they
should not. (according to their licensing of the codec).
In your case, i suspect they lost track of the ticket, i
suggest you just call them with your ticket number and they
will resolve this quickly.
They were pretty emphatic
I think you are at least morally correct, I think I might do that.
However, I guess part fo the question is, does it make much difference, am I
that badly off without G729?
The other point it, doesn't Digium realize they are pissing customers off
with their attitude? I took a lot of my time
Gavin Hamill wrote:
On Sunday 05 June 2005 16:31, Chris Mason (Lists) wrote:
I have purchased 50 licenses at $10 each from Digium,
Cool, so you have satisfied yourself that you are licensed to use the G.729
codec and not get your ass sued by the IP holders. Now you can simply use
On 6/5/05, Chris Mason (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you are at least morally correct, I think I might do that.
However, I guess part fo the question is, does it make much difference, am I
that badly off without G729?
The other point it, doesn't Digium realize they are pissing
19 matches
Mail list logo
