I currently have an Asterisk running on an Alix 6B2 from PC Engines, but I am
having trouble using ztdummy as a timing device. The USB driver is OHCI, and
I believe ztdummy requires UHCI.
So, I am wondering if there is a way to use a Kernel tick and ztdummy on
FreeBSD, like it is possible on
Hello
Since the Ports collection showed that there were more recent
versions of Asterisk and Zaptel, I tried to compile/install Zaptel,
but it fails, even after stopping Zaptel cleanly, and even after
stopping Asterisk itself, so I decided to just reboot.
Now, when I type ztcfg -vv, I
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 00:44:28 +0200, Vincent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I updated the Ports collection to compile the latest Asterisk, but
after running make config, make just returns without doing
anything:
For those having the same problem: make clean ; make config ; make ;
make deinstall ;
Hello
I updated the Ports collection to compile the latest Asterisk, but
after running make config, make just returns without doing
anything:
=
# pkg_version -v | grep asterisk
asterisk-1.4.20.1_1needs updating (port has
1.4.21.2_3)
^C
# cd
Hello
I'm running Asterisk 1.4.20.1 on a FreeBSD that I compiled from the
Ports collection.
It's the second time I'm having an issue with a FXO card and/or the
Zaptel driver. I couldn't figure out what else to do, so I just
rebooted the server, but I'd like to know what happened, and
If Asterisk is running that will happen. Make sure to shutdown asterisk
cleanly before doing that.
Anthony
Vincent wrote:
Hello
I'm running Asterisk 1.4.20.1 on a FreeBSD that I compiled from the
Ports collection.
It's the second time I'm having an issue with a FXO card and/or the
On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 12:47:58 -0600, Anthony Francis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If Asterisk is running that will happen. Make sure to shutdown asterisk
cleanly before doing that.
Sorry, forgot to say that I couldn't restart or stop/start Asterisk:
[Sep 6 19:06:17] WARNING[23110]: chan_zap.c:4157
Hello
I'm running Asterisk 1.4.20.1 on a FreeBSD 6.3 host, and unless I'm
mistaken, it seems like /usr/local/etc/rc.d/asterisk script doesn't
make use of /usr/local/sbin/safe_asterisk to restart Asterisk in case
it crashes.
Is this correct, and if yes, why not use it?
Thank you.
Vincent wrote:
Hello
I'm running Asterisk 1.4.20.1 on a FreeBSD 6.3 host, and unless I'm
mistaken, it seems like /usr/local/etc/rc.d/asterisk script doesn't
make use of /usr/local/sbin/safe_asterisk to restart Asterisk in case
it crashes.
Is this correct, and if yes, why not use it?
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:36:27 +0200, Vincent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will do, although it could be a problem in the Zaptel code, which is
not written by the mfg. Thanks.
I also notice that I can't restart the driver:
# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/zaptel restart
zaptelkldunload: can't unload file:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:47:04 -0500, Tilghman Lesher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please call the reseller from which you bought the card or the manufacturer
for support.
Will do, although it could be a problem in the Zaptel code, which is
not written by the mfg. Thanks.
Hello
This PC had been running a Ports-compiled Asterisk 1.4.16.x
succesfully for almost three months, but this morning, although
Asterisk itself seemed fined, the Zaptel interface stopped taking
calls.
Stopping/restarting Zaptel using /usr/local/etc/rc.d/zaptel stop-start
didn't let
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 10:20:38 +0100, Vincent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option -Wno-pointer-sign
*** Error code 1
I wonder if maybe the people who ported Asterisk to FreeBSD aren't
using a more recent version of GCC than what's available in the 6.2
ports:
Hello
I'm trying to build the Zaptel ports on FreeBSD, but it fails:
==
# cd /usr/ports/misc/zaptel/
# make install
=== Building for zaptel-1.4.6_3
make -C zaptel all
Warning: Object directory not changed from original
/usr/ports/misc/zaptel/work/zaptel-bsd-1.4.6/zaptel
cc -O2
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 08:57:28PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone:
I'm trying to compile Asterisk on FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE and I'm getting the
following error:
cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Iinclude
Hi everyone:
I'm trying to compile Asterisk on FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE and I'm getting the
following error:
cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Iinclude -I../include
-D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -DMAKE_VALGRIND_HAPPY
Greetings-
Was running the Digium FreeBSD g.729 codec until recently when the latest
Asterisk bits were obtained via svn:
svn checkout http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk asterisk
This produced:
Checked out revision 30652
This on FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE
Attempting to start asterisk it
Kim Culhan wrote:
Was running the Digium FreeBSD g.729 codec until recently when the latest
Asterisk bits were obtained via svn:
svn checkout http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk asterisk
MAYBE it is the same problem:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2006-April/147577.html
Hi, I have also failed the same point. Mine is 5.4-Stable Jul 16, did make
world from 5.3 which works * 1.0.6(?) ports and I did cvsup ports-supfile
again several minutes ago. NG.
--
Zen
Darren Wiebe wrote
Did you do a make clean? I just, as in 1 hour ago, successfully
installed 1.0.9
Ask this question on asterisk-bsd
Chris
- Original Message -
From: Jack Towards [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 4:38 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD 5.4 (Asterisk 1.0.9) - Playback ,MP3Player
and Musiconhold not working
I
Darren Wiebe wrote
Did you do a make clean? I just, as in 1 hour ago, successfully
installed 1.0.9 using the port on FreeBSD.
Yeah, even deleted all the files in the asterisk ports , and refreshed it
ports collection. Always fails to compile at this point.
Am I missing a package dependency
I installed Asterisk 1.0.9 in a Freebsd 5.4 ( with no zaptel card); I
have 2 zoom x5v and works great ( in extensions 123 and 321 ) but I
was trying to test cmd Playback, MusicOnHold, MP3Player but when I
call to extension 100 I don't hear the sound ( mp3 or gsm that I put)
, I only hear noise
If
Hiya,
I was just updating Asterisk to 1.0.9 on FreeBSD 5.4, using the new ports
updates. The port won't compile I just get this.
chan_zap.c: In function `pri_dchannel':
chan_zap.c:8391: error: structure has no member named `cause'
chan_zap.c:8886: error: structure has no member named
Did you do a make clean? I just, as in 1 hour ago, successfully
installed 1.0.9 using the port on FreeBSD.
Darren Wiebe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark Ackroyd wrote:
Hiya,
I was just updating Asterisk to 1.0.9 on FreeBSD 5.4, using the new ports
updates. The port won't compile I just get this.
All,
I am from Brazil, and I am no finding the Digium boards to sell here.
I am currently using FreeBSD 5.3 to run asterisk. Digium cards could be
used with this OS ?
How is possible to use a generic modem (like INTEL MD3200) with FreeBSD
5.3? It has the total supported drivers for it ? Does
Hello,
I just purchased 10 G729 licenses for my asterisk box from Digium I was able
to register the key. But when i start asterisk it fails with the error
message:
[codec_g729a.so]Nov 18 09:27:01 WARNING[135073792]: loader.c:248
ast_load_resource: Shared object libc.so.6 not found
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 03:27:40AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just purchased 10 G729 licenses for my asterisk box from Digium I was able
to register the key. But when i start asterisk it fails with the error
message:
[codec_g729a.so]Nov 18 09:27:01 WARNING[135073792]:
Hi all,
I think there is no asterisk-addons version
for freebsd. Am I right? I tried to compile the standard version but I couldn't
do iton FreeBSD, may be the idea is as crazy as try to install asterisk
for linux on freebsd!
___
Asterisk-Users
On 18/11/2004 17:25 kido noagbodji said the following:
I just purchased 10 G729 licenses for my asterisk box from Digium I was able
to register the key. But when i start asterisk it fails with the error
message:
[codec_g729a.so]Nov 18 09:27:01 WARNING[135073792]: loader.c:248
Hi,
Trying to configure a voicemail system on
FreeBSD 4.10 + asterisk 0.9.0, I found the following
problems:
1. When I try to launch VoicemailMain from
IAX Softphone (IAXComm), asterisk generates a Segmentation fault (core dumped)
and obviosly all the system went down. It doesn't happen
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:35:32 -, Victor Alvarez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Trying to configure a voicemail system on FreeBSD 4.10 + asterisk 0.9.0, I
found the following problems:
Download the latest asterisk versions from cvs (try a make update in
the asterisk src directory)
Hello List,
I seem to have a reoccuring problem trying to find the right version
of the zaptel drivers to run with asterisk under FreeBSD.
I had been running asterisk-0.9 with zaptel 0.7 with no problems (both
built from FreeBSD ports). Yesterday I cvsup'd my ports tree and build
asterisk
On 07/11/2004 21:06 Richard Airlie said the following:
I had been running asterisk-0.9 with zaptel 0.7 with no problems (both
built from FreeBSD ports). Yesterday I cvsup'd my ports tree and build
asterisk 1.0.1_1 and zaptel 0.8_1, which seemed to work except that
any attempt to play music on hold
Can I use the clone Card.
Generic
X100P
Intel IA92 WinModem compatible with X100P. This is
the so-called clone X100P. No technical support is available for this product.
To a FreeBSD Station white the
FreeBSD Zaptel drivers.
Peter
Compiled Asterisk from FreeBSD port (0.9.0_2)
When I start asterisk it uses 100% cpu. Searches on Google
say to comment the noload = chan_oss.so in modules.conf
But this is already commented. Make.conf contains some
optimizations.
modules.conf:
; Asterisk configuration file
;
; Module Loader
On 21/09/2004 20:20 Jan Baggen said the following:
Compiled Asterisk from FreeBSD port (0.9.0_2)
When I start asterisk it uses 100% cpu. Searches on Google
say to comment the noload = chan_oss.so in modules.conf
But this is already commented. Make.conf contains some
optimizations.
add 'noload =
hey asterisk folk,
i'm new to asterisk, but not to freebsd as i've been using it and
developing on it for quite a few years. we're planning on deploying
asterisk as part of a voip provider's service platform and naturally i'd
rather be using freebsd instead of a linux based distro. as such, i am
The status of the FreeBSD port of Asterisk
Changes this week:
Rich Nesse fixed compilation of app_intercom
and chan_oss. A solution to bug 1411,
recursive lock inititalization, was submitted
that seems to be stable on FreeBSD 5.2.1 in
terms of up-time. Libpri builds on FreeBSD
as well now.
I've been lurking on the list for quite a while now, and I hadn't seen
much from people using FreeBSD, so I figured I'd post something.
Yes, the driver in the ports tree for the digium card works!
I'd heard reports that it crashes the box/etc, but I have yet to encounter
that.
I've had all the
In our last exciting episode, Tom (UnitedLayer) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
Yes, the driver in the ports tree for the digium card works!
I'd heard reports that it crashes the box/etc, but I have yet to encounter
that.
What is the name of the port? I don't see it and I refresh my ports tree
on my
/usr/ports/misc/zaptel
--
Arnold Cavazos, Jr. abcjr at abcjr . net
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 10:06:00AM -0500, Jason T. Nelson wrote:
In our last exciting episode, Tom (UnitedLayer) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
Yes, the driver in the ports tree for the digium card works!
I'd heard
port misc/zaptel
In our last exciting episode, Tom (UnitedLayer) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
Yes, the driver in the ports tree for the digium card works!
I'd heard reports that it crashes the box/etc, but I have yet to encounter
that.
What is the name of the port? I don't see it and I
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Stenton
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 10:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD + Zaptel + Asterisk
port misc/zaptel
In our last exciting episode, Tom
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 04:56:46PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
the freebsd port tree version is dead because of the openh323
issues. before i start hacking, i am hoping someone else has
a freebsd version that will build on -current. and i do not
care about h232.
Just comment out the line with
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 04:56:46PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
the freebsd port tree version is dead because of the openh323
issues. before i start hacking, i am hoping someone else has
a freebsd version that will build on -current. and i do not
care about h232.
dare i hope?
randy
make
make install -DNO_IGNORE
h, scary considering i don't need h323. or am i misunderstanding
something?
I'm also working on a freebsd port that uses the cvs version of
asterisk, let me know if you're interested in taking a look.
o! but i am about to go back on the road. so i
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 08:38:32AM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
make install -DNO_IGNORE
h, scary considering i don't need h323. or am i misunderstanding
something?
NO_IGNORE is going to bypass all of the forbidden lines for all of
the dependencies
--
David W. Chapman Jr.
[EMAIL
the freebsd port tree version is dead because of the openh323
issues. before i start hacking, i am hoping someone else has
a freebsd version that will build on -current. and i do not
care about h232.
dare i hope?
randy
___
Asterisk-Users mailing
In our FreeBSD port of Asterisk, we have a lot of local patches and I
was wondering if it were possible to get some of them merged into the
Asterisk source base.
Thanks
--
David W. Chapman Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Raintree Network Services, Inc. www.inethouston.net
David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
In our FreeBSD port of Asterisk, we have a lot of local patches and I
was wondering if it were possible to get some of them merged into the
Asterisk source base.
Thanks
You need to ask on asterisk-dev, not asterisk-users.
My guess would be break them down to
Andrew Thompson wrote:
David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
In our FreeBSD port of Asterisk, we have a lot of local patches and I
was wondering if it were possible to get some of them merged into the
Asterisk source base.
Thanks
You need to ask on asterisk-dev, not asterisk-users.
My guess would be
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Joe Phillips wrote:
On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 20:25, Steven M. Sokol wrote:
Not currently. There is a bounty for the development of working Wildcard
drivers for Free/Net/Open BSD. Care to write them?
On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 20:33, James Moran wrote:
Dam wish I was
On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 20:25, Steven M. Sokol wrote:
Not currently. There is a bounty for the development of working Wildcard
drivers for Free/Net/Open BSD. Care to write them?
On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 20:33, James Moran wrote:
Dam wish I was that good to do that.
You can pitch into the
Do any of the Wildcards work with FreeBSD??
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD
Do any of the Wildcards work with FreeBSD??
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Moran
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 6:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD
Do any of the Wildcards work with FreeBSD??
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Moran
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 6:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD
Do any of the Wildcards work with FreeBSD??
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
*cough* not a thing.
- Joshua Colp.
- Original Message -
From: James Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 9:46 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD
Does any of the hardware work with FreeBSD??
On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 20:25, Steven M. Sokol
: James Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 9:46 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD
Does any of the hardware work with FreeBSD??
On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 20:25, Steven M. Sokol wrote:
Not currently. There is a bounty for the development of working
Wildcard
9:46 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD
Does any of the hardware work with FreeBSD??
On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 20:25, Steven M. Sokol wrote:
Not currently. There is a bounty for the development of working
Wildcard
drivers for Free/Net/Open BSD. Care to write them?
Steve
On 2004 Mar 29, at 20:54, Chris Albertson wrote:
One other on-line resource: http://zapatatelephony.org/
The _original_ driver was for BSD. The folks at Digium
apparently ported it to Linux and likely improved it over
time. But the old BSD driver is still there.
Apparently.
Currently the asterisk port is blocked due to vulnerabilities in pwlib.
Chris
- Original Message -
From: Joe Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 9:30 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD Segmentation Fault on start up
To all;
I've got two
On Thursday 25 March 2004 15:30, Joe Lewis wrote:
I've got two installations of asterisk. The last one (installed a
few days ago) is from the FreeBSD ports, and many thanks, because
it compiled BEAUTIFULLY! However, I can't run it. Everytime I
start asterisk, I get a segmentation fault.
After the last FreeBSD-hostile response from someone on the list, I was
wondering about something someone else said a few weeks ago: that something
of the magnitude of a *real* Asterisk under FreeBSD project would probably
require its own mailing list (and perhaps its own project website). Has
: "Joe Lewis" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 9:30 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] FreeBSD Segmentation Fault on start up
To all;
I've got two installations of asterisk. The last one (installed a few
days ago) is from the FreeBSD ports, and m
Joe Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Article converted from unnecessary HTML to nice plain text.)
But I thought asterisk was just a console application, with no need for
XWindows at all. Or is it on hold due to the GUI controlling mechanisms?
You don't have to run Asterisk from the console.
To all;
I've got two installations of asterisk. The last one (installed a few
days ago) is from the FreeBSD ports, and many thanks, because it
compiled BEAUTIFULLY! However, I can't run it. Everytime I start
asterisk, I get a segmentation fault. asterisk -c reveals :
[...snip...]
http://www.psknet.com
866.477.5638
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Christopher Arnold
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 7:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] freeBSD zaptel driver
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004
On Sunday 29 February 2004 20:13, Michael Rowley wrote:
Does anyone have any information on the zaptel driver under
freeBSD? I know that there has been a 1200$ bounty posted, but
wasn't sure if anyone with any talent has taken up the project. (I
don't really have any talent... :| )
If this
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Michael Rowley wrote:
Does anyone have any information on the zaptel driver under freeBSD? I
know that there has been a 1200$ bounty posted, but wasn't sure if
anyone with any talent has taken up the project. (I don't really have
any talent... :| )
We have people
Hello,
Does anyone have any information on the zaptel driver under freeBSD? I
know that there has been a 1200$ bounty posted, but wasn't sure if
anyone with any talent has taken up the project. (I don't really have
any talent... :| )
Michael
___
Andrew Joakimsen wrote:
I am trying to get Asterisk to compile on FreeBSD 4.8. Per bug 389, BSD
support should be in CVS. I have also tried applying the patch in bug
374, but always get these messages:
click# make
Makefile, line 21: Missing dependency operator
Makefile, line 23: Need an operator
Not sure if it matters or not, but have you tried gmake?
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 19:29, Andrew Joakimsen wrote:
I am trying to get Asterisk to compile on FreeBSD 4.8. Per bug 389, BSD
support should be in CVS. I have also tried applying the patch in bug
374, but always get these messages:
I haven't looked @ Frrebsd support, but possibly using gmake will fix
the problem pfor you?
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 03:29:58AM -0500, Andrew Joakimsen wrote:
I am trying to get Asterisk to compile on FreeBSD 4.8. Per bug 389, BSD
support should be in CVS. I have also tried applying the patch in
It looks like my conversion of the STUN server to a GNU Autotools
build system will go into Vovida.org's CVS system soon. My next
task will be to do the same for Asterisk. Third task is to get
Asterisk to use STUN.
Back to BSD: I think GNU Autotools is the right way to fix this.
But until
I was wondering if anyone knows if
Asterisk works in FreeBSD? I heard the problem was
that the digium cards werent supported in FreeBSD.
Thanks,
Alex
Alex Ayala wrote:
I was wondering if anyone knows if Asterisk works in FreeBSD? I heard
the problem was that the digium cards werent supported in FreeBSD.
Thanks,
Alex
AFAIK, Asterisk can be made to compile and run but as you mentioned I
think the problem is drivers..
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 06:13:02PM -0500, denon wrote:
With regards to Asterisk on FBSD, I for one would love to see it happen. I
prefer FreeBSD over Linux in almost every case.
However, personally I have a few concerns:
Namely, the primary developer is a Linux nut .. (sorry Mark, I mean
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 11:02:59AM +0100, Alastair Maw wrote:
As importantly, we'll get cross-unix portability for less effort. There
won't be a *BSD port - the autoconf stuff will sort it all out for you.
Of course, we'll have to do some work to make sure it all functions
properly, but it
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Jim Mercer wrote:
i've not done an autoconf before, and i suspect it will require not a small
amount of tweaking.
i suspect the BSD patches will head in the direction of a number of those
tweaks.
Some of the patches that get applied in the normal /usr/ports tree under
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 07:53 am, Jim Mercer wrote:
any excentricities the SCO-linux people add to the code can usually
be ifdef'd back to normality. 8^)
Try the one in acl.c, referencing /proc/net/route. To do the
analogous on FreeBSD, you have to parse kernel internal structures.
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 05:02 am, Alastair Maw wrote:
denon wrote:
With regards to Asterisk on FBSD, I for one would love to see it
happen. I prefer FreeBSD over Linux in almost every case.
However, personally I have a few concerns:
Namely, the primary developer is a Linux nut
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Alastair Maw wrote:
I keep meaning to sort out autoconf/automake stuff for Asterisk. I
notice that Asterisk is GPLed, so there won't be any licensing issues.
I'm quite surprised no one else has got round to it before.
Anyway, I have no time at the moment for this, but
Since no one yet has objected to this proposal, could you all move on
from discussing if it should happen, and toward doing something. In the
long run it shouldn't be that big of a deal to make the few changes
necessary. Also if someone jumps in and gets the autoconf started, I'm
sure Mark will be
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Jim Mercer wrote:
Can we bribe you? :)
sure, pay my rent for 3 months and give me a 50 plasma TV to play in the
background.
Is that all? That sounds rather cheap, compared to the things direction
that I'd have to go if I wanted to stick to the cisci CM route, with
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, denon wrote:
I'd hate to see development efforts get split up, and more time spent on
porting/etc efforts, detracting from primary development. If it's now
slowing down new development, it's always a step behind while someone
patches up the current builds.
Once the code
I agree 100%. Sometimes code works on one system
because of a quirk. Building and testing on
multiple systems and debugging the autoconf scripts
has a way of making the code mature and robust. I
keep and old DEC Alpha (a 64 bit machine) and SPARC
(big endian byte order) and run Solaris and
another. I mean, by the time you strip down the linux install to make it
rock-stable, it's basically a kernel, compiler, and a handful of
dependances. Does it really matter what OS it runs on at this point, as
long as it's a robust kernel?
At least in my case, I /can/ strip down a FreeBSD
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, John Brown wrote:
so has anyone gotten * ported to freeBSD yet ??
Everything I've seen points to it being more an issue of Telco HW support,
rather than SW support from asterisk.
The Digium HW has yet to be supported in FreeBSD/NetBSD, and Asterisk
doesn't support the
://www.psknet.com
540.994.4254 ~ 866.477.5638
Pulaski Chamber 2002 Small Business Of The Year
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Tom (UnitedLayer)
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 4:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users
] On Behalf Of
Tom (UnitedLayer)
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 4:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd and asterisk ?? anyone yet
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, John Brown wrote:
so has anyone gotten * ported to freeBSD yet ??
Everything I've seen points to it being more an issue
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Troy Settle wrote:
I know a few people (myself included) are willing to help provide
incentive funds to get this going.
Maybe we should coordinate to make this an organized effort?
The big quesiton for Digium: What will it take to get * up to speed and
the drivers ported
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Tom (UnitedLayer) wrote:
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, John Brown wrote:
so has anyone gotten * ported to freeBSD yet ??
Everything I've seen points to it being more an issue of Telco HW support,
rather than SW support from asterisk.
I'd like to see the software side compile
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:49:06PM -0700, David Raistrick wrote:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Tom (UnitedLayer) wrote:
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, John Brown wrote:
so has anyone gotten * ported to freeBSD yet ??
Everything I've seen points to it being more an issue of Telco HW support,
rather than SW
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Jim Mercer wrote:
I'd like to see the software side compile under FreeBSD. According to the
plan that rests in the back of my head waiting on that day, I have no need
of the hardware side. I'd use VIC cards in my existing ciscos to
interface to the land lines, for the
At 12:49 -0700 8/9/03, David Raistrick wrote:
I'd like to see the software side compile under FreeBSD. According to the
plan that rests in the back of my head waiting on that day, I have no need
of the hardware side. I'd use VIC cards in my existing ciscos to
interface to the land lines, for the
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:50:07PM +0100, Fearghas McKay wrote:
At 12:49 -0700 8/9/03, David Raistrick wrote:
I'd like to see the software side compile under FreeBSD. According to the
plan that rests in the back of my head waiting on that day, I have no need
of the hardware side. I'd use VIC
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 03:49:45PM -0700, Tom (UnitedLayer) wrote:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Jim Mercer wrote:
however, my real job keeps getting in the way. 8^(
if i manage to get it going, then it becomes part of my real job, and things
will move more quickly.
Can we bribe you? :)
sure,
project are the current
drivers for the Digium products? I think that I read on that site that the
original drivers were for FreeBSD.
Sean
- Original Message -
From: Jim Mercer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 9:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] freebsd
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Jim Mercer wrote:
Can we bribe you? :)
sure, pay my rent for 3 months and give me a 50 plasma TV to play in the
background.
Hrm, thats a bit steep for me.
How about 1.5 months, and a goat with fleas?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
