Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: TDMoE over bonded NIC's

2004-11-23 Thread Ronan Mullally
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Kevin Brennan wrote: It happens servers come with twin GB NIC's, bonding is for redundancy not capacity. /Kev/ If all you're after is redunancy then have a look at failover rather than bonding - you'll have nothing to worry about with regard to frames potentially arriving

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: TDMoE over bonded NIC's

2004-11-22 Thread Jason Williams
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 19:50:36 -, Kevin Brennan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am planning to configure * box A with PSTN interface to route faxes to * box B (running spandsp) over TDMoE. I am using 2xGb bonded NIC's for connection between servers. Was wondering - does anybody have experience

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: TDMoE over bonded NIC's

2004-11-22 Thread Peter Svensson
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Jason Williams wrote: I recommend you use Iax trunking rather than TDMoE this would scale better. Using iax trunking will also loose the advantage of being tdm all the way, i.e. low latancies. If the rest of the setup is tdm there is a lot of value in not going to voip

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: TDMoE over bonded NIC's

2004-11-22 Thread Kevin Brennan
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Jason Williams wrote: I recommend you use Iax trunking rather than TDMoE this would scale better. Using iax trunking will also loose the advantage of being tdm all the way, i.e. low latancies. If the rest of the setup is tdm there is a lot of value in not going to

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: TDMoE over bonded NIC's

2004-11-22 Thread Peter Svensson
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Kevin Brennan wrote: Using iax trunking will also loose the advantage of being tdm all the way, i.e. low latancies. If the rest of the setup is tdm there is a lot of value in not going to voip for one hop. This is what I was thinking, FAX would be more reliable (low

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: TDMoE over bonded NIC's

2004-11-22 Thread Nick Bachmann
Kevin Brennan wrote: Kevin Brennan wrote: I am planning to configure * box A with PSTN interface to route faxes to box B (running spandsp) over TDMoE. I am using 2xGb bonded NIC's for connection between servers. 2GB?!? Remember, each voice channel you trunk across TDMoE is

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: TDMoE over bonded NIC's

2004-11-22 Thread Peter Svensson
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Nick Bachmann wrote: You know you shouldn't (can't?) use the same interface for regular IP networking and TDMoE, right? The TDMoE should have an address-less NIC to itself and _really_ shouldn't run through a hub (an xover would be ideal). Bonding seems possible,

[Asterisk-Users] Fw: TDMoE over bonded NIC's

2004-11-21 Thread Kevin Brennan
I am planning to configure * box A with PSTN interface to route faxes to * box B (running spandsp) over TDMoE. I am using 2xGb bonded NIC's for connection between servers. Was wondering - does anybody have experience with TDMoE over bonded interface - ie. does it work ok?. - does anybody have

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: TDMoE over bonded NIC's

2004-11-21 Thread Nick Bachmann
Kevin Brennan wrote: I am planning to configure * box A with PSTN interface to route faxes to * box B (running spandsp) over TDMoE. I am using 2xGb bonded NIC's for connection between servers. 2GB?!? Remember, each voice channel you trunk across TDMoE is 64Kbps. While overprovisioning is laudable,