Re: [Asterisk-Users] Q.931 to SIGTRAN interface

2005-04-04 Thread Dinesh Nair
On 04/02/05 10:11 Mike Mueller said the following: I don't think an Asterisk box can generate enough calls to cause sockets related performance penalties. Five packets per phone call. What's the max call rate an Asterisk box can support? i think that would require an OS dependent answer. but

[Asterisk-Users] Q.931 to SIGTRAN interface

2005-04-01 Thread Mike Mueller
Hi, In response to: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2005-March/098214.html quote How about simply doing a Q.931 to SIGTRAN conversion module would that not be simpler to implement? /quote Implementing this idea would help Asterisk become integrated with SS7 gateways in a

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Q.931 to SIGTRAN interface

2005-04-01 Thread Race Vanderdecken
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Mueller Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 9:36 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Q.931 to SIGTRAN interface Hi, In response to: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2005-March/098214.html quote How

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Q.931 to SIGTRAN interface

2005-04-01 Thread Mike Mueller
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 05:32:43PM -0500, Race Vanderdecken wrote: Thanks Mike, I am getting letters from Europe for doing ISUP first, after the D-Channel and LDAP are working. LDAP or LAPD? If LAPD, then it would be best to avoid that protocol. It's another level 2 protocol chewing