bruce bruce wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I can connect the Jabra GN2124 + GN2100 (smart cord) to the Aastra 53i
receiver port and I get a tone. But when I connect it to the headset
port there is no tone. I am running firmware 2.4 and I can't seem to
find that DHSG, EHS or whatever the setting
Thanks. That is one thing I really HATE about AASTRA - them confusing the
user with providing different setting level on the WEB UI and the PHONE UI -
very stupid.
But thank you and it works just fine.
-Bruce
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Gareth Blades
list-aster...@skycomuk.comwrote:
Hi Everyone,
I can connect the Jabra GN2124 + GN2100 (smart cord) to the Aastra 53i
receiver port and I get a tone. But when I connect it to the headset port
there is no tone. I am running firmware 2.4 and I can't seem to find that
DHSG, EHS or whatever the setting maybe called to enable to get
I have a customer that is using a quad core xeon server with 4 GIG ram
and Te210P card.
Currently this machine is being used for calling out to their own people
as well other programs being run.
anyway they wish to start using it for a 30 person conference bridge.
I presume this is no issue???
On Tue, 18 May 2010, Jerry Geis wrote:
I have a customer that is using a quad core xeon server with 4 GIG ram
and Te210P card.
[snip]
anyway they wish to start using it for a 30 person conference bridge. I
presume this is no issue??? I am running centos 64 and asterisk 1.4.30
[snip]
I
Does the GotoIfTime application work in the local time of the server, or
UTC?
--
Alan Chandler
http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Alan Chandler wrote:
Does the GotoIfTime application work in the local time of the server, or
UTC?
Looking at the code, I'd say it was localtime of the server.
From pbx.c, in ast_check_timing() :
time(t);
localtime_r(t,tm);
Gordon
Is there any h323 channel driver that supports DTMF inband signalization?
Thank you for your answer!
--
Tomislav Parcina
tparcina#lama.hr
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update
Tomislav Parčina wrote:
Is there any h323 channel driver that supports DTMF inband signalization?
Thank you for your answer!
The native H.323 driver, chan_h323, does support inband DTMF.
Good Luck,
Jeremy McNamara
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation
Is there any h323 channel driver that supports DTMF inband signalization?
Thank you for your answer!
--
Tomislav
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
You could try chan_oh323.so and chan_h323.so. I think also ooh323
supports inband DTMFs.
Regards
Alberto Sagredo
Tomislav Parčina escribió:
Is there any h323 channel driver that supports DTMF inband signalization?
Thank you for your answer!
--
Tomislav
asterisk is running fine. I removed my 2 port TDM02B and now I must
compile ztdummy.
I edited the makefile changed the # ztdummy to just ztdummy (removed #).
recompiled.
did modprobe ztdummy and everything worked
However, now when I reboot it is not automatically loading ztdummy?
Should
On 13:28, Fri 30 Sep 05, Jerry Geis wrote:
asterisk is running fine. I removed my 2 port TDM02B and now I must
compile ztdummy.
I edited the makefile changed the # ztdummy to just ztdummy (removed #).
recompiled.
did modprobe ztdummy and everything worked
However, now when I reboot
On 13:28, Fri 30 Sep 05, Jerry Geis wrote:
/ asterisk is running fine. I removed my 2 port TDM02B and now I must
// compile ztdummy.
// I edited the makefile changed the # ztdummy to just ztdummy (removed #).
// recompiled.
// did modprobe ztdummy and everything worked
//
// However, now
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 08:35:19PM +0200, Michiel van Baak wrote:
On 13:28, Fri 30 Sep 05, Jerry Geis wrote:
asterisk is running fine. I removed my 2 port TDM02B and now I must
compile ztdummy.
I edited the makefile changed the # ztdummy to just ztdummy (removed #).
recompiled.
did
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 01:49:19PM -0500, Jerry Geis wrote:
On 13:28, Fri 30 Sep 05, Jerry Geis wrote:
/ asterisk is running fine. I removed my 2 port TDM02B and now I must
// compile ztdummy.
// I edited the makefile changed the # ztdummy to just ztdummy (removed
#). // recompiled.
// did
On 22:40, Fri 30 Sep 05, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 08:35:19PM +0200, Michiel van Baak wrote:
On 13:28, Fri 30 Sep 05, Jerry Geis wrote:
asterisk is running fine. I removed my 2 port TDM02B and now I must
compile ztdummy.
I edited the makefile changed the # ztdummy
How can I have asterisk ignore incoming rings so it doesn't answer a
specific line. I tried setting up an empty context section but that didn't
work.
Make a long delay the first line of the phone's context. This can even
be turned on and off using a few more lines.
How can I have asterisk ignore incoming rings so it doesn't answer a
specific line. I tried setting up an empty context section but that didn't
work.
What I did is this
[incoming-line-noanswer]
exten = s,1,Hangup
Works perfectly
Or, if you want your CDR to have the callerid, do it like
Hey Everyone,
How can I have asterisk ignore incoming rings so it
doesn't answer a specific line. I tried setting up an empty context
section but that didn't work.
Thanks
Dan
-
Dan Levine
CYTEXONE | Your Technology
Specialists t: 877.CYTEXONE x 810 l: 212.477.0990 x 810 e: [EMAIL
This will make it ring a phone forever until its picked up by a user
[incoming-line]
exten = s,1,Dial(SIP/whatever)
To ignore it toatally, drop all reference to it. If its analoge it'll
just ring and ring until the caller gives up.
Dan Levine wrote:
Hey Everyone,
How can I have asterisk ignore
Guys,
This is probably a stupid question, but I've got a client ordering service
from a CLEC and they're going with a fractional T1. Only 6 channels are
going to be voice. Is this a problem with the Wildcard T100P? We've only
worked with a full PRI before.
Thanks for any insight.
-Corey
On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 13:14 -0500, Corey S. McFadden wrote:
Guys,
This is probably a stupid question, but I've got a client ordering service
from a CLEC and they're going with a fractional T1. Only 6 channels are
going to be voice. Is this a problem with the Wildcard T100P? We've only
This tends to be a religious issue. I guess I am an older admin. :)
I come from the school of thought that it is a good idea to
reboot a server that is not meant to be used interactivly (console or
terminal) on a schedule. Most software does not require it. In my
experience, the systems
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, David H Hickman wrote:
This tends to be a religious issue. I guess I am an older admin. :)
I come from the school of thought that it is a good idea to
reboot a server that is not meant to be used interactivly (console or
terminal) on a schedule. Most software does
Hi All,
I have a quick question regarding restarting (and/or
stopping/restarting) asterisk daily -- Should it be done?
I've seen conflicting answers, some people have told me that the only
reason for asterisk to be stopped/started daily was for mpg123 causing
many childs, which has since been
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Quick question regarding daily restart of asterisk
Hi All,
I have a quick question regarding restarting (and/or
stopping/restarting) asterisk daily -- Should it be done?
I've seen conflicting answers, some people
I have a quick question regarding restarting (and/or
stopping/restarting) asterisk daily -- Should it be done?
I've seen conflicting answers, some people have told me that the only
reason for asterisk to be stopped/started daily was for mpg123 causing
many childs, which has since been
I can tell you from first hand experience that unless you've got +1000
extensions completely configured, it's not a problem in the slightest.
After that, you'll start getting to many files open messages (on a
vanilla system install) and the server will go temporarily unresponsive
(which can be
I'm using * under RH9...
When I go into production, I'll probably be changing distros, though.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Sussman
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 7:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Quick
WipeOut wrote:
David Sussman wrote:
Apologies if there is a cleanly written and searchable FAQ that I
could be
directed to. I have no problem to RTFM if I can find the FM...
Does Asterisk currently operate under RH9? I have IBM Netfinity 4000R
servers that do not support X windows under
Netfinity 4000R
servers that do not support X windows under RH8.x and I
prefer not to go
back to RH7.3...
I recall in the archives somewhere, and through someone's post earlier
today, that there is some sort of problem with RH9 with Zaptel (hardware)
drivers and that RH8 is
I recall in the archives somewhere, and through someone's post earlier
today, that there is some sort of problem with RH9 with Zaptel (hardware)
drivers and that RH8 is preferred.
Do you recall what kind of problem? The only problem I have is an annoying
echo that I haven't yet gotten rid
Apologies if there is a cleanly written and searchable FAQ that I could be
directed to. I have no problem to RTFM if I can find the FM...
Does Asterisk currently operate under RH9? I have IBM Netfinity 4000R
servers that do not support X windows under RH8.x and I prefer not to go
back to
Does Asterisk currently operate under RH9? I have IBM Netfinity 4000R
servers that do not support X windows under RH8.x and I prefer not to go
back to RH7.3...
yes, asterisk under rh 9.0 works good. I have 3 systems running with
that distro.
BTW, where would I find a useful FM?
At 05:15 PM 11/1/2003, you wrote:
Apologies if there is a cleanly written and searchable FAQ that I could be
directed to. I have no problem to RTFM if I can find the FM...
Does Asterisk currently operate under RH9? I have IBM Netfinity 4000R
servers that do not support X windows under RH8.x and
Netfinity 4000R
servers that do not support X windows under RH8.x and I
prefer not to go
back to RH7.3...
I recall in the archives somewhere, and through someone's post earlier
today, that there is some sort of problem with RH9 with Zaptel (hardware)
drivers and that RH8 is preferred.
There are links to several other Asterisk related sites at the bottom of
the page at http://www.fnords.org/~eric/asterisk/
On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 18:26, Brancaleoni Matteo wrote:
Does Asterisk currently operate under RH9? I have IBM Netfinity 4000R
servers that do not support X windows under
At 05:03 PM 11/1/2003, you wrote:
Netfinity 4000R
servers that do not support X windows under RH8.x and I
prefer not to go
back to RH7.3...
I recall in the archives somewhere, and through someone's post earlier
today, that there is some sort of problem with RH9 with Zaptel (hardware)
drivers
39 matches
Mail list logo
