On 1/23/06, Doug Lytle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Further, Polycom SIP phones have the longest boot time of any phone
I've ever seen (something like 5 min, compared to a Sipure, less than
Give a SIP based Cisco 79XX phone a try, just about as long in boot time.
Huh? My 7905 takes well under
I don't think you can beat the Polycom's for design, features, configuration
options and functionality tho. :)
Polycoms (I only have experience with a ip500) have many qualities.
However, I think it's only a matter of time before entries at the
$180-$200 price point begin beating it in many
!
-Original Message-
From: Wilson Pickett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 6:19 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Polycom FW
I don't think you can beat the Polycom's for design, features, configuration
options
Douglas Garstang wrote:
We conducted focus groups, looking at several different vendors, before we
decided to go with the Polycom. From the user interface perspective, the
Polycom's won hands down. I was never involved with it, but apparently to
configure the Cisco's you need to be
Doug Lytle wrote:
Douglas Garstang wrote:
We conducted focus groups, looking at several different vendors,
before we decided to go with the Polycom. From the user interface
perspective, the Polycom's won hands down. I was never involved with
it, but apparently to configure the Cisco's you
Thread hijack - grr!
On 23-Jan-06, at 7:37 AM, Brian Capouch wrote:
Doug Lytle wrote:
Douglas Garstang wrote:
We conducted focus groups, looking at several different vendors,
before we decided to go with the Polycom. From the user interface
perspective, the Polycom's won hands
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Douglas Garstang wrote:
We conducted focus groups, looking at several different vendors, before
we decided to go with the Polycom. From the user interface perspective,
the Polycom's won hands down. I was never involved with it, but
apparently to configure the Cisco's
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 1/23/2006 10:49 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Cc:
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Polycom FW
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Douglas Garstang wrote:
We conducted
I second your opinion that Polycom needs to change their policy on this.
Strengthening the Reseller Channels is one of the more nonsensical
justifications for not publicly providing updates for their own product.
Especially in light of the fact that you can easily and legally get
the source
-Commercial Discussion
Cc:
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Polycom FW
I second your opinion that Polycom needs to change their policy on
this.
Strengthening the Reseller Channels is one of the more nonsensical
justifications for not publicly
Wilson Pickett wrote:
Further, Polycom SIP phones have the longest boot time of any phone
I've ever seen (something like 5 min, compared to a Sipure, less than
Give a SIP based Cisco 79XX phone a try, just about as long in boot time.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up
Hi Bill -
Thank you to all who responded to my inquiry below. As explained by a
few people, Polycom has a policy of withholding current firmware
releases from users, thus forcing them to contact authorized resellers
for support should they need this code. Similar to another reported
12 matches
Mail list logo
