Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP URIs and ENUM or other types of lookup

2003-11-22 Thread Olle E. Johansson
But that would sort of break SIP. A SIP URI is [EMAIL PROTECTED], so it makes No, A SIP URI is [EMAIL PROTECTED] - there's a big difference. Read on DNS SRV records on http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=DNS%20SRV Quoting myself: No one really mails [EMAIL PROTECTED] any more. We're

Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP URIs and ENUM or other types of lookup

2003-11-22 Thread asterisk
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 11:28:34AM +0100, Olle E. Johansson wrote: Quoting myself: No one really mails [EMAIL PROTECTED] any more. We're mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the DNS MX records helps the mail client to send the mail to the correct mail server. Why should we call [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Asterisk-Users] SIP URIs and ENUM or other types of lookup

2003-11-20 Thread asterisk
This has been giving me a headache for a little while, so I thought I would throw the question out to the list. Imagine there is a database lookup function that takes place that, given a number, returns call routing information. It might be a postgresql lookup, it might be an enum lookup. If I

Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP URIs and ENUM or other types of lookup

2003-11-20 Thread Maik Schmitt
*.3.9.3.0.0 IN NAPTR 100 100 u SIP+E2U !^+*00393(.*)!sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] . *.0.0.7.1 IN NAPTR 100 100 u IAX2+E2U !^+*(.*)!iax2:iaxtel/\1! . They won't work since the pattern matching and replacement code is unimplemented. (not to mention the fact that bind barfs on the