Re: [asterisk-users] [SOT] Virtualising Asterisk

2011-05-09 Thread Jan Bakuwel
Hi Phil, Happily running with the following here: dom0: Debian Lenny Xen 3.2-1 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 domU: Asterisk 1.4 Debian Lenny 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 domU: Asterisk 1.6 Debian Squeeze 2.6.32-5-amd64 (which is a Xen-aware kernel) domU: Asterisk 1.8 Debian Squeeze 2.6.32-5-amd64 (which is a

Re: [asterisk-users] [SOT] Virtualising Asterisk

2011-05-08 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 04:24:08PM +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote: I know a lot has changed over the past couple of years, and even monthly, and that Asterisk running within a virtualised environment is very happy indeed. If one would only be using SIP/IAX would Xen/KVM be the best solution ? /

Re: [asterisk-users] [SOT] Virtualising Asterisk

2011-05-08 Thread Hans Witvliet
On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 16:24 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote: I know a lot has changed over the past couple of years, and even monthly, and that Asterisk running within a virtualised environment is very happy indeed. If one would only be using SIP/IAX would Xen/KVM be the best solution ? / or

[asterisk-users] [SOT] Virtualising Asterisk

2011-05-07 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
I know a lot has changed over the past couple of years, and even monthly, and that Asterisk running within a virtualised environment is very happy indeed. If one would only be using SIP/IAX would Xen/KVM be the best solution ? / or perhaps VServer/LXC maybe advantageous due to binary hashing.