:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grey Man
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 12:35 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's
- Original Message
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List
- Original Message
From: Mindaugas Kezys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, 1 February, 2008 4:04:30 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's
For
such
cases
we
It's not Asterisk, it's SIP. Transfer takes the signaling off the
Asterisk box.
In features.conf, replace blind transfer with a call to a macro. Then
redo your dialplan with the 'g' option on inward dial commands. When
the called party uses the transfer command, your macro should read the
On 1/29/08, Richard Revels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not Asterisk, it's SIP. Transfer takes the signaling off the
Asterisk box.
In features.conf, replace blind transfer with a call to a macro. Then
redo your dialplan with the 'g' option on inward dial commands. When
the called party
- Original Message
From: Richard Revels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, 29 January, 2008 12:21:16 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's
It's not Asterisk
Disbaling transfers is an attractive option from my point of view but not
from my customer's. Being able to transfer an incoming call from the
receptionist to the required person is something businesses will consider
changing provider for in my experience.
The provider can disable
- Original Message
From: C F [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, 29 January, 2008 8:05:00 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's
Grey,
Just tested with 1.2.13
Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Asterisk is doing exactly as it should.. when it steps out of the media
path, the CDR is also dropped, as asterisk is no longer responsible for
that call.
Even if Asterisk stays in the media path, the CDR's are dropped.
It is an annoying problem. Hopefully the
- Original Message
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, 29 January, 2008 7:28:32 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's
Grey,
I don't think you
Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, 29 January, 2008 12:21:16 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's
It's not Asterisk, it's SIP. Transfer takes the signaling off the
Asterisk box.
In features.conf, replace blind transfer
: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's
It's not Asterisk, it's SIP. Transfer takes the signaling off the
Asterisk box.
In features.conf, replace blind transfer with a call to a macro.
Then
redo your dialplan with the 'g' option on inward dial commands. When
Hi Matt,
Sadly I understand all to well how transfers work. I've had to go over and
over this for the last 12 months trying to find different ways of handling
it. I'm talking about blind and attended call transfers here not IAX or any
other kind. We are not taking Asterisk out of the
Grey Man wrote:
That will work for blind transfers but not attended and even in the blind
transfer case the CDR's still aren't correct you're relying on an
informational field.
I think there is an important point being missed here; Asterisk did not
originate the concept of CDRs, nor did it
- Original Message
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, 29 January, 2008 8:39:25 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's
Grey... I'm not debating
- Original Message
From: Kevin P. Fleming [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, 29 January, 2008 9:34:23 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's
Grey Man wrote
- Original Message
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, 29 January, 2008 9:24:14 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's
The provider can
] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's
Grey,
Just tested with 1.2.13
Asterisk always (blind or attd xfer) creates 2 records.
A few points, NEVER rely on source as the billable number.
Always use account codes.
Match the lastdata field against dst fields to figure out that it was
an xfer when
Hi All,
PLEASE READ if you depend on Asterisk CDR's and support transfers.
Apologies for the shout but I'm desperate to get others to agree Asterisk has a
big problem with the CDR's that are generated for transfers. I can understand
why not too many people are interested as transfers are
18 matches
Mail list logo
