Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA with heartbeat and systemd

2015-10-19 22:05 GMT+02:00 Telium Technical Support : > If you’re still in the planning stage, there’s a lot more to think about. > Your Asterisk failure detection will be very simplistic (is the process > dead). Synchronization of data – without risking synchronization of >

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA with heartbeat and systemd

My machines have both a /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/asterisk file (from resource-agents package, it seems). If I'm not mistaken, this file is not run when asterisk is started/stopped by hb_standby/hb_takeover commands (I added a touch /tmp/foobar line in

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA with heartbeat and systemd

If you’re still in the planning stage, there’s a lot more to think about. Your Asterisk failure detection will be very simplistic (is the process dead). Synchronization of data – without risking synchronization of corrupt data to a peer. Prevent a deteriorating/failing peer corruption from

[asterisk-users] Asterisk HA with heartbeat and systemd

Hello, I'm setting up an active-passive Asterisk solution on Debian Jessie platforms. I'm using heartbeat package. As I'm not yet familiar with either systemd or heartbeat, I've got a couple of questions: 1. At the moment, I'm using /usr/share/heartbeat/hb_standby or

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA

On 6/6/13 4:53 am, Gopalakrishnan N wrote: Any other HA applications available or the lsyncd with pacemaker is good? I generally use Pacemaker with Heartbeat, which seems to work pretty well. Kind regards, Chris -- This email is made from 100% recycled electrons --

[asterisk-users] Asterisk HA

I was go through'ing the following links for HA, https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/TOP/Failover+-+Linux - which doesn't have file syncing. https://www.johncahill.net/wiki/index.php/2_Node_Active/Passive_cluster - this one has file syncing with pacemaker Any other HA applications available

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk HA for queue calls

From: DHAVAL INDRODIYA dhaval.it01...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk HA for queue calls To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Message-ID: BANLkTi=ypq1up4ti35-ljzbw9_ju+v9...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset

[asterisk-users] asterisk HA for queue calls

Hello List, We are running two asterisk machines in virtual IP as primary and secondary server. Initially virtual IP will be active in primary server; during the failure of primary secondary will get the virtual IP. Is there any way to retrieve pending queue calls from primary to secondary, in

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk HA for queue calls

Hi Rajib, I think It is not possible with asterisk , as primary server goes down it will stop asterisk services so once asterisk service down i think all connected calls to queue will hangup automatically, and you cannot retrive those calls as they all are disconnected . I think you need to

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA Current Thoughts (Centos 5.3 Platform)

Sent: Friday, October 2, 2009 1:58:15 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA Current Thoughts (Centos 5.3 Platform) I'm looking into doing an HA setup for a Asterisk 1.4 install on Centos. I've seen a number of different pointers to packages for this some of which

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA Current Thoughts (Centos 5.3 Platform)

-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA Current Thoughts (Centos 5.3 Platform) Google for some of the How Tos built around Elastix and Trixbox. Both of these are CentOS based as well. good luck. - Original Message - From: James Hankins j...@allpointsmediaworks.com

[asterisk-users] Asterisk HA Current Thoughts (Centos 5.3 Platform)

I'm looking into doing an HA setup for a Asterisk 1.4 install on Centos. I've seen a number of different pointers to packages for this some of which are packages that seem quite dated from an update perspective (Ultra Monkey links I've seen haven't been updated in a while). What is the

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA Current Thoughts (Centos 5.3 Platform)

I have been working on a HA procedure for Asterisk on CentOS 5.3, but haven't had time to publish it. It is a little complex, but here are the components used: - CentOS 5.3 - Asterisk 1.6 (version doesn't matter) - MySQL - Cluster services - GFS2 - DRBD A basic run-down is: * Two servers

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA Current Thoughts (Centos 5.3 Platform)

* Two servers configured with DRBD in Master-Master mode.  All data is replicated between the two so in case of a failure there should be very limited data loss (voicemail) if any at all. If you put the asterisk spool, lib, and config files on the DRBD then you shouldn't lose voicemail or any

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA Current Thoughts (Centos 5.3 Platform)

On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Fred Posner f...@teamforrest.com wrote: * Two servers configured with DRBD in Master-Master mode.  All data is replicated between the two so in case of a failure there should be very limited data loss (voicemail) if any at all. If you put the asterisk spool,

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA

2007/1/11, Ale [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Ciao, Enrico Pasqualotto wrote: Is better ultramonkey, dundi or SER proxy in front of * server? You can also consider Hartbeat + rsync, or simply pfsync + rsync ;) The problem with Asterisk HA, is mainly the lost of calls when failover occurs. This is

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA

Ciao, Enrico Pasqualotto wrote: Is better ultramonkey, dundi or SER proxy in front of * server? You can also consider Hartbeat + rsync, or simply pfsync + rsync ;) Thanks Enrico Ciao Ciao , Ale ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by

[asterisk-users] Asterisk HA

Hi all, I have to make for a client an asterisk system for process up to 250 calls between conference and normal call. At disposition I have 4 xserver 346 with dual xeon 3.0Ghz and the client require a failover system. Anyone have experience for this type of solution? Is better ultramonkey,