Re: [asterisk-users] conferencing without DAHDI

2010-02-09 Thread Klaus Darilion
Am 08.02.2010 21:15, schrieb Philippe Sultan: Philippe, what exactly is a playback channel? Is it a pseudo participant playing back the announcements? Yes. Announcements are played to the conference members by creating a channel of type 'Bridge' which streams the sound files. thanks

Re: [asterisk-users] conferencing without DAHDI

2010-02-09 Thread David Backeberg
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Klaus Darilion klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at wrote: I wonder what mute should mean. Does it mean that the participant will not receive any media, or that media sent by the participant will be ignored, or both? Please post your discoveries to:

Re: [asterisk-users] conferencing without DAHDI

2010-02-09 Thread Klaus Darilion
Am 09.02.2010 15:35, schrieb David Backeberg: On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Klaus Darilion klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at wrote: I wonder what mute should mean. Does it mean that the participant will not receive any media, or that media sent by the participant will be ignored, or both?

Re: [asterisk-users] conferencing without DAHDI

2010-02-09 Thread David Backeberg
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Klaus Darilion klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at wrote: Answering myself: muting means that the participants voice is ignored. Thank you for updating the wiki and the list. I looked into this when I was having problems with early 1.6.0.* MeetMe(), specifically the

[asterisk-users] conferencing without DAHDI

2010-02-08 Thread Klaus Darilion
Hi! IIRC there was an announcement some time ago that it is possible now to make conferences without the need for DAHDI anymore - but I can not remember the name of this feature anymore, and google didn't solved my problem. Thus, any references to this new system are appreciated. thanks

Re: [asterisk-users] conferencing without DAHDI

2010-02-08 Thread Olle E. Johansson
8 feb 2010 kl. 12.29 skrev Klaus Darilion: Hi! IIRC there was an announcement some time ago that it is possible now to make conferences without the need for DAHDI anymore - but I can not remember the name of this feature anymore, and google didn't solved my problem. Thus, any

Re: [asterisk-users] conferencing without DAHDI

2010-02-08 Thread Philippe Sultan
Hi Klaus, The module is app_confbridge, and the application is ConfBridge. I had been using it for a while because it's really easy to use : you don't need any configuration file, and you get cool announcements upon conference events from a playback channel. The options work pretty much like

Re: [asterisk-users] conferencing without DAHDI

2010-02-08 Thread Philippe Sultan
And by the way, app_confbridge is included in the 1.6.2 series (at least). On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Philippe Sultan philippe.sul...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Klaus, The module is app_confbridge, and the application is ConfBridge. I had been using it for a while because it's really easy to

Re: [asterisk-users] conferencing without DAHDI

2010-02-08 Thread Klaus Darilion
Hi Philippe! Am 08.02.2010 13:49, schrieb Philippe Sultan: Hi Klaus, The module is app_confbridge, and the application is ConfBridge. I had been using it for a while because it's really easy to use : you don't need any configuration file, and you get cool announcements upon conference

Re: [asterisk-users] conferencing without DAHDI

2010-02-08 Thread Klaus Darilion
Am 08.02.2010 13:49, schrieb Philippe Sultan: Hi Klaus, The module is app_confbridge, and the application is ConfBridge. I had been using it for a while because it's really easy to use : you don't need any configuration file, and you get cool announcements upon conference events from a

Re: [asterisk-users] conferencing without DAHDI

2010-02-08 Thread Philippe Sultan
Philippe, what exactly is a playback channel? Is it a pseudo participant playing back the announcements? Yes. Announcements are played to the conference members by creating a channel of type 'Bridge' which streams the sound files. thanks klaus Further, is there somewhere a documentation

[asterisk-users] Conferencing and web front-end

2009-08-13 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
would somebody be able to recommend a good package that works with Asterisk please ... not commercial as will be mainly used for my home office. Best Regards, -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content and is believed to be clean. SplatNIX IT Services :: Innovation

Re: [asterisk-users] Conferencing Hardware

2008-09-29 Thread Gordon Henderson
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, Jim Boykin wrote: Thanks Gordon Mike for the response. What accuracy are you getting from zaptest/dahdi_test (and system info). Two more questions: 1) Does ztdummy requires change into kernel? I am running 2.6.9 kernel. 2) What about CPU load? I run a custom

[asterisk-users] Conferencing Hardware

2008-09-28 Thread Jim Boykin
We plan to use asterisk for conferencing. As I understand, it requires either a separate hardware like x100p clone or ztdummy. What are the pro cons of x100p vs ztdummy. Any other hardware suggestions for conferencing? It should be able to handle few simultaneous conferences. Thanks Jim

Re: [asterisk-users] Conferencing Hardware

2008-09-28 Thread Gordon Henderson
On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, Jim Boykin wrote: We plan to use asterisk for conferencing. As I understand, it requires either a separate hardware like x100p clone or ztdummy. What are the pro cons of x100p vs ztdummy. Any other hardware suggestions for conferencing? It should be able to handle few

Re: [asterisk-users] Conferencing Hardware

2008-09-28 Thread Mike Trest
Go for it. ztdummy is not an issue. I have used ztdummy with 220 simultaneous participants in 18 different conference groups. At one time, I had 60 machines running simultaneously in a FARM all of which were carrying the same 18 conference groups with over 200 participants active on each

Re: [asterisk-users] Conferencing Hardware

2008-09-28 Thread Jim Boykin
Thanks Gordon Mike for the response. What accuracy are you getting from zaptest/dahdi_test (and system info). Two more questions: 1) Does ztdummy requires change into kernel? I am running 2.6.9 kernel. 2) What about CPU load? Thanks Jim On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 5:02 AM, Mike Trest [EMAIL

Re: [asterisk-users] Conferencing..

2008-04-15 Thread Alex Balashov
Ajey Gore wrote: I figured that asterisk can do conferencing if we have zap interface. The BRI cards I have they do not have Zaptel. How do I enable conferencing on my server? What do you mean when you describe cards as having or not having Zaptel? -- Alex Balashov Evariste Systems Web:

Re: [asterisk-users] Conferencing..

2008-04-15 Thread gincantalupo
Hi Ajey, which kind of BRI are you using? Giorgio Incantalupo Ajey Gore wrote: I figured that asterisk can do conferencing if we have zap interface. The BRI cards I have they do not have Zaptel. How do I enable conferencing on my server? Regards Ajey

Re: [asterisk-users] Conferencing..

2008-04-15 Thread Faraz R. Khan
You can do conferencing without the zap interface. just modprobe ztdummy. Its good for small conferences. On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 23:39 -0500, Ajey Gore wrote: I figured that asterisk can do conferencing if we have zap interface. The BRI cards I have they do not have Zaptel. How do I enable

Re: [asterisk-users] Conferencing..

2008-04-15 Thread Gordon Henderson
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Ajey Gore wrote: I figured that asterisk can do conferencing if we have zap interface. It can do conferencing without a zap interface too. The BRI cards I have they do not have Zaptel. And? How do I enable conferencing on my server? Well you could start by reading

Re: [asterisk-users] Conferencing..

2008-04-15 Thread gincantalupo
Hi Faraz, yes, you can use ztdummy but it cannot completely replace Digium cards. It depends from your hardwareI had troubles with some kind of serversso beware. Giorgio. Faraz R. Khan wrote: You can do conferencing without the zap interface. just modprobe ztdummy. Its good for small

[asterisk-users] Conferencing..

2008-04-14 Thread Ajey Gore
I figured that asterisk can do conferencing if we have zap interface. The BRI cards I have they do not have Zaptel. How do I enable conferencing on my server? Regards Ajey ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

Re: [asterisk-users] conferencing help

2008-01-09 Thread Matt Riddell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nhadie wrote: Hi Matt, I tried /usr/local/src/zaptel-1.2.22.1# ./zttest -v and it just freezes at this. Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... no more outputs, when i cancelled this is what i got. --- Results after 0

Re: [asterisk-users] conferencing help

2008-01-09 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 03:36:06PM +0800, Nhadie wrote: Hi Matt, I tried /usr/local/src/zaptel-1.2.22.1# ./zttest -v and it just freezes at this. Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... no more outputs, when i cancelled this is what i got. --- Results after 0 passes

Re: [asterisk-users] conferencing help

2008-01-09 Thread Nhadie
Hi Tzafrir, cat /proc/zaptel/* Span 1: ZTDUMMY/1 ZTDUMMY/1 1 Kernel: 2.6.18-5-686 #1 SMP Zaptel: zaptel-1.2.20.1 OS: Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 i downgraded my zaptel from 1.2.22.1 to 1.2.20.1 but still the same. thanks again regards, nhadie Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at

Re: [asterisk-users] conferencing help

2008-01-08 Thread Nhadie
Hi Steve, I see. I have this now, *CLI zap show channels Chan Extension Context Language MusicOnHold pseudodefault en *CLI load chan_zap.so Unable to load module chan_zap.so -- on the log file it says, it as already loaded that's why it's unable to

Re: [asterisk-users] conferencing help

2008-01-08 Thread Matt Riddell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nhadie wrote: Hi Steve, I see. I have this now, *CLI zap show channels Chan Extension Context Language MusicOnHold pseudodefault en That means the zap channel should be ok. One thing you could do is go

Re: [asterisk-users] conferencing help

2008-01-08 Thread gary
I will be out of the office on Wednesday, January 9, 2008. If this is an emergency, please call Customer Service at (877) 791-7700. Thank you. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To

Re: [asterisk-users] conferencing help

2008-01-08 Thread Nhadie
Hi Matt, I tried /usr/local/src/zaptel-1.2.22.1# ./zttest -v and it just freezes at this. Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... no more outputs, when i cancelled this is what i got. --- Results after 0 passes --- Best: 0.00 -- Worst: 100.00 -- Average: 100.00 does

Re: [asterisk-users] conferencing help

2008-01-07 Thread Nhadie
Hi Matt, it seems i don't have that command. *CLI zap show channels No such command 'zap' (type 'help' for help) *CLI ! abort add ael agent agi cdr databasedebug dnsmgr dontdump dundi extensions feature group help

Re: [asterisk-users] conferencing help

2008-01-07 Thread Matt Riddell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nhadie wrote: Hi Matt, it seems i don't have that command. :) You'll need to make sure that: 1. You have zaptel compiled 2. You compile Asterisk *after* zaptel is compiled and installed 3. You have either modprobed zaptel + ztdummy or made the

Re: [asterisk-users] conferencing help

2008-01-07 Thread Paul Hales
Then it's time to build zaptel, then rebuild asterisk later, PaulH On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 13:16 +0800, Nhadie wrote: Hi Matt, it seems i don't have that command. *CLI zap show channels No such command 'zap' (type 'help' for help) *CLI ! abort add ael

Re: [asterisk-users] conferencing help

2008-01-07 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 06:45:14PM +1300, Matt Riddell wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nhadie wrote: Hi Matt, it seems i don't have that command. :) You'll need to make sure that: 1. You have zaptel compiled 2. You compile Asterisk *after* zaptel is

Re: [asterisk-users] conferencing help

2008-01-07 Thread Matt Riddell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tzafrir Cohen wrote: (This tests both cases right away: gives different error messages in the different cases) Sweet :) - -- Kind Regards, Matt Riddell Director ___ http://www.venturevoip.com (Great

[asterisk-users] Conferencing Phones ...

2007-02-09 Thread Gordon Henderson
Anyone got any experiences of good quality VoIP conferencing phones? I've used Polycom analogue units in the past, and I see that they have a SIP version (the IP4000) - but it is better/worse/as good as an analogue version? (ie. would I be better off with an analogue version into a TDM card

RE: [asterisk-users] Conferencing Phones ...

2007-02-09 Thread Watkins, Bradley
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gordon Henderson Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 9:47 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Conferencing Phones ... Anyone got any experiences

RE: [asterisk-users] Conferencing Phones ...

2007-02-09 Thread Greg Scasny
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gordon Henderson Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 8:47 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Conferencing Phones ... Anyone got any experiences of good quality VoIP conferencing phones? I've used

[asterisk-users] Conferencing Issue please help

2006-11-29 Thread Ishanka Anuradha Ranasooriya
Hi All, I have a problem in configuring in asterisk. I configure asterisk meetme.conf and extension.conf, but when i transfer call to conference it give me this message and asterisk kill it self. Ouch ... error while writing audio data: : Broken pipe If any one knows

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Conferencing with multiple servers

2006-06-21 Thread Cesc
List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Conferencing with multiple servers On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 15:22 +0100, Wildheart wrote: Hi, I am trying to join 2 asterisk servers together using a sip channel. This is so, if a user joins a conference on box

[Asterisk-Users] Conferencing with multiple servers

2006-06-20 Thread Wildheart
Hi, I am trying to join 2 asterisk servers together using a sip channel. This is so, if a user joins a conference on box A and another user joins a conference on box B, providing they are in the same conference room, the two conferences are joined via the sip channel. We only want to join the

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Conferencing with multiple servers

2006-06-20 Thread Patrick
On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 15:22 +0100, Wildheart wrote: Hi, I am trying to join 2 asterisk servers together using a sip channel. This is so, if a user joins a conference on box A and another user joins a conference on box B, providing they are in the same conference room, the two conferences

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Conferencing with multiple servers

2006-06-20 Thread Douglas Garstang
-Original Message- From: Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 12:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Conferencing with multiple servers On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 15:22 +0100

[Asterisk-Users] Conferencing without Meetme

2005-02-07 Thread Juan Jose Comellas
I'm currently writing some code to support conferencing in Asterisk without using the Meetme application. The conference runs in its own thread and every new inbound or outbound channel that is created is passed to it. This thread runs the conference loop reading and writing frames to each

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Conferencing without Meetme

2005-02-07 Thread Peter Svensson
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Juan Jose Comellas wrote: I'm currently writing some code to support conferencing in Asterisk without using the Meetme application. The conference runs in its own thread and every new inbound or outbound channel that is created is passed to it. This thread runs the

[Asterisk-Users] Conferencing needs Zaptel ??

2004-11-12 Thread Paulo Adriano
Hi All, This are going nice with my setup, but I m now trying to play with conferencig. My setup uses a isdn4linux card with no zaptel drivers. When trying configs for conferencing I m getting this errors bellow . What do I need to do to install this pseudo drivers ? Thanks in advance, Paulo

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Conferencing needs Zaptel ??

2004-11-12 Thread Jefferson Carvalho
Dear Paulo , You need *ztdummy* for conferencing (Meetme). -Jefferson Carvalho Paulo Adriano wrote: Hi All, This are going nice with my setup, but I m now trying to play with conferencig. My setup uses a isdn4linux card with no zaptel drivers. When trying configs for conferencing I m getting this

[Asterisk-Users] Conferencing -- app_meetme, app_meetme2, app_conference

2004-10-10 Thread Steve Edwards
I want to build a conferencing system and I'm looking for suggestions on which application will make a better starting point. A conference consists of: up to 20 callers, a small number (1-3) of agents and a small number of supervisors (0-3). Multiple conferences will be active on the same host

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Conferencing Calls on Cisco 7940

2003-10-07 Thread Juan J. Sierralta P.
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 20:47, Brian West wrote: Works fine on my 7960 with 5.3 firmware. bkw Im having a similar problem with my 7960 when I receive two incoming calls I cannot join them. Hello, I am trying to conference two or more calls on a Cisco 7940 phone. When I have

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Conferencing Calls on Cisco 7940

2003-10-07 Thread Brian West
Im having a similar problem with my 7960 when I receive two incoming calls I cannot join them. ya you can't join them. That sucks.. but you can park one call, go back to call number 1. Press conf. Dial the parking orbit.. then press join! bkw

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Conferencing Calls on Cisco 7940

2003-10-07 Thread Juan J. Sierralta P.
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 12:09, Brian West wrote: Im having a similar problem with my 7960 when I receive two incoming calls I cannot join them. ya you can't join them. That sucks.. but you can park one call, go back to call number 1. Press conf. Dial the parking orbit.. then press

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Conferencing Calls on Cisco 7940

2003-10-07 Thread Brian West
I dont see it as a bug.. I see why it don't work.. and why people think it should. Enable # transfers.. and setup call parking to get around this. Also if you conf very much look at app_meetme. bkw On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Juan J. Sierralta P. wrote: On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 12:09, Brian West wrote:

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Conferencing Calls on Cisco 7940

2003-10-07 Thread Babak Pasdar
Brian, Would you be kind enough to give me a brief overview of why it doesnt work. I also appreciate the work aorund. This is something I will have to educate my soon to be users on. We do a lot of conferencing of calls as a matter of facilitating clients' immediate needs. For now I will

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Conferencing Calls on Cisco 7940

2003-10-07 Thread Juan J. Sierralta P.
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 15:38, Brian West wrote: I dont see it as a bug.. I see why it don't work.. and why people think it should. Enable # transfers.. and setup call parking to get around this. Also if you conf very much look at app_meetme. I did it, problem that I have now is the

[Asterisk-Users] Conferencing Calls on Cisco 7940

2003-10-06 Thread Babak Pasdar
Hello, I am trying to conference two or more calls on a Cisco 7940 phone. When I have one inbound call and one outbound (I initiate the second call by pressing conference) I get the join button at the bottom of the screen and I can conference. When I initiate both calls or I receive both

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Conferencing Calls on Cisco 7940

2003-10-06 Thread Brian West
Works fine on my 7960 with 5.3 firmware. bkw On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Babak Pasdar wrote: Hello, I am trying to conference two or more calls on a Cisco 7940 phone. When I have one inbound call and one outbound (I initiate the second call by pressing conference) I get the join button at the

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Conferencing : authentication

2003-06-04 Thread Mark Spencer
The key functionality isn't in Asterisk right now, but someone has notified us that they've written it. We're waiting to get the patch and disclaimer from them to incorporate the changes. In the mean time you can use Authenticate application: exten = 8600,1,Authenticate(4321) exten =

[Asterisk-Users] Conferencing : authentication

2003-06-03 Thread Rahul Gupta
Hello ! I made some changes in the extension.conf to make * ask for a key when a person enters a conference room. But it is not asking for any key and takes the user directly to the conference room. I am using sip softphones as end points connected to sip for conferencing. Any pointers for the