Re: [asterisk-users] G729

>>> And I'm not at all against Digium making money. But this whole 729 thing is >>> a mystery without any official feedback... Not an official statement from Digium, but at the top of that thread, it says it all: "david551 Sep '17 It still need copyright licensing. You will need to find an

Re: [asterisk-users] G729

Hmmm, again, this conversation has just faded out. I wondered why no response from Digium? So I found this discussion - https://community.asterisk.org/t/why-does-g729-still-require-licensing/71920/8 - seems very clear that G729 is patent free, but still no response from Digium. Also, the link to

[asterisk-users] ​G729 (Dmitry Melekhov)

n, 23 Jul 2018 08:36:19 +0400 > From: Dmitry Melekhov > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] G729 > Message-ID: <24c4a934-5210-9df4-f9e0-e5681b22b...@belkam.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed" >

Re: [asterisk-users] G729

20.07.2018 23:35, John Kiniston пишет: On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:41 AM Saint Michael > wrote: ​The community would benefit if a non/licensed version of G729 would be included with Asterisk​, since the license expired. The current codec source

Re: [asterisk-users] G729

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:41 AM Saint Michael wrote: > ​The community would benefit if a non/licensed version of G729 would be >> included with Asterisk​, since the license expired. The current codec >> source code posted still requires licensing. >> > ​I am sure Digium would not prefer to ​ >

[asterisk-users] G729

> > ​The community would benefit if a non/licensed version of G729 would be > included with Asterisk​, since the license expired. The current codec > source code posted still requires licensing. > ​I am sure Digium would not prefer to ​ ​acknowledge this, but the phenomenal growth of Asterisk is

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Licensing Revisited - I'm Sorry!

Hello Everyone, Thank your for your response. There are two critical questions I would like clarified kindly: 1) We do not perform any transcoding whatsoever. All recordings, and voice mail are in G729, and allow=g729 for all peers and in sip.conf. Is there anything else we need to perform g729

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Licensing Revisited - I'm Sorry!

1) We do not perform any transcoding whatsoever. All recordings, and voice mail are in G729, and allow=g729 for all peers and in sip.conf. Is there anything else we need to perform g729 passthrough. More importantly are we still liable? Given that most vendors support G729, why do some still

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Licensing Revisited - I'm Sorry!

On 2014-02-28 14:04, Tahir Almas wrote: 1) We do not perform any transcoding whatsoever. All recordings, and voice mail are in G729, and allow=g729 for all peers and in sip.conf. Is there anything else we need to perform g729 passthrough. More importantly are we still liable?

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Licensing Revisited - I'm Sorry!

On Friday 28 Feb 2014, Tahir Almas wrote: As earlier referred following quote from their site DISCLAIMER: You might have to pay royalty fees to the G.729/723.1 patent holders for using their algorithm You have to pay royalty fee for using their algorithm and it does not matter whether

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Licensing Revisited - I'm Sorry!

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:55 PM, Darryl Moore dar...@moores.ca wrote: On Feb 27, 2014 10:02 PM, Paul Belanger paul.belan...@polybeacon.com wrote: No such thing as 'free open source g729 license', if you actually read the site: There is regarding the copyright on the code. The fact it

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Licensing Revisited - I'm Sorry!

On 2/28/14, Johann Steinwendtner steinwendt...@gmx.net wrote: On 2014-02-28 14:04, Tahir Almas wrote: 1) We do not perform any transcoding whatsoever. All recordings, and voice mail are in G729, and allow=g729 for all peers and in sip.conf. Is there anything else we need to

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Licensing Revisited - I'm Sorry!

Correct, I didn't mention this, since I was assuming OP was talking about getting it into production. Should have been more clear. Sorry I should clarify. We were incubated for the testing period however now will be depolying for commercial use. That being said, we do feel the need to

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Licensing Revisited - I'm Sorry!

-users] G729 Licensing Revisited - I'm Sorry! On 2/28/14, Johann Steinwendtner steinwendt...@gmx.net wrote: On 2014-02-28 14:04, Tahir Almas wrote: 1) We do not perform any transcoding whatsoever. All recordings, and voice mail are in G729, and allow=g729 for all peers and in sip.conf

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Licensing Revisited - I'm Sorry!

To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Licensing Revisited - I'm Sorry! Correct, I didn't mention this, since I was assuming OP was talking about getting it into production. Should have been more clear. Sorry I should clarify. We were

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Licensing Revisited - I'm Sorry!

On 28/2/14 9:04 pm, Jayson Devor wrote: That being said, will purchasing 23 licenses (one for each channel that we use), and continue to use the open source g729 sorftware keep us legal? I know at least half a dozen people who do this so that they can more effectively balance their licence

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Licensing Revisited - I'm Sorry!

] On Behalf Of Chris Bagnall Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 4:28 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Licensing Revisited - I'm Sorry! On 28/2/14 9:04 pm, Jayson Devor wrote: That being said, will purchasing 23 licenses (one for each channel that we use

[asterisk-users] G729 Licensing Revisited - I'm Sorry!

Hello Everyone, We are looking to transition our 23 channels from testing/lab into production. During testing we used the free open source g729 license using the instructions found here: http://blog.manhag.org/2010/05/installing-the-free-g729-codec-for-asterisk/ A little more about our setup.

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Licensing Revisited - I'm Sorry!

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Jayson Devor jayson.de...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Everyone, We are looking to transition our 23 channels from testing/lab into production. During testing we used the free open source g729 license using the instructions found here:

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Licensing Revisited - I'm Sorry!

On Feb 27, 2014 10:02 PM, Paul Belanger paul.belan...@polybeacon.com wrote: No such thing as 'free open source g729 license', if you actually read the site: There is regarding the copyright on the code. The fact it is also patent encumbered is a different issue. DISCLAIMER: You might have

[asterisk-users] G729 - what happens if licences used up?

I haven't been able to find the answer online, and am not currently able to conduct an experiment to find the answer... I understand that in a SIP call where G729 has been negotiated as the preferred codec, a G.729 licence is not consumed until there is a need to perform transcoding, e.g. play a

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 - what happens if licences used up?

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Tony Mountifield t...@softins.co.uk wrote: I haven't been able to find the answer online, and am not currently able to conduct an experiment to find the answer... I understand that in a SIP call where G729 has been negotiated as the preferred codec, a G.729

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 - what happens if licences used up?

: Thursday, February 20, 2014 10:40 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] G729 - what happens if licences used up? I haven't been able to find the answer online, and am not currently able to conduct an experiment to find the answer... I understand that in a SIP call where

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 - what happens if licences used up?

In article CALLKq0RpimD05jz=osbgjydx-41uebohxmft_skwfjt51ko...@mail.gmail.com, Paul Belanger paul.belan...@polybeacon.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Tony Mountifield t...@softins.co.uk wrote: I haven't been able to find the answer online, and am not currently able to conduct an

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 - what happens if licences used up?

On 20/02/14 17:16, Paul Belanger wrote: On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Tony Mountifieldt...@softins.co.uk wrote: I haven't been able to find the answer online, and am not currently able to conduct an experiment to find the answer... I understand that in a SIP call where G729 has been

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 CPU Utilization

hello: it really depends on number of calls transcded. it the number is less 20 calls, the CPU should be ok. but it is very sure that software based take take much more than hardware based transcoder. ? 2013-9-9 15:53, Gopalakrishnan N ??: Hi, How much CPU utilization will it take when I use

[asterisk-users] G729 CPU Utilization

Hi, How much CPU utilization will it take when I use G729 transcoding via hardware based transcoder. Regards -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Passthrough How To

You ok sir? Are you going to make it? N. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Passthrough How To

[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Nick Khamis Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 10:20 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Passthrough How To Anyone? :) N. On 8/13/13, Nick Khamis sym...@gmail.com wrote: Hello

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Passthrough How To

[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Nick Khamis Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 10:20 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Passthrough How To Anyone? :) N. On 8/13/13, Nick Khamis sym...@gmail.com wrote: Hello

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Passthrough How To

Anyone? :) N. On 8/13/13, Nick Khamis sym...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Everyone, We are currently experiencing some higher load on our servers, and since signaling comes into our servers on G729, we would like to implement G729 pass-through. A few questions arise, do we need to convert all

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Passthrough How To

, August 14, 2013 10:20 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Passthrough How To Anyone? :) N. On 8/13/13, Nick Khamis sym...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Everyone, We are currently experiencing some higher load on our servers, and since

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Passthrough How To

Hey!!! Eric thank you so much for your response. Could you guys please direct us in achieving as much as possible. For example: * What linux command can we use to convert all recording to G729 * Which files do we need to convert and there locations * For *testing* how do we make sure Asterisk

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Passthrough How To

I forgot to mention that all our equipment (phones etc..) are using G729, and this is for internal use over the net. The problem, concurrent calls, and bad bandwidth at some locations... N. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Passthrough How To

As my understanding Asterisk always pass-thu g729 if both ends have this codec. But if you answer the call or play some audio before dialing to end point then asterisk stay between both legs. In case of VM. you should install g729 if your prompts are in g729 format. As a2billing play voice prompts

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Passthrough How To

Hello Ashgar, Thank you so much for your response. As removing A2B is not an option we would first like to begin by converting all audio files (Asterisk, VM, A2B prompts etc...) to G729 to minimize unneeded trascoding. Linux commands and the list of recording would be a great help. Sorry, not new

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Passthrough How To

to the caller. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Nick Khamis Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 10:45 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] G729

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Passthrough How To

Hey Eric, I do have the codec installed, and I remember hearing about the CLI command to convert. Is there a recent how-to of blog already discussing this somewhere? N. On 8/14/13, Nick Khamis sym...@gmail.com wrote: I wanted to mention that I do not mind posting the converted files on this

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Passthrough How To

: Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Passthrough How To Hey Eric, I do have the codec installed, and I remember hearing about the CLI command to convert. Is there a recent how-to of blog already discussing this somewhere? N. On 8/14/13, Nick Khamis sym...@gmail.com wrote: I wanted to mention that I do

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Passthrough How To

I wanted to mention that I do not mind posting the converted files on this list for future individuals, given that I am not doing anything illegal... N. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Passthrough How To

-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Nick Khamis Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 11:16 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Passthrough How To Hey Eric, I do have the codec

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Passthrough How To

...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Nick Khamis Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 11:25 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Passthrough How To Not really no... And how do I make sure Asterisk always

[asterisk-users] G729 Passthrough How To

Hello Everyone, We are currently experiencing some higher load on our servers, and since signaling comes into our servers on G729, we would like to implement G729 pass-through. A few questions arise, do we need to convert all the recording to the codec, and what about voicemail? We are also

[asterisk-users] g729 codec over SIP Trunk between CCM and Asterisk

Hello, My problem is, outgoing calls (from asterisk to CCM) work fine but incoming (from CCM to Asterisk) does not work because of CCM is trying to use g729 over SIP trunk. I have found that link after a quick search. Problem is the same as in link below (However my Asterisk version is 1.8.13)

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec over SIP Trunk between CCM and Asterisk

2013/1/17 Onur Cem Çelebi occel...@gmail.com Hello, My problem is, outgoing calls (from asterisk to CCM) work fine but incoming (from CCM to Asterisk) does not work because of CCM is trying to use g729 over SIP trunk. I have found that link after a quick search. Problem is the same as in

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec over SIP Trunk between CCM and Asterisk

Thanks for reply Leandro. We have installed g279 codec in Asterisk box.Even if not so, there is no problem outgoing (from Asterisk to CCM) calls. But after i searched the issue, i figured out that CCM 4.x does not let g729 codec to pass through over SIP trunk. This is limited only in CCM. If we

[asterisk-users] G729 and voice mail

I am trying to figure out the best way to deal with this. I want all of the calls in the network to be G729 and this is working. I do have hardware that provides me 30 g729 licenses. I am setting each extensions to disallow=all and allow=g729. However when I have this setup, I get no voice mail

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 and voice mail

, 2012 2:32 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] G729 and voice mail I am trying to figure out the best way to deal with this. I want all of the calls in the network to be G729 and this is working. I do have hardware that provides me 30 g729 licenses

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 and voice mail

Subject: [asterisk-users] G729 and voice mail I am trying to figure out the best way to deal with this. I want all of the calls in the network to be G729 and this is working. I do have hardware that provides me 30 g729 licenses. I am setting each extensions to disallow=all and allow=g729. However

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 and voice mail

-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] G729 and voice mail I am trying to figure out the best way to deal with this. I want all of the calls in the network to be G729 and this is working. I do have hardware that provides me 30 g729 licenses. I am setting each

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 freezes 1.8

I've just submitted a case in the official support web interface. Thank you to all, Samuel. On 18 April 2012 14:52, Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com wrote: On 04/18/2012 06:13 AM, A J Stiles wrote: On Wednesday 18 April 2012, samuel wrote: On 18 April 2012 10:33, A J

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 freezes 1.8

Just in case it helps: It turned out that from asterisk version 1.8.4 on, the g729 binaries are different from the previous versions so it was a version mismatch between the g729 (1.8.0_3.1.5) and asterisk (1.8.8 and higher). Thanks to the Digium support department that found out the issue.

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 freezes 1.8

On 04/19/2012 10:57 AM, samuel wrote: Just in case it helps: It turned out that from asterisk version 1.8.4 on, the g729 binaries are different from the previous versions so it was a version mismatch between the g729 (1.8.0_3.1.5) and asterisk (1.8.8 and higher). Ahh, and that is 'documented'

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 freezes 1.8

On Thursday 19 April 2012, samuel wrote: Just in case it helps: It turned out that from asterisk version 1.8.4 on, the g729 binaries are different from the previous versions so it was a version mismatch between the g729 (1.8.0_3.1.5) and asterisk (1.8.8 and higher). Thanks to the Digium

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 freezes 1.8

On 04/19/2012 11:52 AM, A J Stiles wrote: On Thursday 19 April 2012, samuel wrote: Just in case it helps: It turned out that from asterisk version 1.8.4 on, the g729 binaries are different from the previous versions so it was a version mismatch between the g729 (1.8.0_3.1.5) and asterisk

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 freezes 1.8

AJ- On Thursday 19 April 2012, samuel wrote: Just in case it helps: It turned out that from asterisk version 1.8.4 on, the g729 binaries are different from the previous versions so it was a version mismatch between the g729 (1.8.0_3.1.5) and asterisk (1.8.8 and higher). Thanks to the

[asterisk-users] g729 freezes 1.8

Hi folks, I was recently installing g729 support as usual (register, cp codec_g729 to modules) and found out that the resulting asterisk instances freezes whenever g729 commands are executed in the command line. The registration process went OK and I can see the module being loaded by asterisk:

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 freezes 1.8

On Wednesday 18 April 2012, samuel wrote: Hi folks, I was recently installing g729 support as usual (register, cp codec_g729 to modules) and found out that the resulting asterisk instances freezes whenever g729 commands are executed in the command line. . stuff deleted . Are you

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 freezes 1.8

I'm pretty sure it's not a problem of 32-64 bits: Asterisk 1.8.11.0 built by root on a x86_64 running Linux on 2012-04-18 07:45:43 UTC and I downladed the binaries from http://downloads.digium.com/pub/telephony/codec_g729/asterisk-1.8.0/x86-64/ And asterisk loads the module, as you can see in

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 freezes 1.8

Just to confirm, I try to load a 32 bits g729 binary and asterisk doesn't load it and complain about it: [Apr 18 12:38:50] WARNING[2033] loader.c: Error loading module 'codec_g729a.so': /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/codec_g729a.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32 [Apr 18 12:38:50] WARNING[2033]

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 freezes 1.8

On Wednesday 18 April 2012, samuel wrote: On 18 April 2012 10:33, A J Stiles asterisk_l...@earthshod.co.uk wrote: Are you sure your g729 module, your Asterisk and your kernel are of the same bittedness? I'm pretty sure it's not a problem of 32-64 bits: Asterisk 1.8.11.0 built by root

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 freezes 1.8

On 04/18/2012 06:13 AM, A J Stiles wrote: On Wednesday 18 April 2012, samuel wrote: On 18 April 2012 10:33, A J Stilesasterisk_l...@earthshod.co.uk wrote: Are you sure your g729 module, your Asterisk and your kernel are of the same bittedness? I'm pretty sure it's not a problem of 32-64

[asterisk-users] G729 and Dahdi: Inbound forcing ulaw!

Happy day to ya list! I've recently deployed an update on our Asterisk server, taking it from 1.2 up to 1.8.5 - going from zaptel to dahdi. Excitement levels are high and performance so far is wonderful. The issue I have is I've purchased several G729 licenses, registered them, installed the

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 and Dahdi: Inbound forcing ulaw!

] On Behalf Of JT Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 3:45 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] G729 and Dahdi: Inbound forcing ulaw! Happy day to ya list! I've recently deployed an update on our Asterisk server, taking it from 1.2 up to 1.8.5 - going from zaptel to dahdi

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 and Dahdi: Inbound forcing ulaw!

19, 2011 3:45 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] G729 and Dahdi: Inbound forcing ulaw! Happy day to ya list! I've recently deployed an update on our Asterisk server, taking it from 1.2 up to 1.8.5 - going from zaptel to dahdi. Excitement levels are high

[asterisk-users] g729 codec loading

Hello Everyone, I've successfully registered my g729a licenses. When i try to load the module from asterisk Cli i got the following error *Error loading module 'codec_g729a.so': /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/codec_g729a.so: cannot restore segment prot after reloc:

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec loading

Try disabling SELinux if you have it enabled (unless of course you need it). I seem to remember there is certain compilation flags required (position independent code, -fPIC?) to run with SELinux enabled, may be the codec_g729a.so is not compiled properly to run under such circumstances? Moises

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 codec loading

Thank you Moises it works perfectly. On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Moises Silva moises.si...@gmail.comwrote: Try disabling SELinux if you have it enabled (unless of course you need it). I seem to remember there is certain compilation flags required (position independent code, -fPIC?)

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 license key registration

2010/6/25 Remco Bressers rbress...@signet.nl: On 06/25/2010 09:48 AM, Kiss András wrote: You selected 5, G.729 Codec Please enter your Key-ID: G729-10D2X----X This product key cannot be registered!  Please verify you entered the correct product key. Server

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 license key registration

On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, Kiss András wrote: 2010/6/25 Remco Bressers rbress...@signet.nl: On 06/25/2010 09:48 AM, Kiss András wrote: You selected 5, G.729 Codec Please enter your Key-ID: G729-10D2X----X This product key cannot be registered!  Please verify you entered

[asterisk-users] G729 license key registration

Hi, I have trouble re-registering a G729 license for Asterisk (bought 6 years ago) My license looks like: 10D2X----X Tried to re-register the codec according to the http://downloads.digium.com/pub/telephony/codec_g729/README document, but the register failed with this

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 license key registration

On 06/25/2010 09:48 AM, Kiss András wrote: You selected 5, G.729 Codec Please enter your Key-ID: G729-10D2X----X This product key cannot be registered! Please verify you entered the correct product key. Server response: 404 - Key not found. Any suggestions?

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 exhaustion conditions

G729 is free for use is no transcoding is done. 2010/4/19 Harel Cohen ha...@easycall.gi: Hi all, Suppose I buy and install one G729 codec. Suppose there is one call going on where both end-points have G729 codecs and the Asterisk is not doing any transcoding. Does this conversation exhaust

[asterisk-users] G729 exhaustion conditions

Hi all, Suppose I buy and install one G729 codec. Suppose there is one call going on where both end-points have G729 codecs and the Asterisk is not doing any transcoding. Does this conversation exhaust my G729 license (even though this call would have worked without license in the first place)

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Pass through

The SDP response is the IP of the Trixbox server. On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Christian Victor christ...@victormedia.dewrote: Hi! Are you sure you are getting Astrisk out of the media path? I guess reinvite must be allowed. Then it should work without transcoding licenses. Maybe you

[asterisk-users] G729 Pass through

Hi; I am running Asterisk (Trix) 1.2.17 with Aastra 6731i phones as my endpoints. It seems that when I enable G729 on my peers in sip.conf and make a call I am getting the following errors: Called crp_uk/806575011971553141421 Dec 11 07:57:10 WARNING[31903] channel.c: Unable to find a

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Pass through

attachments. From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Dovey Forman Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 12:06 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] G729 Pass through Importance: High

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Pass through

*Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Pass through Have you paied for and imported g729 licenses from digium so that asterisks can use g729? http://store.digium.com/productview.php?category_id=5product_code=8G729CODEC James Shigley *Monroe** Telephone Answering Service* 409-981-9213

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 Pass through

Hi! Are you sure you are getting Astrisk out of the media path? I guess reinvite must be allowed. Then it should work without transcoding licenses. Maybe you should take a look at the SIP DEBUG info to see what codec Asterisk is trying to negotiate with the trunk. You could disallow alaw and

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 with IAX

Of course, as long as your endpoints support it. Read more about it and purchase G.729 channel licenses for Asterisk from Digium: http://www.digium.com/en/products/g729codec.php Once you have the codec properly installed, enable it for your peer in your iax.conf file allow=g729. Restart

[asterisk-users] G729 with IAX

dear All, can I use G729 with IAX trunk or IAX calls regards Dhaval ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

[asterisk-users] G729: TC400B vs Software Encoder

Can someone help me decide between TC400B vs Software Encoder. TC400B is really expensive and would like to get opinion if it is worth considering. Maximum simultaneous call we handle is hardly 10-15. Will going to TC400B improves quality. Any other option then TC400B. Thanks Jim

Re: [asterisk-users] G729: TC400B vs Software Encoder

Thanks. What do you suggest for system with 15 max simultaneous calls? On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com wrote: Jim Boykin wrote: Can someone help me decide between TC400B vs Software Encoder. TC400B is really expensive and would like to get opinion if it

Re: [asterisk-users] G729: TC400B vs Software Encoder

Jim Boykin wrote: Can someone help me decide between TC400B vs Software Encoder. TC400B is really expensive and would like to get opinion if it is worth considering. Maximum simultaneous call we handle is hardly 10-15. Will going to TC400B improves quality. Any other option then TC400B. All

Re: [asterisk-users] G729: TC400B vs Software Encoder

On 12/05/2009 10:19 PM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: Jim Boykin wrote: Can someone help me decide between TC400B vs Software Encoder. TC400B is really expensive and would like to get opinion if it is worth considering. Maximum simultaneous call we handle is hardly 10-15. Will going to TC400B

Re: [asterisk-users] G729: TC400B vs Software Encoder

On Saturday 05 December 2009 08:25:53 Jim Boykin wrote: Thanks. What do you suggest for system with 15 max simultaneous calls? As long as your machine is at least a single CPU, 2GHz or better, you should be fine with the software encoder. The TC400 is really only necessary on systems where the

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 in asterisk upgrade issue

Hi, Finally I made the upgrade. Everything work well, but I have an issue with one of the G729 licenses, I can't load it. I have two other license files that load with no problems. The host id is the same in all the files, can you give me an idea how to check this problem? Kevin P.

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 in asterisk upgrade issue

Luis Silva wrote: Finally I made the upgrade. Everything work well, but I have an issue with one of the G729 licenses, I can’t load it… I have two other license files that load with no problems. The host id is the same in all the files, can you give me an idea how to check this problem?

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 in asterisk upgrade issue

Kevin P. Fleming wrote: Luis Silva wrote: I have an asterisk in 1.2 version with 30 g729 licenses. I what to upgrade it to 1.4 and also upgrade the O.S. from fedora 8 to centos 5.3. For what I understand I can make the backup of the license files in /var/lib/asterisk/licenses/

[asterisk-users] G729 in asterisk upgrade issue

Hi, I need some help. I have an asterisk in 1.2 version with 30 g729 licenses. I what to upgrade it to 1.4 and also upgrade the O.S. from fedora 8 to centos 5.3. For what I understand I can make the backup of the license files in /var/lib/asterisk/licenses/ if I need to reinstall the

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 in asterisk upgrade issue

, 2009 12:36 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] G729 in asterisk upgrade issue Hi, I need some help. I have an asterisk in 1.2 version with 30 g729 licenses. I what to upgrade it to 1.4 and also upgrade the O.S. from fedora 8 to centos 5.3. For what I understand I

Re: [asterisk-users] G729 in asterisk upgrade issue

Luis Silva wrote: I have an asterisk in 1.2 version with 30 g729 licenses. I what to upgrade it to 1.4 and also upgrade the O.S. from fedora 8 to centos 5.3. For what I understand I can make the backup of the license files in /var/lib/asterisk/licenses/ if I need to reinstall the

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 free codec any idea

[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Matt Riddell Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 10:47 PM To: Asterisk Users List Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] g729 free codec any idea On 9/10/09 3:31 PM, Michelle Dupuis wrote: I believe that Intel placed a 729 codec into the public

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 free codec any idea

On Fri, 9 Oct 2009, Michelle Dupuis wrote: Before we call each other liars and thieves, here is a link: http://www.readytechnology.co.uk/open/ipp-codecs-g729-g723.1/ As with any open source, do your own homework on licensing, AND apply your own reasonable judgment. At this point I would

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 free codec any idea

- DHAVAL INDRODIYA dhaval.it01...@gmail.com wrote: STUFF any help appreciated There is no *FREE* G.729 codec... Go to Digium.com and purchase the licensed G.729 codec. Yes, it's $10 per channel but as a nice side effect, you'll also get a supported, working G.729 implementation where

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 free codec any idea

Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] g729 free codec any idea - DHAVAL INDRODIYA dhaval.it01...@gmail.com wrote: STUFF any help appreciated There is no *FREE* G.729 codec... Go to Digium.com and purchase the licensed G.729 codec. Yes, it's $10 per channel but as a nice side effect

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 free codec any idea

...@lists.digium.com [mailto: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Tim Nelson *Sent:* Thursday, October 08, 2009 12:19 PM *To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] g729 free codec any idea - DHAVAL INDRODIYA

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 free codec any idea

On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 1:33 PM, DHAVAL INDRODIYA dhaval.it01...@gmail.comwrote: there is free implementation of g729 codec you can get it from http://asterisk.hosting.lv I'm not an expert on patents, but even when you have access to the g729 implementation, the algorithm is patented, so, as

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 free codec any idea

Message - From: DHAVAL INDRODIYA To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 19:33 Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] g729 free codec any idea there is free implementation of g729 codec you can get it from http://asterisk.hosting.lv

Re: [asterisk-users] g729 free codec any idea

: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Dovid Bender Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 8:37 PM To: Asterisk Users List Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] g729 free codec any idea Just because something is available doesn't mean

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >