Re: [asterisk-users] ISDN30 and TDM400P + FAXing ...

2007-01-22 Thread Gordon Henderson
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Robbie Hughes wrote: So it sounds like it should just work. I'll let you know in a few weeks time :) TDM400P to E1/T1 card faxing fails by design. The lack of synchronisation between cards means it can *never* work with any reliability. The hardware will not permit it.

Re: [asterisk-users] ISDN30 and TDM400P + FAXing ...

2007-01-21 Thread Gordon Henderson
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007, Andrew Joakimsen wrote: Assuming your PRI supports timing from the remote end (CO) which I highly suspect is the case, then you should set the asterisk machine to be a slave to the CO timing and then set any other interfaces you have to NOT be masters, so that the CO

Re: [asterisk-users] ISDN30 and TDM400P + FAXing ...

2007-01-21 Thread Steve Underwood
Hi, Gordon Henderson wrote: On Sat, 20 Jan 2007, Andrew Joakimsen wrote: Assuming your PRI supports timing from the remote end (CO) which I highly suspect is the case, then you should set the asterisk machine to be a slave to the CO timing and then set any other interfaces you have to NOT be

Re: [asterisk-users] ISDN30 and TDM400P + FAXing ...

2007-01-21 Thread Robbie Hughes
So it sounds like it should just work. I'll let you know in a few weeks time :) TDM400P to E1/T1 card faxing fails by design. The lack of synchronisation between cards means it can *never* work with any reliability. The hardware will not permit it. (And I know I've asked this before, but

[asterisk-users] ISDN30 and TDM400P + FAXing ...

2007-01-20 Thread Gordon Henderson
I have a system I'll be installing soon which has an ISDN30 (E1, UK) feed and they want to hook up a fax machine and use existing analogue conference phones (expensive polycom units) This is something I've seen and used on legacy PBXs and would seem to be a fairly standard offering, but an

Re: [asterisk-users] ISDN30 and TDM400P + FAXing ...

2007-01-20 Thread Andrew Joakimsen
Assuming your PRI supports timing from the remote end (CO) which I highly suspect is the case, then you should set the asterisk machine to be a slave to the CO timing and then set any other interfaces you have to NOT be masters, so that the CO timing is always used. Assuming you do this and