At 5:46 PM +0200 2008/10/16, Olivier wrote:
Is Incomplete() application an acceptable work around for ISN ?
It is impossible to determine the full sequence of digits for an ISN
number ahead of time (well, I shouldn't say impossible because one
could create a really nasty hack...) because the
2008/10/17 John Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 5:46 PM +0200 2008/10/16, Olivier wrote:
Is Incomplete() application an acceptable work around for ISN ?
It is impossible to determine the full sequence of digits for an ISN
number ahead of time (well, I shouldn't say impossible because one
On Friday 17 October 2008 10:15:22 Olivier wrote:
2008/10/17 John Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 5:46 PM +0200 2008/10/16, Olivier wrote:
Is Incomplete() application an acceptable work around for ISN ?
It is impossible to determine the full sequence of digits for an ISN
number ahead of time
Is Incomplete() application an acceptable work around for ISN ?
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
On Thursday 16 October 2008 10:46:51 Olivier wrote:
Is Incomplete() application an acceptable work around for ISN ?
If you could explain what ISN is, that might help.
--
Tilghman
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:47:15 -0500, Tilghman Lesher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If you could explain what ISN is, that might help.
an ISN, stands for ITAD Subscriber Number, which in turn stands for
'Internet Telephony Administrative Domain Subscriber Number'.
Essentially it is a very clever way
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 13:59 -0500, Karl Fife wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:47:15 -0500, Tilghman Lesher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If you could explain what ISN is, that might help.
an ISN, stands for ITAD Subscriber Number, which in turn stands for
'Internet Telephony Administrative
On Thursday 16 October 2008 13:59:46 Karl Fife wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:47:15 -0500, Tilghman Lesher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If you could explain what ISN is, that might help.
an ISN, stands for ITAD Subscriber Number, which in turn stands for
'Internet Telephony Administrative Domain
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 19:59 -0500, Karl Fife wrote:
QUESTION: Is there a way to do just that? As in: match:
one more of the preceding character or expression (a variation on '.')
zero more of the preceding character or expression (a variation on bang)
No, there's currently nothing in the
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 09:06 -0400, Jared Smith wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 19:59 -0500, Karl Fife wrote:
QUESTION: Is there a way to do just that? As in: match:
one more of the preceding character or expression (a variation on '.')
zero more of the preceding character or expression (a
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:22:09 -0600, Steve Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
the real killer is trailing context... for instance...
XX[58]*ZZ
If you give it the pattern 3358, it has to decide that
the [58]* part is empty and the 58 is matched by ZZ.
And this makes the whole algorithm pretty
Steve Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Other than the above, we could invent a slightly different syntax for
pcre type expressions; and you'd have to invent some sort of
disambiguation
for when multiple extensions might be matched, to choose the 'best' one.
I'd just use strict ordering from
I have to eat crow here guys. I was completely wrong about the use of
dialplan wildcards and non numerics such as *,# and +.
My test was invalid and I drew the wrong conclusion. So to summarize:
A single dialplan extension that matches
'3129842314' or
'*989' or
'+13129842314'
BUT NOT
'i' nor
Karl Fife [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
is in fact simply something like:
exten = _[0-9*#+]X.,1,NoOp(*** match ***)
As long as you're happy to match *9foo and not match **123, then yes,
that will work.
/Benny
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:54:40 +0200, Benny Amorsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Karl Fife [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
is in fact simply something like:
exten = _[0-9*#+]X.,1,NoOp(*** match ***)
As long as you're happy to match *9foo and not match **123, then yes,
that will work.
Thanks
On Sat, 2008-10-11 at 10:09 +0200, Benny Amorsen wrote:
Tilghman Lesher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
exten = [0-9*#+].,...
If that does not work, that is a bug and needs to be reported as such.
Sadly that matches *james and 9foo...
It would be nice if you could use normal regexes (e.g.
Steve Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
People have voiced this before; but the cut-down version of RE's that
the matching algorithms allow are fairly fast, both in the new and
the old pattern matching algorithms.
Steve
Your explanation is clear and it seems like a good design choice to
exten = +13129842314,1,Noop(Happy match!)
or
exten = _+1NXXNXX,1,Noop(Happier match!)
Karl Fife wrote:
Steve Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
People have voiced this before; but the cut-down version of RE's that
the matching algorithms allow are fairly fast, both in the new and
the old
Tilghman Lesher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
exten = [0-9*#+].,...
If that does not work, that is a bug and needs to be reported as such.
Sadly that matches *james and 9foo...
It would be nice if you could use normal regexes (e.g. with the pcre
library) in extensions.conf.
/Benny
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
Can someone suggest the best way to deal with this without resoring to a
highly repetitive/iterative dialplan?
Leif and I discussed something like this at Astricon 2008, and we came up with
this patch:
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13632
Nice! For those of
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 21:58:31 Karl Fife wrote:
So that leaves only one question:
exten = ?
What extension the following:
'3129842314'
'*989'
'+13129842314'
BUT does not match:
'i'
'james'
is this possible?
I think you already described it in your original post:
exten =
On Wednesday 08 October 2008 02:20:38 Rob Hillis wrote:
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
Can someone suggest the best way to deal with this without resoring to a
highly repetitive/iterative dialplan?
Leif and I discussed something like this at Astricon 2008, and we came up
with this patch:
On Monday 06 October 2008 14:58:09 Karl Fife wrote:
In several places online, and in the Asterisk F.O.T. book, there is a
warning against using '_.' saying:
[it] should probably never be used.
However, the need often arises act on numeric extensions that begin with
*'s and #'s, and '+', and
Leif and I discussed something like this at Astricon 2008, and we came up
with
this patch:
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13632
--
Tilghman
That's a great idea. Good work.
Also, nice work with the new CDR stuff in 1.6!
So that leaves only one question:
exten = ?
What
In several places online, and in the Asterisk F.O.T. book, there is a
warning against using '_.' saying:
[it] should probably never be used.
However, the need often arises act on numeric extensions that begin with
*'s and #'s, and '+', and of course _X. does not match
I have tried exten =
25 matches
Mail list logo
