Re: [asterisk-users] PRI span configuration - span remains down

2007-10-29 Thread David Kennedy
Just a little follow up here... Missed a call from someone at Telewest on friday, so I don't know what they were going to tell me. However I've come in this morning and thought well, you never know, perhaps he was phoning to say we've fixed it. Tried calling my mobile and now it works. No idea

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI span configuration - span remains down

2007-10-26 Thread Alejandro Kauffmann
David Kennedy wrote: Hi While I have fixed the problem from this post, I do have another problem, and you have asked for a debug output here, so I'll go against my better instinct and reply here :) -- Making new call for cr 32774 -- Requested transfer capability: 0x00 - SPEECH [

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI span configuration - span remains down

2007-10-26 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 01:53:18AM -0500, Alejandro Kauffmann wrote: 1. I missed something. (modprobe zaptel, modprobe (card driver), or ztcfg) All the above commands may change the current configuration. Try: cat /proc/zaptel/* On very recent Zaptel: zaptel_hardware lszaptel --

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI span configuration - span remains down

2007-10-26 Thread David Kennedy
I think the group numbers was just a mismatch inbetween my fiddling to try and make it work. The reason the channel is 6 is because once a channel is tried, it seems to got locked somehow. Channels end up stuck in a Resetting state. I tried altering some settings - not using CRC4 etc - and

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI span configuration - span remains down

2007-10-26 Thread Matthew Fredrickson
David Kennedy wrote: Is there some part of the debug output I need to tell the telco about? When I was on to them earlier today, the engineer only seemed to know how to turn bits of their network on and off, not much about settings I need my end etc. Just tell them when you try to make a

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI span configuration - span remains down

2007-10-26 Thread Matthew Fredrickson
David Kennedy wrote: I think the group numbers was just a mismatch inbetween my fiddling to try and make it work. The reason the channel is 6 is because once a channel is tried, it seems to got locked somehow. Channels end up stuck in a Resetting state. I tried altering some settings -

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI span configuration - span remains down

2007-10-26 Thread Matthew Fredrickson
Rony Ron wrote: Hi, in meantime if you have another type of digium pri card you can plug it into your box to confirm that it's not related to that card! Better eliminate any doubt about that card... it made me suffer ! Well, if signalling didn't work on the D-channel, that might be a more

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI span configuration - span remains down

2007-10-26 Thread James FitzGibbon
On 10/26/07, Matthew Fredrickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there some part of the debug output I need to tell the telco about? When I was on to them earlier today, the engineer only seemed to know how to turn bits of their network on and off, not much about settings I need my end etc.

[asterisk-users] PRI span configuration - span remains down

2007-10-25 Thread David Kennedy
Hi, I'm trying to connect to Telewest/Virgin Media with a TE110P using asterisk 1.4.13/zaptel 1.4.6. No matter what I try, my span always appears as PRI span 1/0: Provisioned, Down, Active My zapata.conf is currently --- [channels] echocancel=yes

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI span configuration - span remains down

2007-10-25 Thread Rony Ron
Hello, Quoting Digium Support: The TE110P has been discontinued and replaced in our product lineup with the TE120P, which features many overall improvements and does not suffer from the HDLC Abort/Bad FCS problems that the TE110P did. Better switch to TE120P, On 10/25/07, David Kennedy [EMAIL

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI span configuration - span remains down

2007-10-25 Thread David Kennedy
Hi, thanks for the quick reply I've literally just got off the phone with a Telewest engineer - after being told the line was ok yesterday, I've been told it wasn't actually turned on. D'oh! If need be I do have a spare TE120P in a box in my desk drawer, so I can send that to Manchester to be

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI span configuration - span remains down

2007-10-25 Thread Matthew Fredrickson
Rony Ron wrote: Hello, Quoting Digium Support: The TE110P has been discontinued and replaced in our product lineup with the TE120P, which features many overall improvements and does not suffer from the HDLC Abort/Bad FCS problems that the TE110P did. Although this is true ( :-) ) I think

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI span configuration - span remains down

2007-10-25 Thread David Kennedy
Hi While I have fixed the problem from this post, I do have another problem, and you have asked for a debug output here, so I'll go against my better instinct and reply here :) -- Making new call for cr 32774 -- Requested transfer capability: 0x00 - SPEECH [ 00 01 0e 06 08 02 00 06 05 04

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI span configuration - span remains down

2007-10-25 Thread Matthew Fredrickson
David Kennedy wrote: Hi While I have fixed the problem from this post, I do have another problem, and you have asked for a debug output here, so I'll go against my better instinct and reply here :) I just looked through your debug and can't see any obvious problems. It's likely you'll need

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI span configuration - span remains down

2007-10-25 Thread David Kennedy
Is there some part of the debug output I need to tell the telco about? When I was on to them earlier today, the engineer only seemed to know how to turn bits of their network on and off, not much about settings I need my end etc. Dave On 10/25/07, Matthew Fredrickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI span configuration - span remains down

2007-10-25 Thread Rony Ron
Hi, in meantime if you have another type of digium pri card you can plug it into your box to confirm that it's not related to that card! Better eliminate any doubt about that card... it made me suffer ! BR, On 10/25/07, Matthew Fredrickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Kennedy wrote: Hi