[asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk Development and Release Cycle

2006-08-31 Thread Tomislav Parčina
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... Err, wasn't the patch for H.264 just changing one digit for another? Hi Thomas, I don't know. I should check BUG page for that. -- Tomislav Parčina Lama Computers Split Stinice 12, 21000 Split Tel.: +385(21)495148 Mob.: +385(91)1212148

[asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk Development and Release Cycle

2006-08-31 Thread Tomislav Parčina
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... Other cool things: make menuconfig Jingle/jabber support IAX2 media transfers new sound files New answer machine detection (AMD) and much much more! Hi Matt, thank you for info! Bye. -- Tomislav Parčina Lama Computers Split

[asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk Development and Release Cycle

2006-08-30 Thread Tomislav Parčina
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... Of course we care. Turns out that schedule was unrealistic, and when we start the next cycle we will regroup and decide if we either stretch out the cycle or reduce the amount of new functionality that gets added during the cycle. OK,

[asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk Development and Release Cycle

2006-08-30 Thread Tomislav Parčina
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... I don't know. Do you use Asterisk? That makes you part of the team. Have you tested the trunk version? Provided assistance testing out patches waiting for completion? Really, once all the new features have been completed, it will

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk Development and Release Cycle

2006-08-30 Thread Matt Riddell (IT)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tomislav Parčina wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... I don't know. Do you use Asterisk? That makes you part of the team. Have you tested the trunk version? Provided assistance testing out patches waiting for

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk Development and Release Cycle

2006-08-30 Thread Thomas Kenyon
Tomislav Parčina wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... I don't know. Do you use Asterisk? That makes you part of the team. Have you tested the trunk version? Provided assistance testing out patches waiting for completion? Really, once all the new features

[Asterisk-Users] Re: Asterisk Development and Release Cycle

2006-01-23 Thread Steven
OK, so if I were using SVN, the stable branch would still be changing and my problem was that I was using the Tarballs? Correct? -- -- Steven May you have the peace and freedom that come from abandoning all hope of having a better past. ---- --- - - - -- - - --

[Asterisk-Users] Re: Asterisk Development and Release Cycle

2006-01-23 Thread Tony Mountifield
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, so if I were using SVN, the stable branch would still be changing and my problem was that I was using the Tarballs? Correct? I guess so. The stable branch (now branches/1.2) has bug fixes applied to it as they get done. Every

[Asterisk-Users] Re: Asterisk Development and Release Cycle

2006-01-21 Thread Tony Mountifield
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is great news. Agreed! Previously, stable was just considered a snapshot and if you ran stable and encountered a bug, you had to switch to head to get the fix. I don't think this is correct. Pure bug fixes were always

[Asterisk-Users] Re: Asterisk Development and Release Cycle

2006-01-20 Thread Steven
This is great news. Previously, stable was just considered a snapshot and if you ran stable and encountered a bug, you had to switch to head to get the fix. This, of course, left you open to more possible bugs. I think this change will make Asterisk more trustable for production use. I