Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Can you explain why multiple registrationisan important (missing) feature ?

2006-09-22 Thread Craig Guy
] Re: Can you explain why multiple registrationisan important (missing) feature ? On 9/20/06, Craig Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [9580] type=peer auth=000413242fff:[EMAIL PROTECTED] It would be [MAC ADDRESS] type=peer ...etc.. Or at least, that's how I interpreted what Eric said. I think

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Can you explain why multiple registrationisan important (missing) feature ?

2006-09-22 Thread Eric \ManxPower\ Wieling
Craig Guy wrote: I was afraid that may be the case - The issue I have with that approach is how do you avoid manually mapping extensions to mac addresses in the dialplan? Assuming I have a PRI with 100did and I want to use the last 4 digits of the DID as the internal extension, I want to use