In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
Well, it would seem to me that with a little attention to processor
affinity, you could run your Asterisk and DBMS code on one processor,
and let the other one handle the device interrupts; ie: that sounds to
me like a feature, rather
For what we do with Asterisk(lots of meetme and Zap - IAX2) It does
spread the load across both cores. In our initial comparisons for
equal call traffic, the P4-D had half or the average loadavg for a 6
hour time period of the P4 of the same speed.
MATT---
Hi Matt!
Thank you for
Tomislav Parčina ha scritto:
For what we do with Asterisk(lots of meetme and Zap - IAX2) It
does spread the load across both cores. In our initial
comparisons for equal call traffic, the P4-D had half or the
average loadavg for a 6 hour time period of the P4 of the same
speed.
MATT---
Hi
For the Asterisk installation, no. For Linux, yes. I built a custom
SMP kernel, which depending on your Linux distribution may or may not
be necessary for you.
MATT---
On 9/26/06, Tomislav Parčina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For what we do with Asterisk(lots of meetme and Zap - IAX2) It does
Here's what we set in menuconfig when building Linux kernels for
multi-processor systems:
Processor Type and Features ---
-Symmetric multi-processing support
-Timer frequency (1000 HZ)
Device Drivers ---
Character devices ---
* Enhanced Real Time Clock Support
Real
Matt Florell wrote:
For the Asterisk installation, no. For Linux, yes. I built a custom
SMP kernel, which depending on your Linux distribution may or may not
be necessary for you.
what specific things have you done, that isn't in the base kernel ?
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
I have a few dual core that I have installed Asterisk on without any issues.
Hi Bill!
Sure you don't have any issues, but do you take any advantage of dual core
processor? Why would I pay for something if I can't profit from it?
--
Asterisk is very happy on dual core. It greatly reduces load. We just
put a Pentium-D in poduction last week and it is working verry well.
We have a Core 2 Duo on order that we should be putting in production
next week.
MATT---
Hi Matt!
Thank you for this information. Can you please
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
My home Asterisk server is running dual proc dual core zeon 3ghz, seems
happy, no crashes that I didn't bring about myself. ;)
mpg123 does occasionally hang a pid at 100% now and then, but it does that
on single proc/single core
I believe asterisk for the most part is single threaded, you will get some advantages by having other system processes use the extra Processor/Core, but I don't think asterisk will use alot of the other CPU.
On 9/25/06, Tomislav Parčina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Asterisk is very happy on dual
For what we do with Asterisk(lots of meetme and Zap - IAX2) It does
spread the load across both cores. In our initial comparisons for
equal call traffic, the P4-D had half or the average loadavg for a 6
hour time period of the P4 of the same speed.
MATT---
On 9/25/06, Tomislav Parčina [EMAIL
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:04:41AM +0200, Tomislav Par?ina wrote:
Sure you don't have any issues, but do you take any advantage of dual
core processor? Why would I pay for something if I can't profit from
it?
Well, it would seem to me that with a little attention to processor
affinity, you
12 matches
Mail list logo
