[asterisk-users] Re: Real-time and priority n

2006-10-08 Thread Tony Mountifield
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ronald Wiplinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it exclusive? Either Realtime or priority n ??? If so, what is the better way? I believe 'n' is just a shorthand way of writing previous line + 1, and gets converted into an actual number as the dialplan is compiled.

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Real-time and priority n

2006-10-08 Thread Brian Capouch
Tony Mountifield wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ronald Wiplinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it exclusive? Either Realtime or priority n ??? If so, what is the better way? I believe 'n' is just a shorthand way of writing previous line + 1, and gets converted into an actual number as

Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Real-time and priority n

2006-10-08 Thread Ronald Wiplinger
Brian Capouch wrote: Tony Mountifield wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ronald Wiplinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it exclusive? Either Realtime or priority n ??? If so, what is the better way? I believe 'n' is just a shorthand way of writing previous line + 1, and gets converted