Re: [asterisk-users] Zap Codec

2008-04-15 Thread Jeremy Mann
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Zap Codec This is SIP channel you need to limit. Forcing ulaw only, the Polycom will fall back to ulaw. Per peer, in your sip.conf: disallow=all allow=ulaw From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy Mann Sent

Re: [asterisk-users] Zap Codec

2008-04-15 Thread Eric Wieling
calls, I only want ulaw used when SIPPEER-ZAP is the case. *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Darryl Dunkin *Sent:* Monday, April 14, 2008 9:01 PM *To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Zap Codec

Re: [asterisk-users] Zap Codec

2008-04-15 Thread Jeremy Mann
perhaps? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 8:05 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Zap Codec The PSTN only allows ulaw or alaw (depending

Re: [asterisk-users] Zap Codec

2008-04-15 Thread Eric Wieling
- Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Zap Codec The PSTN only allows ulaw or alaw (depending on your location). You CANNOT send calls in any other codec over a PSTN line. Generally, if you want to use G729 then you must buy a G729 license (with a few exceptions

Re: [asterisk-users] Zap Codec

2008-04-15 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Tuesday 15 April 2008 07:40:47 Jeremy Mann wrote: But I want my polycom to attempt g729 on SIPPEER-SIPPEER calls, I only want ulaw used when SIPPEER-ZAP is the case. Set(_SIP_CODEC=ulaw) Dial(Zap/g0/...) -- Tilghman ___ -- Bandwidth and

Re: [asterisk-users] Zap Codec

2008-04-15 Thread Eric Wieling
That would work just spiffy if you are calling another SIP device, but by the time the call gets to that point in the dialplan the codec of the originating device has already been chosen and set in stone. Tilghman Lesher wrote: On Tuesday 15 April 2008 07:40:47 Jeremy Mann wrote: But I want

Re: [asterisk-users] Zap Codec

2008-04-15 Thread Jeremy Mann
AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Zap Codec That would work just spiffy if you are calling another SIP device, but by the time the call gets to that point in the dialplan the codec of the originating device has already been chosen and set

Re: [asterisk-users] Zap Codec

2008-04-15 Thread Eric Wieling
/156-083514c0, ) in new stack -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 9:43 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Zap Codec That would work

Re: [asterisk-users] Zap Codec

2008-04-15 Thread Jeremy Mann
). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 10:15 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Zap Codec If you want to get a G729 call to go via Zap you must purchase

Re: [asterisk-users] Zap Codec

2008-04-15 Thread Darryl Dunkin
: [asterisk-users] Zap Codec I guess that's my frustration, I don't want it g729, I want it ulaw, I just wish Zap did codec negotiation from the client. It'd be a nice option instead of automatically trying to translate if it's not ulaw. Could save some processor overhead(obviously at the expense

Re: [asterisk-users] Zap Codec

2008-04-15 Thread Jeremy Mann
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darryl Dunkin Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 1:37 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Zap Codec Asterisk builds two channels and bridges them together. If the codecs mis-match then it must transcode, the negotiation

Re: [asterisk-users] Zap Codec

2008-04-15 Thread Darryl Dunkin
: [asterisk-users] Zap Codec Correct, but if I have two sip peers, one with G729ulaw, the other with gsmulaw, they will negotiate before trying to send audio. With ZAP, it tries to transcode whatever it receives into ulaw, period. No negotiation to even tell the client to send ulaw if capable

Re: [asterisk-users] Zap Codec

2008-04-15 Thread Mojo with Horan Company, LLC
In the sip peer definition, disallow=all allow=g729 allow=ulaw SHOULD work. Asterisk can't transcode g729, so it should fall on ulaw for the ZAP calls. But, when your polycoms talk with each other, as long as all necessary REINVITEs happen, they should use the 729 codec I believe. Remember

Re: [asterisk-users] Zap Codec

2008-04-15 Thread Ex Vito
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:37 PM, Mojo with Horan Company, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the sip peer definition, disallow=all allow=g729 allow=ulaw SHOULD work. Asterisk can't transcode g729, so it should fall on ulaw for the ZAP calls. But, when your polycoms talk with each

[asterisk-users] Zap Codec

2008-04-14 Thread Jeremy Mann
Is there a way to force Zap channels to only use ulaw, and not even attempt g729 negotiation? My polycom 550 has G729,ulaw as priority, the Zap always fails b/c I'm not licensed for the codec on the asterisk box. This e-mail, facsimile, or letter and any files

Re: [asterisk-users] Zap Codec

2008-04-14 Thread Darryl Dunkin
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Zap Codec Is there a way to force Zap channels to only use ulaw, and not even attempt g729 negotiation? My polycom 550 has G729,ulaw as priority, the Zap always fails b/c I'm not licensed for the codec