In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Tilghman Lesher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 04 October 2007 07:07:47 Barzilai Spinak wrote:
All this discussion is pointless. As pointless as the discussion of
assembly versus high-level languages decades ago.
As one of the main architects, I don't
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 09:17 +, Tony Mountifield wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Tilghman Lesher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 04 October 2007 07:07:47 Barzilai Spinak wrote:
All this discussion is pointless. As pointless as the discussion of
assembly versus high-level
I just got the 2nd edition Asterisk book from O'Reilly, and was
surprised
to find nothing in there about AEL, except a mention of extensions.ael
on
page 471.
This is too bad. A preliminary chapter, an intro into AEL, why it's
valuable, etc. would have been very welcome. Even an appendix of
Michael Collins wrote:
I just got the 2nd edition Asterisk book from O'Reilly, and was
surprised
to find nothing in there about AEL, except a mention of extensions.ael
on
page 471.
This is too bad. A preliminary chapter, an intro into AEL, why it's
valuable, etc. would have been very
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 09:17 +, Tony Mountifield wrote:
I just got the 2nd edition Asterisk book from O'Reilly, and was surprised
to find nothing in there about AEL, except a mention of extensions.ael on
page 471.
That's because we were rushed on the book, and none of the authors has
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 08:40 -0700, Michael Collins wrote:
This is too bad. A preliminary chapter, an intro into AEL, why it's
valuable, etc. would have been very welcome. Even an appendix of a few
pages with examples and references to on-line documentation would have
been helpful. I don't
You know, you don't have to wait for the 3rd edition... you could
always
write something yourself and post it on the web, or join the (mostly
dormant, unfortunately) Asterisk Documentation Project. :-)
-Jared
Well, I could, if I _could_! :) I was hoping to learn AEL from the new
book... my
All this discussion is pointless. As pointless as the discussion of
assembly versus high-level languages decades ago.
Except most people rooting for extension.conf don't even have the
technical and conceptual amplitude to understand what they are talking
about... they just want some telephony
On Thursday 04 October 2007 07:07:47 Barzilai Spinak wrote:
All this discussion is pointless. As pointless as the discussion of
assembly versus high-level languages decades ago.
As one of the main architects, I don't find this discussion pointless. My
personal opinion of AEL is that it's
In my opinion the dialplan isn't where that logic belongs.
/b
On Oct 3, 2007, at 12:32 AM, Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello,
I see that most people are using the extensions.conf syntax (most
of the
examples and questions here use that syntax). recently
Where would you suggest all the logic goes Brian?
Garth
Garth van Sittert
BSc (Physics Computer Science)
-
Main: 08600 BITCO
Phone: +27 (0)11 875 6900
Fax:+27 (0)11 875 6901
Mobile: +27 (0)83 791 6662
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSN:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web:
You have various scripting languages things like that can go in!
/b
On Oct 3, 2007, at 4:12 AM, Garth van Sittert wrote:
Where would you suggest all the logic goes Brian?
Garth
Garth van Sittert
BSc (Physics Computer Science)
-
Main: 08600 BITCO
Phone: +27 (0)11 875
Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444 wrote:
Hello,
I see that most people are using the extensions.conf syntax (most of the
examples and questions here use that syntax). recently I've translated all my
dial plan to AEL syntax and I find it much easier, especially when you need
IFs.
Why
Lee Jenkins wrote:
Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444 wrote:
Hello,
I see that most people are using the extensions.conf syntax (most of the
examples and questions here use that syntax). recently I've translated all my
dial plan to AEL syntax and I find it much easier, especially when
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian West
Sent: 3. oktober 2007 15:18
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] extensions.conf vs. AEL
You have various scripting languages things like that can go
Let us not forget that AEL cannot be stored in a database therefore
rendering you unable to utilize realtime.
AEL converted into standard extensions.conf syntax in the dialplan.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
On Oct 3, 2007, at 9:39 AM, Jon Schøpzinsky wrote:
Wouldnt that take a very large portion of datapower, to startup the
parsers and such, instead of having the whole dialplan natively in
Asterisk.
We always try to do as much as possible in dialplan, so that we are
not reliant on external
Lee Jenkins wrote:
Why most people don't use it? Am I missing something?
I think it looks too much like C.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
Let us not forget that AEL cannot be stored in a database therefore
rendering you unable to utilize realtime.
AEL converted into standard extensions.conf syntax in the dialplan.
Doesn't this render having used AEL pointless?
--
Thank you and have a
Its just a different way to express the same thing in a more fluid way.
/b
On Oct 3, 2007, at 10:33 AM, Anthony Francis wrote:
Doesn't this render having used AEL pointless?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
To each his own. I like the flat files personally, they are more fluid
to me.
Thanks,
Steve
Brian West wrote:
Its just a different way to express the same thing in a more fluid way.
/b
On Oct 3, 2007, at 10:33 AM, Anthony Francis wrote:
Doesn't this render having used AEL pointless?
I'm growing fond of XML.
/b
On Oct 3, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Steve Totaro wrote:
To each his own. I like the flat files personally, they are more
fluid
to me.
Thanks,
Steve
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 09:33 -0600, Anthony Francis wrote:
Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
Let us not forget that AEL cannot be stored in a database therefore
rendering you unable to utilize realtime.
AEL converted into standard extensions.conf syntax in the dialplan.
Hello,
I see that most people are using the extensions.conf syntax (most of the
examples and questions here use that syntax). recently I've translated all my
dial plan to AEL syntax and I find it much easier, especially when you need
IFs.
Why most people don't use it? Am I missing
24 matches
Mail list logo
