RE: AW: AW: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 200 with two extns defined anyone?

2004-01-05 Thread VoiceLynx
Christian has been testing the snom code against on of our Asterisk systems. 2.03f did address some multiple registration issues but the newest snom 200 version is 2.03g - that has addressed some additional registration issues. New versions for the other snom phones are expected today. Richard

AW: AW: AW: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 200 with two extns defined anyone?

2004-01-05 Thread Christian Stredicke
-Users] Snom 200 with two extns defined anyone? Christian has been testing the snom code against on of our Asterisk systems. 2.03f did address some multiple registration issues but the newest snom 200 version is 2.03g - that has addressed some additional registration issues. New versions

Re: AW: AW: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 200 with two extns defined anyone?

2004-01-04 Thread Olle E. Johansson
Michael Graves wrote: Please forgive me if this is a silly question. I've been following this thread in the hope that I could put my * server and snom 200 into full-time service very soon. I need to find out how to have the lines Olle Wrote: I've opened a bug

Re: AW: AW: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 200 with two extns defined anyone?

2004-01-04 Thread Rich Adamson
: Re: AW: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 200 with two extns defined anyone? Christian Stredicke wrote: We at snom have problems with Asterisk when we receive calls without the line indication. When we register we place a contact like this: REGISTER sip:asterisk SIP/2.0 Contact: sip:[EMAIL

Re: AW: AW: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 200 with two extns defined anyone?

2004-01-04 Thread Michael Graves
/download/share. Christian -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Olle E. Johansson Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. Januar 2004 11:57 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: AW: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 200 with two extns defined

Re: AW: AW: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 200 with two extns defined anyone?

2004-01-04 Thread Rich Adamson
Mike, What form of config is required in * to get 1 extensions available. Single login/registry or multiple? Do I have to specify lines per Christiasn's earlier mail? In my implementation, the two extns are treated as though they are separate phones with separate (independent) logins, like:

AW: AW: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 200 with two extns defined anyone?

2004-01-03 Thread Christian Stredicke
: Donnerstag, 1. Januar 2004 11:57 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: AW: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 200 with two extns defined anyone? Christian Stredicke wrote: We at snom have problems with Asterisk when we receive calls without the line indication. When we register we place a contact like

Re: AW: AW: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 200 with two extns defined anyone?

2004-01-03 Thread Michael Graves
: Donnerstag, 1. Januar 2004 11:57 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: AW: [Asterisk-Users] Snom 200 with two extns defined anyone? Christian Stredicke wrote: We at snom have problems with Asterisk when we receive calls without the line indication. When we register we place a contact like