Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released

2004-01-22 Thread WipeOut
Greg Boehnlein wrote: Hello all, Per my last message to the list, and my promise to the Developers that I'd create RPMS if they released 0.7.0, I would like to announce the availability of experimental RPMS for Asterisk release 0.7.1. These are targeted at RedHat 7.3 systems, running the

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released

2004-01-22 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, WipeOut wrote: This is great to see.. but why RH7.3 (or RH8 for that matter) since it has already been EOL'ed by RH?? Couple of reasons.. 1. It is a stable, known quantity that uses solid components and closely mirrors the environment that a lot of people develop

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released

2004-01-22 Thread WipeOut
Greg Boehnlein wrote: On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, WipeOut wrote: This is great to see.. but why RH7.3 (or RH8 for that matter) since it has already been EOL'ed by RH?? Couple of reasons.. 1. It is a stable, known quantity that uses solid components and closely mirrors the environment that a

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released

2004-01-22 Thread Senad Jordanovic
WipeOut wrote: Greg Boehnlein wrote: On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, WipeOut wrote: This is great to see.. but why RH7.3 (or RH8 for that matter) since it has already been EOL'ed by RH?? Couple of reasons.. 1. It is a stable, known quantity that uses solid components and closely

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released

2004-01-22 Thread WipeOut
Senad Jordanovic wrote: WipeOut wrote: I understand or agree with all of your points.. My biggest problem is that RH has basically dropped me in the poo by killing off their free version and stopping support for all the free versions as well.. I have been looking at alternatives but so far

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released

2004-01-22 Thread Senad Jordanovic
WipeOut wrote: Senad Jordanovic wrote: WipeOut wrote: I understand or agree with all of your points.. My biggest problem is that RH has basically dropped me in the poo by killing off their free version and stopping support for all the free versions as well.. I have been looking at

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released

2004-01-22 Thread David Luyens
PROTECTED] Namens Senad Jordanovic Verzonden: donderdag 22 januari 2004 13:35 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released WipeOut wrote: Senad Jordanovic wrote: WipeOut wrote: I understand or agree with all of your points.. My biggest problem

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released

2004-01-22 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, WipeOut wrote: I understand or agree with all of your points.. My biggest problem is that RH has basically dropped me in the poo by killing off their free version and stopping support for all the free versions as well.. I have been looking at alternatives but so far

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released

2004-01-22 Thread David Luyens
PROTECTED] Namens Senad Jordanovic Verzonden: donderdag 22 januari 2004 13:35 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released WipeOut wrote: Senad Jordanovic wrote: WipeOut wrote: I understand or agree with all of your points.. My biggest problem

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released

2004-01-22 Thread Ken Godee
This is great to see.. but why RH7.3 (or RH8 for that matter) since it has already been EOL'ed by RH?? Couple of reasons.. 1. It is a stable, known quantity that uses solid components and closely mirrors the environment that a lot of people develop Asterisk on. It isn't going to drastically

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released

2004-01-22 Thread WipeOut
Ken Godee wrote: This is great to see.. but why RH7.3 (or RH8 for that matter) since it has already been EOL'ed by RH?? Couple of reasons.. 1. It is a stable, known quantity that uses solid components and closely mirrors the environment that a lot of people develop Asterisk on. It isn't

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released

2004-01-22 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Thursday 22 January 2004 03:08, WipeOut wrote: My biggest problem is that RH has basically dropped me in the poo by killing off their free version and stopping support for all the free versions as well.. I have been looking at alternatives but so far nothing is going to fit the bill.. The

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released

2004-01-22 Thread WipeOut
Tilghman Lesher wrote: On Thursday 22 January 2004 03:08, WipeOut wrote: My biggest problem is that RH has basically dropped me in the poo by killing off their free version and stopping support for all the free versions as well.. I have been looking at alternatives but so far nothing is going

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released

2004-01-22 Thread Jonathan Moore
I am researching the use of White Box Enterprise Linux. Someone else in a similar position with a bunch of 7.x boxes created it. He took all the SRPM files for REL v3 and removed all the Red Hat logos and trademarks. It is the same software as Enterprise but you can freely copy it. They also

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released

2004-01-22 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, WipeOut wrote: Ken Godee wrote: This is great to see.. but why RH7.3 (or RH8 for that matter) since it has already been EOL'ed by RH?? Couple of reasons.. 1. It is a stable, known quantity that uses solid components and closely mirrors the environment

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released

2004-01-22 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Tilghman Lesher wrote: On Thursday 22 January 2004 03:08, WipeOut wrote: My biggest problem is that RH has basically dropped me in the poo by killing off their free version and stopping support for all the free versions as well.. I have been looking at alternatives but

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released

2004-01-22 Thread JC
: Thursday, January 22, 2004 11:29 AM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released On Thursday 22 January 2004 03:08, WipeOut wrote: My biggest problem is that RH has basically dropped me in the poo by killing off their free version and stopping support for all the free

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released

2004-01-22 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 12:17, Jonathan Moore wrote: I am researching the use of White Box Enterprise Linux. Someone else in a similar position with a bunch of 7.x boxes created it. He took all the SRPM files for REL v3 and removed all the Red Hat logos and trademarks. It is the same software as

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released

2004-01-22 Thread Fran Boon
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 18:17, Jonathan Moore wrote: I am researching the use of White Box Enterprise Linux. Someone else in a similar position with a bunch of 7.x boxes created it. He took all the SRPM files for REL v3 and removed all the Red Hat logos and trademarks. It is the same software as

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released

2004-01-22 Thread WipeOut
Greg Boehnlein wrote: On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, WipeOut wrote: Ken Godee wrote: The problem with running servers based on RH 6.x, 7.x and 8 is that RH is not providing errata (security specifically) updates any more.. If you servers are not connected to the internet then, sure stay with

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.1 RH 7.3 RPMS Released

2004-01-22 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, WipeOut wrote: Personal opinion here, but if you are relying on RedHat to be your security provider, you have no business administering a system connected to the Internet. Sure, they make it easier, but common sense and a solid understanding of the applications and