Re: [Asterisk-Users] QOS / Cisco / Asterisk

2005-01-19 Thread Jeffrey C. Ollie
Sorry for the late, late reply, but I don't follow the -users list closely. On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 10:43 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's wrong with doing it by port? If it is possible that something else out there may use the same TOS flags as Asterisk, by prioritizing port 4569 (IAX2

RE: [Asterisk-Users] QOS / Cisco / Asterisk

2005-01-05 Thread Matt Schulte
Title: Message Yes yes, we've been through all that actually :-) We did find out it was one of the 3550's reseting the TOS. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 2:40 PMTo:

RE: [Asterisk-Users] QOS / Cisco / Asterisk

2005-01-04 Thread Matt Schulte
Yes yes, your right. I forget these switches are smart!!! ;-) -Original Message- From: Julio Arruda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 4:41 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] QOS / Cisco / Asterisk Matt

Re: [Asterisk-Users] QOS / Cisco / Asterisk

2005-01-04 Thread Jeffrey C. Ollie
On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 13:53 -0600, Matt Schulte wrote: We're trying to PQ (Priority Queue) packets on a Cisco using ACL's. What we're trying to avoid is hardcoding the IP address in the ACL. We were trying to match by TOS set by Asterisk however it seems we've run into a snag where the packet

Re: [Asterisk-Users] QOS / Cisco / Asterisk

2005-01-04 Thread rsenykoff
snip We're trying to PQ (Priority Queue) packets on a Cisco using ACL's. What we're trying to avoid is hardcoding the IP address in the ACL. We were trying to match by TOS set by Asterisk however it seems we've run into a snag where the packet TOS tends to get reset somewhere on our network.

RE: [Asterisk-Users] QOS / Cisco / Asterisk

2005-01-04 Thread Matt Schulte
What's wrong with doing it by port? We're actually using SIP to terminate calls, going by rtp.conf the ports could range several thousand ports. What we're going for is only honoring TOS for that particular customer, luckily these are T1 customers hosted on our routers. They understand that

RE: [Asterisk-Users] QOS / Cisco / Asterisk

2005-01-04 Thread rsenykoff
snip What's wrong with doing it by port? We're actually using SIP to terminate calls, going by rtp.conf the ports could range several thousand ports. What we're going for is only honoring TOS for that particular customer, luckily these are T1 customers hosted on our routers. They understand

Re: [Asterisk-Users] QOS / Cisco / Asterisk

2005-01-03 Thread Julio Arruda
Matt Schulte wrote: We're trying to PQ (Priority Queue) packets on a Cisco using ACL's. What we're trying to avoid is hardcoding the IP address in the ACL. We were trying to match by TOS set by Asterisk however it seems we've run into a snag where the packet TOS tends to get reset somewhere on our