Hi,
QoS is nice (and important) but only works within a FULLY controlled end to
end link.
Inside a BIG enterprise LAN, on leased lines its OK.
Using end to end MPLS should also be ok
Mind that some provider sell MPLS but it is not their own MPLS end to end.
Going from one provider on MPLS to
On 4 Apr 2005, at 09:25, Shaoul Jacobson - TELLINK wrote:
Hi,
QoS is nice (and important) but only works within a FULLY controlled
end to
end link.
Inside a BIG enterprise LAN, on leased lines its OK.
Using end to end MPLS should also be ok
Mind that some provider sell MPLS but it is not their
Hi,
I'm not sure I totally agree.
Good, we do agree on some :)
I also agree with some of your remarks
(no flame war)
It is also useful if you control the narrowest pipe.
I agree. But I disagree about the definition of the narrowest pipe.
A well configured router there will slow outgoing
tim panton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 4 Apr 2005, at 09:25, Shaoul Jacobson - TELLINK wrote:
Hi,
QoS is nice (and important) but only works within a FULLY controlled
end to
end link.
Inside a BIG enterprise LAN, on leased lines its OK.
Using end to end MPLS should also be ok
Mind that
On 03-Apr-2005, Tim Pushor wrote:
I prefer PF's approach to security first, convenience second, and I
*really* like the fact that PF has a real parser. As the requements get
more complex, having everything in one file, and very readable and
structured is a huge plus. Also, the integration
I'm not sure about QoS, but I do run ATLQ on FreeBSD/PF. In a SOHO
environment where there is likely to be DSL or cable, I find it very
useful (on the upload side at least, which is usually a problem on
asyncrhonous connections).
I can max out my pipe and hear no effect of it on the phone.
At 15:36 04/04/2005, you wrote:
On 03-Apr-2005, Tim Pushor wrote:
I prefer PF's approach to security first, convenience second, and I
*really* like the fact that PF has a real parser. As the requements get
more complex, having everything in one file, and very readable and
structured is a huge
-Commercial Discussion
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 3:57
AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Router with
QoS recommendations
At 15:36 04/04/2005, you wrote:On 03-Apr-2005, Tim
Pushor wrote: I prefer PF's approach to security first,
convenience second, and I *really* like the fact
I'd be willing to write something up on integrating pf with * behind a
NAT using ALTQ for traffic shaping if anyone is interested. It'd
probably take me a couple weeks though ..
Tim
James H. Thompson wrote:
Any FreeBSD/OpenBSD solutions we should add to the list at the bottom
of this page?
, April 05, 2005 3:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Router with QoS recommendations
I'd be willing to write something up on integrating pf with * behind a NAT
using ALTQ for traffic shaping if anyone is interested. It'd probably take
me a couple weeks though ..
Tim
James H. Thompson wrote:
Any
Hi!
As I have a Cisco PIX 515, with NO QoS functionality, and Im looking for
a router that does outgoing QoS to put in front of my PIX. Problem is
that Im using my 768/8096Kbit ADSL for both data and VoIP, and as soon
as data is being sent to the internet the sound quality drops to
On Sunday 03 April 2005 06:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi List
As I have a Cisco PIX 515, with NO QoS functionality, and I'm looking for a
router that does outgoing QoS to put in front of my PIX. Problem is that
I'm using my 768/8096Kbit ADSL for both data and VoIP, and as soon as data
is
NVC List Manager wrote:
As usual there's nothing that will beat OpenBSD. Takes 15 minutes to build
following the instructions on the CD cover.
To someone who has never installed OpenBSD (or FreeBSD + pf for that
matter) the learning curve is going to be much much higher than 15
minutes,
On April 3, 2005 08:13 am, Tim Pushor wrote:
To someone who has never installed OpenBSD (or FreeBSD + pf for that
matter) the learning curve is going to be much much higher than 15
minutes, although one you learn PF you will never go back!
I've never seen the great advantage to pf over ip and
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 3:33 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Router with QoS recommendations
As I have a Cisco PIX 515, with NO QoS functionality,
and I'm looking for a router that does outgoing QoS to put in front of my
PIX.
PixOS
iptables looks very powerful, thats for sure.
I prefer PF's approach to security first, convenience second, and I
*really* like the fact that PF has a real parser. As the requements get
more complex, having everything in one file, and very readable and
structured is a huge plus. Also, the
16 matches
Mail list logo
