RE: [Asterisk-Users] Zaptel HEAD with * Stable?

2005-06-20 Thread Chad Osmond
Yes, I'm running it right now, CVS as of a few days ago, and * 1.0.7 on 2.6.x kernel and FC2. Chad -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rod Bacon Sent: June 20, 2005 2:44 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users]

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Zaptel HEAD with * Stable?

2005-06-20 Thread Florian Overkamp
Hi, -Original Message- Will the CVS HEAD version of the Zaptel drivers work with the STABLE branch of *? Err, why specifically would you want that ? Florian ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Zaptel HEAD with * Stable?

2005-06-20 Thread Doug Lytle
Florian Overkamp wrote: Hi, -Original Message- Will the CVS HEAD version of the Zaptel drivers work with the STABLE branch of *? Err, why specifically would you want that ? Florian, In our case, the CVS drivers (At the time that I did it) showed enhanced information

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Zaptel HEAD with * Stable?

2005-06-20 Thread Seth Remington
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 12:28 -0400, Doug Lytle wrote: Florian Overkamp wrote: Hi, -Original Message- Will the CVS HEAD version of the Zaptel drivers work with the STABLE branch of *? Err, why specifically would you want that ? Florian, In our case,

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Zaptel HEAD with * Stable?

2005-06-20 Thread Florian Overkamp
Hi, -Original Message- -Original Message- Will the CVS HEAD version of the Zaptel drivers work with the STABLE branch of *? Err, why specifically would you want that ? In our case, the CVS drivers (At the time that I did it) showed enhanced information coming across