I meant the 24th, yes. Could there be any problem with the support to the ATT
maintenance protocol? We have checked the libpri code, in q931.c, and there
appears to be a simple response to messages that have the protocol
discriminator set to ATT maintenance: a copy with a changed byte.
I've never seen a PRI dchannel on a T1 on a timeslot other than the
24th. Are you sure that it's really on channel 23?
I think he meant channel 23 of channels 0~23, aka the 24th channel.
-MC
Matthew Fredrickson
On Mar 20, 2007, at 8:54 AM, Kanelbullar wrote:
Thanks for your answer,
