Al Baker schrieb:
Are you saying the * server does NOT TRY to re-establish the BD connection ?
The MySQL Realtime driver _does_ reconnect.
(Search for mysql_reconnect() in res_config_mysql.c)
If NOT, what happens to you CDR records ?
Same thing with cdr_addon_mysql.c - it tries to reconnect.
Steve Totaro schrieb:
I would not run MySQL on the local box. I would simple use Asterisk's
csv CDRs and then use some script to import the CSVs into a database
residing on another server using some sort of script. Depending on
your needs, you could probably run that during low call volume.
5 maj 2008 kl. 19.58 skrev Tilghman Lesher:
On Monday 05 May 2008 11:24, Johansson Olle E wrote:
5 maj 2008 kl. 17.51 skrev Tilghman Lesher:
On Monday 05 May 2008 09:45, Johansson Olle E wrote:
Another issue that we need to fix with the MYSQL driver is that
we're
lacking a connection
On Tuesday 06 May 2008 02:16:47 Johansson Olle E wrote:
5 maj 2008 kl. 19.58 skrev Tilghman Lesher:
On Monday 05 May 2008 11:24, Johansson Olle E wrote:
5 maj 2008 kl. 17.51 skrev Tilghman Lesher:
On Monday 05 May 2008 09:45, Johansson Olle E wrote:
Another issue that we need to fix with
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Tuesday 06 May 2008 02:16:47 Johansson Olle E wrote:
5 maj 2008 kl. 19.58 skrev Tilghman Lesher:
On Monday 05 May 2008 11:24, Johansson Olle E wrote:
5 maj 2008 kl. 17.51 skrev Tilghman Lesher:
On Monday 05 May 2008 09:45, Johansson Olle
Are you saying the * server does NOT TRY to re-establish the BD connection ?
Does your whole * SERVER freeze ?
If NOT, what happens to you CDR records ?
Anthony Francis wrote:
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Tuesday 06 May 2008 02:16:47 Johansson Olle E wrote:
5 maj 2008 kl. 19.58
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Anthony Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Tuesday 06 May 2008 02:16:47 Johansson Olle E wrote:
5 maj 2008 kl. 19.58 skrev Tilghman Lesher:
On Monday 05 May 2008 11:24, Johansson Olle E wrote:
5 maj 2008 kl. 17.51
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 4:21 AM, Al Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would appreciate any and all advice on what appears to be a BUG (or a
brainfart on my part) with the MySQL add-on for Asterisk this is of FEDORA 8
fully patched with Asterisk Addons 1-4-6 with the Asterisk 1.4.18.1
It
I looked all over VOIP-INFO and ATFOT and could not find anything that
said or even suggested not using the mysql driver.(except NOT to have
BOTH drivers loaded at the same time). I could easily be missing
something. But the apparent BUG I am seeing is at such a Basic and
Simple Level of
User intervention is required Al. You need to open a bug report on
mantis and anyone can edit the wiki (this is the nature of a wiki).
http://bugs.digium.com/main_page.php
Anyways, I am fairly certain that the UnixODBC connector is the
preferred way of connecting to MySQL.
Thanks,
Steve Totaro
A quote from Tilghman Lesher from a previous post.
That's fine, but I have had the most horrid results using any distribution-
supplied ODBC drivers. The best results are obtained by source-compiling
the latest ODBC drivers, whether they be the MySQL ODBC Connector 3.51 or
PsqlODBC. UnixODBC is
Another issue that we need to fix with the MYSQL driver is that we're
lacking a connection pool. Everything seems to be handled over one
connection to Mysql, which causes issues.
Any MySQL developers out there that can help us fix this? We need
someone that has been developing towards the
Steve Totaro wrote:
A quote from Tilghman Lesher from a previous post.
That's fine, but I have had the most horrid results using any distribution-
supplied ODBC drivers. The best results are obtained by source-compiling
the latest ODBC drivers, whether they be the MySQL ODBC Connector 3.51
I must be overlooking it, I pulled up the electronic version and
searched for and read every instance where ODBC was mentioned and I
could not find a single place where it said
ODBC was to be the only or even the best method. If so I would never
ever have gone down this road :(
Quote And
On Monday 05 May 2008 10:16, Al Baker wrote:
I must be overlooking it, I pulled up the electronic version and
searched for and read every instance where ODBC was mentioned and I
could not find a single place where it said
ODBC was to be the only or even the best method. If so I would never
On Monday 05 May 2008 09:45, Johansson Olle E wrote:
Another issue that we need to fix with the MYSQL driver is that we're
lacking a connection pool. Everything seems to be handled over one
connection to Mysql, which causes issues.
That's not true. The MYSQL app generally uses multiple
5 maj 2008 kl. 17.51 skrev Tilghman Lesher:
On Monday 05 May 2008 09:45, Johansson Olle E wrote:
Another issue that we need to fix with the MYSQL driver is that we're
lacking a connection pool. Everything seems to be handled over one
connection to Mysql, which causes issues.
That's not
On Monday 05 May 2008 11:24, Johansson Olle E wrote:
5 maj 2008 kl. 17.51 skrev Tilghman Lesher:
On Monday 05 May 2008 09:45, Johansson Olle E wrote:
Another issue that we need to fix with the MYSQL driver is that we're
lacking a connection pool. Everything seems to be handled over one
On May 5, 2008 01:58:42 pm Tilghman Lesher wrote:
Hmm. Haven't found any Digium Stockholm office to discuss with ;-)
That hasn't stopped any of the Canadian employees. :-)
That's because nothing stops Canadians, short of Hockey Night in Canada :-)
-A.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 10:21:53AM +0200, Josu Lazkano Lete wrote:
hello, I have a A400P01 PCI from OpenVox.
I have installed some extension and a VoipBuste account to callo out of my
LAN.
How can I receive and send calls from a nd to outside by my analog line???
I want to receive dthe
-- Forwarded message --From:William Piper
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To:Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.comDate:Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:08:23 -0400
Subject:Re: [Asterisk-Users] Help, please help -- IAX2 softphone to server on LANSure sounds
On 28 Sep 2006, at 21:39, Wolfgang_Borgon wrote:
David,
Yes, I've also forwarded port 4569 to the server.
Since the router is forwarding to the server, I cannot
forward it to the client as well -- however, as the
client isn't going out past the LAN, it shouldn't
matter... unless there's
Sure sounds like a firewall issue... if you pinging port 4069 and it is not coming back, that sounds like a firewall problem. Try taking down your iptables and then try see what happens.
bp
On 9/28/06, Wolfgang_Borgon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,Yes, I've also forwarded port 4569 to the
David,
Yes, I've also forwarded port 4569 to the server.
Since the router is forwarding to the server, I cannot
forward it to the client as well -- however, as the
client isn't going out past the LAN, it shouldn't
matter... unless there's something else going on that
I don't know about.
Thanks
OTR Comm wrote:
I did give the key a passphrase, could this be the problem? Do I have
to put the passphrase in some config file?
If your keys have passphrases, then you must run the 'init keys' CLI
command to enter the passphrase before the keys can be loaded.
It's much simpler to just
Hello Kevin,
If your keys have passphrases, then you must run the 'init keys' CLI
command to enter the passphrase before the keys can be loaded.
It's much simpler to just not use passphrases and instead protect your
private key every other way that you can :-)
Yeah I rebuilt my keys
David,
Yes, I've also forwarded port 4569 to the server.
Since the router is forwarding to the server, I cannot
forward it to the client as well -- however, as the
client isn't going out past the LAN, it shouldn't
matter... unless there's something else going on that
I don't know about.
Thanks
Wolfgang wrote: -
I've already sunk several hours into this without any
real progress, so I'd really appreciate any help My
task is simple -- establish a connection between a
softphone on XP ProSP2 to a Asterisk server on Linux
FC4 over a LAN through a Netgear router. The server
will then go
David,
Yes, I've also forwarded port 4569 to the server.
Since the router is forwarding to the server, I cannot
forward it to the client as well -- however, as the
client isn't going out past the LAN, it shouldn't
matter... unless there's something else going on that
I don't know about.
Thanks
David:
Also port 1:2 is a good idea to forward to the server as well..
David,
Yes, I've also forwarded port 4569 to the server.
Since the router is forwarding to the server, I cannot
forward it to the client as well -- however, as the
client isn't going out past the LAN, it
David:
Also port 1:2 is a good idea to forward to the server as well..
Only needed for SIP. 4569 is all that is required for IAX2.
David,
Yes, I've also forwarded port 4569 to the server.
Since the router is forwarding to the server, I cannot
forward it to the client as well --
David,
Yes, I've also forwarded port 4569 to the server.
Since the router is forwarding to the server, I cannot
forward it to the client as well -- however, as the
client isn't going out past the LAN, it shouldn't
matter... unless there's something else going on that
I don't know about.
Thanks
http://geekgazette.com
has a "how to" for Broadvoice
-Kerry
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mr.
barkerSent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 6:03 AMTo: 'Asterisk
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'Subject:
[Asterisk-Users] Help Please Multiple Users for
You arent going to make this happen as you describe. Vonage is not a good
service to use with Asterisk. To quote from the Wiki:
Vonage service is locked to the ATA they send you. It is not possible to
connect Asterisk (or any other SIP UA) directly to your main Vonage service.
Kerry Garrison wrote:
You arent going to make this happen as you describe. Vonage is not a good
service to use with Asterisk. To quote from the Wiki:
Vonage service is locked to the ATA they send you. It is not possible to connect Asterisk (or any other SIP UA) directly to your main Vonage
I was only able to get the softphone account to make inbound calls on
one sip.conf config, or outbound calls on another sip.conf config. I
didnt investigate the issue completely, but from what I could tell, they
wouldnt allow multiple SIP sessions from the same IP address. I didnt
try running
Im a newbie to this list (joined today).
Other than Broadvoice, what voip providers work well with Asterisk?
I'd like a service that will allow trunking so that I can have more than
one outbound/inbound call if possible.
JD
Kerry Garrison wrote:
You arent going to make this happen as you
-Users] Help please for newb on Asterisk to Vonage
Kerry Garrison wrote:
You arent going to make this happen as you describe. Vonage is not a good
service to use with Asterisk. To quote from the Wiki:
Vonage service is locked to the ATA they send you. It is not possible to
connect Asterisk (or any
Check the list archive. This thread just happened a couple days ago.
A couple that I remember as supporting IAX:
voipjet.com
nufone.net
You also might try opbx.com
JD Austin wrote:
Im a newbie to this list (joined today).
Other than Broadvoice, what voip providers work well with Asterisk?
I made the Vonage mistake too. Cost me a hundred bucks!
They will hit you with a Disconnect Fee, if you don't return their
equipment in the original box.
Sux, if you ask me.
Vonage does offer an attractive flat rate for 500 minutes.
You could, purchase a digium card, and plug the Vonage POTS
Thanks, I will begin my testing
Erick
- Original Message -
From: Race Vanderdecken [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 8:18 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Help Please
Greetings Mr. Weber,
Remember the rule in mathematics that is much easier to solve for one
variable.
You stateed you are having a problem with the 1088 extension. If look
like you are trying to make a call from the 404 extension to the 1088
extension.
1.
If you have 6 ATA's running shut 5 of
in my opinion, asterisk is the best solution. it is
relatively very cheap, asterisk is free and u can use
any soft phones to do calls. you can find cheap digium
cards, around $400+. you can set up any normal phone
to FXS cards. yu can do conference call and voicemails
in asterisk.
this link may
in my opinion, asterisk is the best solution. it is
relatively very cheap, asterisk is free and u can use
any soft phones to do calls. you can find cheap digium
cards, around $400+. you can set up any normal phone
to FXS cards. yu can do conference call and voicemails
in asterisk.
this link may
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 10:52, Michael Welter wrote:
Hi,
My PBX/key system failed when building power was switched off and then
back on. The service rep says the PBX unit is so old that it is not
repairable.
The unit has 8 incoming POTS lines and 12 multiline sets. There are
voice
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 10:52, Michael Welter wrote:
Hi,
My PBX/key system failed when building power was switched off and then
back on. The service rep says the PBX unit is so old that it is not
repairable.
The unit has 8 incoming POTS lines and 12 multiline sets. There are
voice
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 09:52:13AM -0700, Michael Welter wrote:
Hi,
My PBX/key system failed when building power was switched off and then
back on. The service rep says the PBX unit is so old that it is not
repairable.
The unit has 8 incoming POTS lines and 12 multiline sets. There
-Original Message-
From: Barry Porch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, I run ztcfg -vvv and it tells me that there are 0 channels.
Barry, are you modifying the zaptel.conf file in /etc or /etc/asterisk.
If the latter, try ztcfg -vvv -c /etc/asterisk/zaptel.conf. I had a
similar issue
Yes, I run ztcfg -vvv and it tells me that there are 0 channels.
-Original Message-
From: Brian West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 6:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] help please with single t1 configuration
did you happen to run ztcfg
did you happen to run ztcfg after you setup the configs?
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, Barry Porch wrote:
I am attempting to set up an Asterisk box which I am only concerned with
getting a single T1 working. I have this T1 connected to my PBX and I
am looking at using Asterisk as a conference bridge.
50 matches
Mail list logo
