On Monday 24 April 2006 11:42, Ken Godee wrote:
cat5 is NOT T1 cable and if any telco/vendor tried
to install it in my location I'd have them pull it and
put in the proper cabling.
T1 cable is generally Cat3 is it not? That's certainly how the old T1s loops
were run between the CO and the
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
Insulation (especially such thin insulation) does not prevent crosstalk.
Distance, shielding and tighter twists do.
Ever looked at the underground cable in the street outside your
building? If it's more than 20 years old, it's probably paper-insulated
gel-filled
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Monday 24 April 2006 11:42, Ken Godee wrote:
cat5 is NOT T1 cable and if any telco/vendor tried
to install it in my location I'd have them pull it and
put in the proper cabling.
T1 cable is generally Cat3 is it not? That's certainly how the old T1s loops
were run
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
Insulation (especially such thin insulation) does not prevent crosstalk.
Distance, shielding and tighter twists do.
Ever looked at the underground cable in the street outside your
building? If it's more than 20 years old, it's
On Monday 24 April 2006 12:42, Rich Adamson wrote:
The T1/E1 interface spec's are typically 75 ohm balanced (BNC, E1), 100
ohm balanced, etc.
Ahh yes, this is true. Is that a typical spec for even POTS lines?
I've never bothered to check to see if cat5 cables use the appropriate
mating
Rich Adamson wrote:
I've never bothered to check to see if cat5 cables use the appropriate
mating twisted pairs or not. Since the pinouts are different for cat5 vs
T1 cables, I'd have to guess a single strand is used from two different
twisted pair groups. That wouldn't be cool, but in short
Rich Adamson wrote:
I've never bothered to check to see if cat5 cables use the appropriate
mating twisted pairs or not. Since the pinouts are different for cat5 vs
T1 cables, I'd have to guess a single strand is used from two different
twisted pair groups. That wouldn't be cool, but in short
