On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 12:41:30AM -0500, Steve Totaro wrote:
[snip]
Wow. Didn't know there was a rule... I never got the whole argument.
If the flow is top posting, I top post. If I am certain I can answer
a simple question with a simple answer, sometimes I will just top
post.
The first
As I did two years ago, I'm posting a new thread with the Top Posting
subject rather than hijacking the Paging for Praying thread.
Two questions:
1. Steve K: What do you mean by /coat?
2. How do we change rule #5?
--Don
Don Kelly
PCF Corp
People Come First
651 842-1000
651
Shouldn't there be:
ao2_lock()/ao2_unlock() and ao2_ref()'s
in the ast_readaudio_callback() function
What if a hangup is happening while in this function?
That seems like what could be happening.
Jerry
--
_
-- Bandwidth
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 12:41:30AM -0500, Steve Totaro wrote:
Even more off topic. Can someone smarter than me get the post
totals for each year? I was #1 one year. I am not even talking
about individual post counts though. It just seems the list has
died for the most part.
There is a
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012, Don Kelly wrote:
2. How do we change rule #5?
-1.
--
Thanks in advance,
-
Steve Edwards sedwa...@sedwards.com Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST
Newline
2003, 24471
2004, 48608
2005, 59116
2006, 41215
2007, 26414
2008, 20746
2009, 18304
2010, 14948
2011, 11588
2012, 7542
--
+--+
| James W. Laferriere | SystemTechniques | Give me VMS |
| NetworkSystem Engineer | 3237
On 30/12/2012, Steve Edwards wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012, Don Kelly wrote:
2. How do we change rule #5?
-1.
+ -1 from me too!
Ie I dislike top-posting on mailing lists and if a democratic approach was
taken to rule changes (I have no idea is this is the case?) then I would vote
Hi Roy others.
Sorry for the delayed reply to this thread. The holiday period delayed my
testing of the A510 and C610 range further, but I have now had a chance to give
them a little 'ear time'.
On 12/12/2012, at 5:30 PM, Co-op Vacation Rentals coo...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for testing
On 14/12/2012, at 9:51 AM, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote:
I did notice one more thing:
chan_sip.c:17045 handle_request_register: Registration from
'5001sip:5001%4010.239.46.200@10.239.46.200' failed for '137.52.88.195' -
No matching peer found
Why is there no matching peer I
I'm a +1 for the change, should it come to a vote.
I realize the benefits of bottom-posting, especially when posting inline.
But top-posting keeps things in reverse chronological order so any reader
could catch up quickly on any missed messages in the chain. A new reader
scrolls to the bottom and
I realize the benefits of bottom-posting, especially when posting
inline. But top-posting keeps things in reverse chronological order
so any reader could catch up quickly on any missed messages in the
chain. A new reader scrolls to the bottom and reads up.
What's there to catch up with if you
I suppose I'm one of the few people that remember the content of threads by
subject and easily catch up...
I'm also on my phone 99% of the time time and the way Gmail lays out emails
makes top-posting beneficial to me.
On Dec 29, 2012 8:57 PM, Richard Kenner ken...@gnat.com wrote:
I realize
On 12/29/2012 05:20 PM, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
2003, 24471
2004, 48608
2005, 59116
2006, 41215
2007, 26414
2008, 20746
2009, 18304
2010, 14948
2011, 11588
2012, 7542
If you remove the top-posting thread, it may cut it in half again.
j
--
13 matches
Mail list logo
