Re: [asterisk-users] packet2packet bridging

2014-07-09 Thread Sameer Rathod
Hi, Please clear me on this topic I am confused My log show switching to native rtp. Did this line means that the audio is not coming to the asterisk server any more and asterisk only send the re- invite packet to both the clients ? Am I right or wrong ? On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Mitul

Re: [asterisk-users] packet2packet bridging

2014-07-09 Thread Mitul Limbani
Put sip debug on to know if reinvite packets are sent. On 09-Jul-2014 1:17 PM, Sameer Rathod sam...@hostnsoft.com wrote: Hi, Please clear me on this topic I am confused My log show switching to native rtp. Did this line means that the audio is not coming to the asterisk server any more

Re: [asterisk-users] Database and variables

2014-07-09 Thread Administrator TOOTAI
Le 08/07/2014 16:07, Eric Wieling a écrit : If you are executing database put Agora modele/IVR/AstreinteNagios/1 ${ASTR_State} while in the Asterisk CLI, that won't work. You cannot access DIALPLAN variables from the CLI. I didn't know that, thanks. Will try another way. Regards

Re: [asterisk-users] packet2packet bridging

2014-07-09 Thread Sameer Rathod
Hi Mitul, I checked that the re-invite packet are sent what I want to check is whether the audio packets is going through the server or not ? On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Mitul Limbani mi...@enterux.in wrote: Put sip debug on to know if reinvite packets are sent. On 09-Jul-2014 1:17 PM,

Re: [asterisk-users] packet2packet bridging

2014-07-09 Thread Ishfaq Malik
use tcpdump on the server to see if the RTP traffic is passing through it. On 9 July 2014 10:48, Sameer Rathod sam...@hostnsoft.com wrote: Hi Mitul, I checked that the re-invite packet are sent what I want to check is whether the audio packets is going through the server or not ? On Wed,

[asterisk-users] switching from simple_bridge technology to native_rtp issue

2014-07-09 Thread Sameer Rathod
Hi, with canreinvite=no and directmedia=no I and getting the message in the logs for all calls switching from simple_bridge technology to native_rtp -- Executing [102@mkg:1] Dial(SIP/101-0017, SIP/102) in new stack == Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5 -- Called SIP/102 -- SIP/102-0018

Re: [asterisk-users] packet2packet bridging

2014-07-09 Thread Sameer Rathod
Hi Ishfaq, I am getting the the flow as attached Could you please read and check if the rtp is passing directly as I am new and dont know much about this all On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Ishfaq Malik i...@pack-net.co.uk wrote: use tcpdump on the server to see if the RTP traffic is passing

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk in debian Wheezy 1.8.13.1 vs. Squeeze 1.8.23.1

2014-07-09 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 10:05:44PM +0200, Thomas wrote: Hello, in Squeeze Asterisk 1.8.23.1 is installed, Self-installed in Wheezy older version 1.8.13.1~dfsg1-3+deb7u3. From a package. With version 1.8.13.1 I have some problems so I would like to install version 1.8.23.1 used in

Re: [asterisk-users] packet2packet bridging

2014-07-09 Thread Matthew Jordan
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Sameer Rathod sam...@hostnsoft.com wrote: Hi, Please clear me on this topic I am confused My log show switching to native rtp. Did this line means that the audio is not coming to the asterisk server any more and asterisk only send the re- invite packet to

Re: [asterisk-users] switching from simple_bridge technology to native_rtp issue

2014-07-09 Thread Matthew Jordan
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:56 AM, Sameer Rathod sam...@hostnsoft.com wrote: Hi, with canreinvite=no and directmedia=no I and getting the message in the logs for all calls switching from simple_bridge technology to native_rtp -- Executing [102@mkg:1] Dial(SIP/101-0017, SIP/102) in new

[asterisk-users] How to monitor non-SNMP SIP devices ?

2014-07-09 Thread Olivier
Hi, I'm seeing a trend in which SIP devices such as Yealink SIP phones (with v72 firmware), are dropping support of SNMP in favor of HTTP eventing if may call this as such : when configuring the SIP device, you can define a couple of HTTP URL which triggered when some event occur (end of boot, on

Re: [asterisk-users] How to monitor non-SNMP SIP devices ?

2014-07-09 Thread Kevin Larsen
asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com wrote on 07/09/2014 10:19:11 AM: From: Olivier oza.4...@gmail.com To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com, Date: 07/09/2014 10:19 AM Subject: [asterisk-users] How to monitor non-SNMP SIP devices ?

Re: [asterisk-users] How to monitor non-SNMP SIP devices ?

2014-07-09 Thread Ishfaq Malik
On 9 July 2014 16:19, Olivier oza.4...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm seeing a trend in which SIP devices such as Yealink SIP phones (with v72 firmware), are dropping support of SNMP in favor of HTTP eventing if may call this as such : when configuring the SIP device, you can define a couple of

[asterisk-users] PRI congestion instead of busy

2014-07-09 Thread Justin Killen
I have two servers, each connected to the PTSN via PRI. When I call from site A (951-999-) to site B (555-1212) and the phone at site B is on the phone, I hear the normal ring tone for about 20 seconds, then the message all circuits are busy now. please try your call again latter followed

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI congestion instead of busy

2014-07-09 Thread Eric Wieling
If you use Playtones you should put an Answer and a Wait(1) before the Playtones I recommend using the Hangup app instead. Busy would be Hangup(17). From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Justin Killen Sent: Wednesday, July

Re: [asterisk-users] How to monitor non-SNMP SIP devices ?

2014-07-09 Thread Sander Smeenk
Quoting Ishfaq Malik (i...@pack-net.co.uk): On 9 July 2014 16:19, Olivier oza.4...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm seeing a trend in which SIP devices such as Yealink SIP phones (with v72 firmware), are dropping support of SNMP in favor of HTTP eventing How do deal with those devices ? If

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI congestion instead of busy

2014-07-09 Thread Justin Killen
I tried changing the dialplan to use Hangup(17) instead of Playback/Busy. Now instead of ringing for 20 seconds and then getting the all circuits are busy now, I get all circuits are busy now immediately. New snippet from site A: ... [2014-07-09 10:53:43] VERBOSE[23020][C-db0d] app_dial.c:

[asterisk-users] Pickup problem

2014-07-09 Thread Massimo Nuvoli
I found a very strange proble whit two asterisk servers in the same network. Scenario Asterisk A with extensions 5XX Asterisk B with extensions 2XX There is NO link between the two asterisks. Call from 501 to 503, 503 ringing Call from 201 to 203, 203 ringing The 202 extension comand a

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI congestion instead of busy

2014-07-09 Thread Justin Killen
I figured it out - the busy tone was being generated by the local end. It seems that upon receiving a hangup, freepbx tries the next trunk. In this case there isn't any other trunk, so I get all circuits are busy now. For anyone interested, the site B playback()/busy() condition has been

[asterisk-users] How to know if the current call has been answer()'ed

2014-07-09 Thread Justin Killen
Is there a channel variable / status indicator / function that indicates if the current channel has been answer()'ed? -Justin -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us

Re: [asterisk-users] How to know if the current call has been answer()'ed

2014-07-09 Thread Joshua Colp
Justin Killen wrote: Is there a channel variable / status indicator / function that indicates if the current channel has been answer()’ed? ${CHANNEL(state)} will return the state the channel is currently in. If the channel is answered the state will be Up. Cheers, -- Joshua Colp Digium,

[asterisk-users] busy() not setting PRI_CAUSE

2014-07-09 Thread Justin Killen
Okay, I think I need a sanity check here - If I call a person that's on the phone, I should get a busy signal. Now more specifically, a call comes into the pbx via PRI. The destination dialplan runs busy(20). Now, the PRI causecode should get set to 17 (user busy) so that the originating end

Re: [asterisk-users] busy() not setting PRI_CAUSE

2014-07-09 Thread Eric Wieling
Generally if you want to send a cause 17 to the caller you would use Hangup(17) and let the caller's switch generate the busy tone. If the dialplan has already answered the call, then you might want to use Busy or Playtones. From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com

Re: [asterisk-users] busy() not setting PRI_CAUSE

2014-07-09 Thread Justin Killen
The description of busy() in the asterisk documentation wiki states: This application will indicate the busy condition to the calling channel. Wouldn't 'indicate the busy condition' on a PRI channel imply setting cause 17? -Justin From:

[asterisk-users] PJSIP Transfer not working

2014-07-09 Thread CDR
I tried to do what I with regular SIP to Transfer a call via 302 Redirect. In asterisk 12 we need to add the Tech, or not, but in any case, there is no transfer done. The call is closed. Here is a trace. How do I do this? [Jul 9 21:39:29] DEBUG[47716][C-0002]: pbx.c:4869