Re: [asterisk-users] working example of t38 fax w/ 1.6.2?

2010-05-06 Thread Ilmars Knipšis
Hello! I use similar setup. Probably you need Answer() in receiving end. And wait(3) before receiving fax. T.38 works fine with 1.6.2. Ilmars. On 2010.05.05. 0:17, sean darcy wrote: On 5/4/2010 7:32 AM, Miguel Amez wrote: App_fax? I didn't hear about that. What's that? Could you please

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Query

2010-05-06 Thread garge rama
Hi Juan, Thanks for your inputs, I tried with changes you suggested and find my observation. After adding context and extension able to make an outgoing call [Digium-fxs to X-lite2000]. But not able to make incoming call [X-lite2000 to Digium-fxs]. Call failed with, (1) “*Call

Re: [asterisk-users] problem with ringinuse=no, queue members receive randomly two calls

2010-05-06 Thread nik600
i get may debug messages like this: DEBUG[30684] channel.c: Internal timing is disabled (option_internal_timing=0 chan-timingfd=-1) Is because dahdi is not installed? Can this be a possible cause of this behaviour? On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 9:54 PM, nik600 nik...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all on

Re: [asterisk-users] CDR to MS-SQL via ODBC issue

2010-05-06 Thread Leif Madsen
Tilghman Lesher wrote: Okay, second idea is that you should very carefully examine your CDR table layout and ensure that the columns that you have match EXACTLY what the module expects you to have. If Asterisk expects you to have a column that you don't (or the column type is wrong), that is

[asterisk-users] Make the call finish after executing Dial(G())

2010-05-06 Thread Motiejus Jakštys
Dear List, My Dial command: exten = _X.,n,Dial(SIP/PBX2/1234,60,G(connect-jack^${EXTEN}^1)) exten = h,1, [connect-jack] exten = _X.,1,NoOp(${CHANNEL}) ; Leg A exten = _X.,2,NoOp(${CHANNEL}) ; Leg B The problem is: after answering, [connect-jack] both priorities are executed, and right

[asterisk-users] problem with trustrpid

2010-05-06 Thread Jesse Cloutier
Hi everyone, I am trying to figure out the behavior of trustrpid Basically its not behaving the way I expected it to or maybe I am missing a configuration option or something else. When a call from a phone is sent to the * box it has the following sip headers: From: From Phone

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-06 Thread Sebastian Milioto
Ok..So what ip phone model do NAT? Sebastian On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Luki lugos...@gmail.com wrote: However, when I connect a PC to that port, SPA922 works as bridge. Exactly. The SPA9x2 has a 2-port switch; no NAT, no routing (unlike the SPA2102, etc). I think the 5.1 series

Re: [asterisk-users] Make the call finish after executing Dial(G())

2010-05-06 Thread Philipp von Klitzing
Hi! [connect-jack] exten = _X.,1,NoOp(${CHANNEL}) ; Leg A exten = _X.,2,NoOp(${CHANNEL}) ; Leg B The problem is: after answering, [connect-jack] both priorities are executed, and right after executing them call drops. The call legs drop because you do not do anything with them, since your

[asterisk-users] REALTIME in 1.2

2010-05-06 Thread Jason Walker
I am trying to change a 1.6 realtime statement into a 1.2 realtime statement and I know much has changed. I wish I could just upgrade, but alas not right now. exten =x,n,Set(NULL1=${REALTIME(schedules,id,${SCHEDULE})}) comes back with pbx.c:1371 ast_func_read: Function REALTIME not

Re: [asterisk-users] Make the call finish after executing Dial(G())

2010-05-06 Thread Motiejus Jakštys
Hi, Great! I thought I won't see leg B channel while using M(), but I do! :) M() did my day. Thanks. On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Philipp von Klitzing klitz...@pool.informatik.rwth-aachen.de wrote: Hi! [connect-jack] exten = _X.,1,NoOp(${CHANNEL}) ; Leg A exten = _X.,2,NoOp(${CHANNEL})

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-06 Thread Steve Howes
On 6 May 2010, at 14:16, Sebastian Milioto wrote: Ok..So what ip phone model do NAT? I think you'd struggle to find one. If it's a requirement you're probably doing something wrong... S -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Query

2010-05-06 Thread Noah Miller
Hi Garge - exten = ,1,Asterisk_Application(Action) ;Dial(Zap/1/${Phone_Number_you want}) Two things: 1. There is no such thing as Zap anymore. Zap has been renamed to Dahdi because of a trademark issue. So your extension should look like: exten = ,Dial(Dahdi/1/) 2. Do you

Re: [asterisk-users] VoIP Termination in Japan

2010-05-06 Thread Andy Kuo
On 5/5/10, Adrian Marsh adrian.ma...@ubiquisys.com wrote: Anyone have any experience with a Japanese local VoIP termination supplier? I've emailed a few companies looking to setup some PSTN to SIP and SIP to PSTN termination, but no luck so far. Thanks, Adrian -- Sent from my

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-06 Thread Noah Miller
Ok..So what ip phone model do NAT? I think you'd struggle to find one. If it's a requirement you're probably doing something wrong... Definitely get a router. Plug the IP phone into the router, and then you can plug the computer into the phone or the router. - Noah --

Re: [asterisk-users] AMR codec for Asterisk 1.6.1.X

2010-05-06 Thread Andrea Cristofanini
Dear list, i have re-compiled again the source code of amr patch for 1.6 (https://asteriskvideo.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/asteriskvideo/amr/asterisk-1.6-AMR.patch) The patch does not compile with the static function into frame.c called : static int amr_samples(unsigned char *data, int datalen)

Re: [asterisk-users] VoIP Termination in Japan

2010-05-06 Thread Andy Kuo
On 5/5/10, Adrian Marsh adrian.ma...@ubiquisys.com wrote: Anyone have any experience with a Japanese local VoIP termination supplier? I've emailed a few companies looking to setup some PSTN to SIP and SIP to PSTN termination, but no luck so far. Thanks, Adrian -- Sent from my

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-06 Thread Sebastian Milioto
It is a building, with 24 separated rooms, each room will have a PC and a IP Phone. Every room connected to a switch Cisco 2950. I want keeping all PCs isolated behind a NAT (no access to neighbour's PC), and still keep communication in same LAN between all IP Phones. Should I take another

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX2 Auto-congesting call due to slow response

2010-05-06 Thread Alexandre Rodrigues
Hi all, I have been testing several asterisk versions and I found out that all the previus version of asterisk worked fine. After 1.4.22 it cease to work. In the change log referring to iax from 1.4.22 to 1.4.23 I found this:

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-06 Thread Jeff LaCoursiere
On Thu, 6 May 2010, Sebastian Milioto wrote: It is a building, with 24 separated rooms, each room will have a PC and a IP Phone. Every room connected to a switch Cisco 2950. I want keeping all PCs isolated behind a NAT (no access to neighbour's PC), and still keep communication in same LAN

Re: [asterisk-users] What is billsec in CDR?

2010-05-06 Thread Jian Gao
Philipp von Klitzing wrote: Hi! apps like playback do an implicit answer and this fires up the billsec counter. OK, here is my dialplan: exten = _011X.,n,Playback(this-call-will-end-in) exten = _011X.,n,Dial(SIP/${ext...@${ldtrunk1},60,L(${ms}:3)) Is there any way

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6.2.7 Now Available

2010-05-06 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
On 05/04/2010 07:41 PM, Leif Madsen wrote: OK, I got sufficiently curious to make sure Skype for Asterisk still loaded on 1.6.2.7. It does for me, but I had to run make install in my Skype source directory. One of the modules loaded, but the 'skype' CLI command was not available until

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-06 Thread Noah Miller
It is a building, with 24 separated rooms, each room will have a PC and a IP Phone. Every room connected to a switch Cisco 2950. I want keeping all PCs isolated behind a NAT (no access to neighbour's PC), and still keep communication in same LAN between all IP Phones. Should I take another

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-06 Thread Sebastian Milioto
I see the following in SPA922 System tab (new firmware) VLAN Settings Enable VLAN:yesnoEnable CDP:yesno VLAN ID:PC Port VLAN Highest Priority:01234567No Limit Enable PC Port VLAN Tagging:yesnoPC Port VLAN ID: VLAN ID:1 for all Phones, and VLAN 2, 3, 4, 5..,24 for each PC. This should work,

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-06 Thread David White
-Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com on behalf of Noah Miller Sent: Thu 5/6/2010 10:41 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922 It is a building, with 24 separated rooms, each room will

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-06 Thread Jeff LaCoursiere
On Thu, 6 May 2010, Sebastian Milioto wrote: I see the following in SPA922 System tab (new firmware) VLAN Settings Enable VLAN:yesnoEnable CDP:yesno VLAN ID:PC Port VLAN Highest Priority:01234567No Limit Enable PC Port VLAN Tagging:yesnoPC Port VLAN ID: VLAN ID:1 for all Phones, and VLAN

Re: [asterisk-users] long return times from System() calls with 1.6.2.6?

2010-05-06 Thread David Backeberg
In case anybody was following this thread, wanted to let people know that the fix made it into SVN, and is packaged into 1.6.2.8-rc1 Huge thanks to Kevin and Tilghman On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:40 PM, David Backeberg dbackeb...@gmail.com wrote: issue opened.

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-06 Thread Philipp von Klitzing
Hi! Should I take another approach on that? Put each PC in its own VLAN. Keep all the phones in one VLAN. Note: VLANs are an organisational tool, and do not really add security. If you want to go with VLANs in thise case then rather consider port based VLAN (configured in the switch

[asterisk-users] Questions About Fax for Asterisk

2010-05-06 Thread Steve Totaro
Yes, I purchased licenses for Fax for Asterisk and yes I called tech support and had the WORST experience I have ever had with any technical support call. I am running Asterisk 1.6.2.6 and: FAX For Asterisk Components: Applications: 1.6.2.0_1.2.0 voipgw01Digium FAX Driver: 1.6.2.0_1.2.0

[asterisk-users] Possible bug in chan_sip:add_sdp

2010-05-06 Thread Richard Kenner
Am I missing something here? I see if (needvideo) { /* only if video response is appropriate */ add_line(resp, m_video-str); add_line(resp, a_video-str); add_line(resp, hold); /* Repeat hold for the video stream */ } else if

Re: [asterisk-users] Possible bug in chan_sip:add_sdp

2010-05-06 Thread Richard Kenner
I can confirm that the following fixes my problem: --- chan_sip.c (revision 261450) +++ chan_sip.c (working copy) @@ -10357,12 +10357,22 @@ strlen(connection) + strlen(session_time); if (needaudio) len += m_audio-used + a_audio-used + strlen(hold); +

Re: [asterisk-users] CDR to MS-SQL via ODBC issue

2010-05-06 Thread Neeraj Chand
On Wednesday 05 May 2010 18:29:26 Neeraj Chand wrote: --- Message: 10 Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 10:26:34 -0500 From: Tilghman Lesher tles...@digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] CDR to MS-SQL via ODBC issue To:

[asterisk-users] T.38 Fax With Flowroute SIP Provider

2010-05-06 Thread Ryan Wagoner
Does anybody have T.38 faxing working with Flowroute? I am running Asterisk 1.6.2.7-rc3 with spandsp 0.0.6-pre17. I can successfully receive faxes over ulaw. I enabled T.38 with t38pt_udptl=yes in sip.conf. When I receive a fax it tries to negotiate T.38 and Flowroute sends back a Bad Request

Re: [asterisk-users] T.38 Fax With Flowroute SIP Provider

2010-05-06 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
On 05/06/2010 05:46 PM, Ryan Wagoner wrote: Does anybody have T.38 faxing working with Flowroute? I am running Asterisk 1.6.2.7-rc3 with spandsp 0.0.6-pre17. I can successfully receive faxes over ulaw. I enabled T.38 with t38pt_udptl=yes in sip.conf. When I receive a fax it tries to negotiate

Re: [asterisk-users] T.38 Fax With Flowroute SIP Provider

2010-05-06 Thread Warren Selby
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.comwrote: On 05/06/2010 05:46 PM, Ryan Wagoner wrote: Does anybody have T.38 faxing working with Flowroute? I am running Asterisk 1.6.2.7-rc3 with spandsp 0.0.6-pre17. I can successfully receive faxes over ulaw. I enabled

Re: [asterisk-users] T.38 Fax With Flowroute SIP Provider

2010-05-06 Thread Ryan Wagoner
I wasn't sure how the lines were counted. Here is the debug output from Asterisk where it is building the invite packet. I looked at the a=T38 lines and nothing is standing out to me. Ryan [May 6 13:29:05] DEBUG[32389] chan_sip.c: Header 0 [ 47]: INVITE sip:+num...@x.x.x.x:5060 SIP/2.0 [May

[asterisk-users] Contact header gets url decoded?

2010-05-06 Thread Tom Browning
I'm migrating an application running on a fairly old 1.4 (or 1.2?) version of Asterisk to some boxes running 1.6.0.27 The application takes an inbound INVITE like: mumble-fratz-sip%3afoo%40bar@asteriskbox.abc.com:5062 The older version of asterisk replies with a 200 OK and a Contact: header

Re: [asterisk-users] Channels In Use

2010-05-06 Thread dotnetdub
Hi Luki, Thank you so much.. The soft xx worked perfectly. The rtptimeout is excellent also. Regards, S. On 5 May 2010 23:59, Luki lugos...@gmail.com wrote: Are there any CLI commands to free this up or any other ways without having to restart asterisk. Did you try soft hangup channel?

Re: [asterisk-users] T.38 Fax With Flowroute SIP Provider

2010-05-06 Thread Ryan Wagoner
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Warren Selby wcse...@selbytech.com wrote: On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com wrote: On 05/06/2010 05:46 PM, Ryan Wagoner wrote: Does anybody have T.38 faxing working with Flowroute? I am running Asterisk 1.6.2.7-rc3 with

[asterisk-users] problem with trustrpid

2010-05-06 Thread crjw
I am trying to figure out the behavior of trustrpid Basically its not behaving the way I expected it to or maybe I am missing a configuration option or something else. When a call from a phone is sent to the * box it has the following sip headers: From: From Phone sip:1001 at

Re: [asterisk-users] problem with trustrpid

2010-05-06 Thread Dan Moschuk
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 02:20:24AM +, crjw wrote: | I am trying to figure out the behavior of trustrpid | | Basically its not behaving the way I expected it to or maybe I am | missing a configuration option or something else. | | I had a similar situation in which playing with trustrpid

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-06 Thread Vineet Bhojnagarwala
I think this is a motel kind of situation and a PVLAN serves the situation right. Put all the ipphones in the voice vlan as suggested, make a seperate isolated vlan for the PCs, this will restrict traffic between the clients. Rgds, Vineet Bhojnagarwala RCDD, NTS, OSP Spear Networks Pvt

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-06 Thread Vineet Bhojnagarwala
Alternatively, if using normal vlans, this can also be achieved by enabling access list on the switch and restrict traffic flows. Generally this is done on a layer 3 switch, don't think it will support on your switch model. Rgds, Vineet Bhojnagarwala RCDD, NTS, OSP Spear Networks Pvt Ltd

[asterisk-users] Problem of Playing 'pbx-transfer'

2010-05-06 Thread kamrun nahar bina
Dear all, We have been using asterisk for 4 years. Now we have got problems which occurs during the attended transfer. During attended transfer, sometimes we cannot hear the sound of 'pbx-transfer'. I cannot understand why this is happening? log is : -- Started music on hold, class 'default',

[asterisk-users] Video in Skype for Asterisk

2010-05-06 Thread Richard Kenner
Is there anything special that has to be done to make video calls work? It doesn't seem to work for me (no video). What CODECS are supported? -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to