[asterisk-users] RPM updates

2013-01-28 Thread Steven Howes
Hi All,

Who do I need to poke to get the yum repository / RPM files updated? The dahdi 
RPMs are not up to date with the CentOS kernel versions any more, it's making 
doing an installation a bit tricky due to dependancies, I'd rather not roll 
back / remove new kernels if I don't have to..

Cheers

Steve
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] RPM updates

2013-01-28 Thread Anthony Messina
On Monday, January 28, 2013 01:55:09 PM Steven Howes wrote:
 Who do I need to poke to get the yum repository / RPM files updated? The
 dahdi RPMs are not up to date with the CentOS kernel versions any more,
 it's making doing an installation a bit tricky due to dependancies, I'd
 rather not roll back / remove new kernels if I don't have to..

I'm not sure which CentOs you're using, but I' build them for CentOS/EL 6:

See http://messinet.com/rpms/

Of course, if you're looking for the latest possible build, it might take me a 
few days: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpm-4.10.2-2.fc18

As a side note, I've been working out how to move forward with kernel module 
signing in Koji, as I've upgraded to Fedora 18.  So far, the prospects for 
signed kernel modules are looking good.  Though I wish Digium would just get 
DAHDI into the upstream kernel already :/

-A

-- 
Anthony - http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery
8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] RPM updates

2013-01-28 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 01:55:09PM +, Steven Howes wrote:
 Hi All,
 
 Who do I need to poke to get the yum repository / RPM files updated? The 
 dahdi RPMs are not up to date with the CentOS kernel versions any more, it's 
 making doing an installation a bit tricky due to dependancies, I'd rather not 
 roll back / remove new kernels if I don't have to..

See also:

  http://git.tzafrir.org.il/?p=rpm/dahdi-linux.git;a=summary
  http://git.tzafrir.org.il/?p=rpm/dahdi-tools.git;a=summary

Sadly I don't yet have the packages built from them available.

-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755  jabber:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
+972-50-7952406   mailto:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:gu...@local.xorcom.com/tzafrir

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Configuration Required for Remove Queue Member

2013-01-28 Thread Ahmed Munir
I would like to know, is there a method in which  we can define the timeout
value for a member who already login to the queue but after quite a while
if he didn't answer the 3-4 calls (not going to member pause queue) but
automatically remove the member from the queue?

Please advise.

-- 
Regards,

Ahmed Munir Chohan
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 11- Answer with [m=image 0 udptl t38] and Call Drop

2013-01-28 Thread Matthew Jordan
On 01/26/2013 07:26 AM, Andreas Sikkema wrote:
 On 1/18/13 13:24 , Matthew Jordan wrote:
 1) Contact your carrier and ask why they are rejecting the 200 OK.

 2) Assuming they won't change their behaviour, find out what they want
 in a response that declines an image media format. Without knowing what
 your carrier thinks the SDP should look like, any modifications you make
 to Asterisk will be guesses.
 
 
 I ran into a similar problem this week. There's a number of SIP
 implementations (either legacy or not good enough) that don't handle a
 zero port denial of a media stream quite right.
 
 In the past these implementations would have worked fine when the called
 party would have just ignored the offending media stream, instead of
 sending an explicit deny.
 

A part of me wonders is if you're really running into the issue
described on ASTERISK-20908 [1]. Do you mind trying the patch on there
to see if it helps?

If it does, then the culprit isn't the 0 port but the lack of a
terminating '\r\n' on the offer.

[1] https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-20908

-- 
Matthew Jordan
Digium, Inc. | Engineering Manager
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: http://digium.com  http://asterisk.org



--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 11- Answer with [m=image 0 udptl t38] and Call Drop

2013-01-28 Thread Andreas Sikkema
Matthew,

 A part of me wonders is if you're really running into the issue
 described on ASTERISK-20908 [1]. Do you mind trying the patch on there
 to see if it helps?

The problem is that some customers of mine (erm ours) who are running an
Asterisk based sot PBX are having some issues that are remarkably
similar to what is described here. I can unfortunately only confirm that
not every SIP client handles a null port reply or a 488 Not Acceptable
Here message as we would normally expect.

It's a complicated scenario involving a large carrier with legacy
hardware that I don't have access to to do a quick test :-(

-- 
Andreas Sikkema

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users