Re: [asterisk-users] SDP Issue

2012-01-24 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
LOL :) that really made me chuckle this morning; and very apt for the fact I did not post any fundamental details about the issue. All points duly noted! -- Thanks, Phil - Original Message - Is --[ UxBoD ]-- a first-person shooter gang--er, clan--name? Like, one of those who rocket

[asterisk-users] SDP Issue

2012-01-23 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Hi, I am attempting to make a SIP call between an Asterisk 10 server and an Asterisk 1.8 system but when it goes to VM and the first prompt plays the line drops and I see on the V10 console: [Jan 23 15:47:04] WARNING[7859]: chan_sip.c:8944 process_sdp: Insufficient information for SDP (m=

Re: [asterisk-users] SDP Issue

2012-01-23 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Hi Kevin, will grab a sip trace today and post it up. -- Thanks, Phil - Original Message - On 01/23/2012 09:48 AM, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote: Hi, I am attempting to make a SIP call between an Asterisk 10 server and an Asterisk 1.8 system but when it goes to VM and the first prompt

Re: [asterisk-users] Voicemail weirdness after upgrade

2012-01-19 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
If in a multi-tenant environment be aware of https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-17198 as VMs cannot be forwarded :( -- Thanks, Phil - Original Message - Paul Schenkeveld wrote: exten = 5551234,n,Voicemail(1234,su) I'm still running 1.4 (slowly configuring a 10

[asterisk-users] IAX2 woes

2011-12-29 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Hello all, I attempted to make a couple of outbound calls this morning and always got the busy tone. I checked the Asterisk console and was greeted with: [Dec 29 11:29:22] WARNING[12039]: app_dial.c:2218 dial_exec_full: Unable to create channel of type 'IAX2' (cause 20 - Unknown) ==

[asterisk-users] AMI and Dialplan

2011-12-19 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Hello all, This may sound an odd question but if you initiate a call using AMI does it adhere to what has been defined in the dial plan or do we have to write the logic into the AMI call ? -- Thanks, Phil -- _ --

Re: [asterisk-users] AMI and Dialplan

2011-12-19 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Please ignore as this was a user error! -- Thanks, Phil - Original Message - Hello all, This may sound an odd question but if you initiate a call using AMI does it adhere to what has been defined in the dial plan or do we have to write the logic into the AMI call ? -- Thanks,

Re: [asterisk-users] VoiceMail and IMAP

2011-12-14 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
quotes. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of --[ UxBoD ]-- Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 11:12 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] VoiceMail and IMAP

2011-12-12 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Hello all, I have recently upgraded to version 1.8.7.2 and have started to see the following errors in the logs: [ Dec 12 16:10:38] ERROR[10223] app_voicemail.c: IMAP Error: SELECT failed [ Dec 12 16:10:38] ERROR[10223] app_voicemail.c: IMAP Error: must be in SELECTED state They are not

Re: [asterisk-users] VoiceMail and IMAP

2011-12-12 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
1.8.7.0 ... am using Zimbra as the backend IMAP storage. -- Thanks, Phil - Original Message - On 11-12-12 11:36 AM, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote: Hello all, I have recently upgraded to version 1.8.7.2 and have started to see the following errors in the logs: From what version

Re: [asterisk-users] VoiceMail and IMAP

2011-12-12 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
as the backend IMAP storage. -- Thanks, Phil - Original Message - On 11-12-12 11:36 AM, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote: Hello all, I have recently upgraded to version 1.8.7.2 and have started to see the following errors in the logs: From what version? -- Paul Belanger

Re: [asterisk-users] VoiceMail and IMAP

2011-12-12 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of --[ UxBoD ]-- Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 11:12 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] VoiceMail and IMAP Hmmm, just tried leaving a voicemail on a new mailbox where the imapfolder

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 10.0.0-rc1 Now Available

2011-11-10 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Could we have more hours in the day to play with all the goodiness ? cannot keep up with everything at the moment :) -- Thanks, Phil - Original Message - I know what you mean - I'd rather have a working x-beta1 that a failing x.0 -Original Message- From:

[asterisk-users] [OT] Yealink T26/28/38 and Open-VPN

2011-08-24 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Hi, Sorry for an OT post but striking out a bit at the moment trying to get a response from Yealink RD. Has anybody successfully managed to get a Yealink phone to work across Open-VPN when using tlsauth ? We really do hope that it is possible due to the benefits tlsauth offers against DoS.

Re: [asterisk-users] Trouble with *8 Pickup

2011-08-11 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Ah, now this is interesting as one of our clients had the same problem the other day; in our case when they performed the *8 they got an extension unavailable from a completely different dialplan! This was on Asterisk 1.6 though with Snom phones. -- Thanks, Phil - Original Message -

Re: [asterisk-users] CEL and MySQL

2011-08-08 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
cel_odbc.conf and then use adapative odbc I think. -- Thanks, Phil - Original Message - Is anyone using CEL with a MySQL backed at all? I've found a table schema but I'm guessing I need some sort of cel_mysql.conf and don't even have a sample for that. Can anyone give me any

[asterisk-users] X86_64 Compilation Issue

2011-07-29 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Hi, compiling up a new installation of Asterisk 1.8.5 on CentOS 6 X86_64 and am seeing the following when running the make: /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libpam.so when searching for -lpam /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libssl.so when searching for -lssl

Re: [asterisk-users] X86_64 Compilation Issue

2011-07-29 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Thank you Dave. -- Thanks, Phil - Original Message - On 07/29/2011 06:56 AM, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote: Hi, compiling up a new installation of Asterisk 1.8.5 on CentOS 6 X86_64 and am seeing the following when running the make: /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib

Re: [asterisk-users] Securing Asterisk

2011-07-27 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Simple answer to all this is to install http://lync.microsoft.com/ ... good luck ;) -- Thanks, Phil - Original Message - Kevin P. Fleming wrote: 'alwaysauthreject' in not imcompliant with any RFCs; the RFCs define response codes that *can* be used to indicate (for example)

Re: [asterisk-users] Securing Asterisk

2011-07-26 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
That is pretty interesting. I am writing a similar tool but using OSSEC to identify the attacks and then share the data between nodes using Memcached and AnyEvent. Both Asterisk and Apache, or any other server that can run OSSEC, will be able to feed into the shared ban database. -- Thanks,

Re: [asterisk-users] Functions not autoloading

2011-07-26 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote: Since upgrading to 1.8.5.0 I have had to add into modules.conf: load = func_callerid.so load = func_cdr.so otherwise they do not get loaded even though I have set autoload=yes. Is this something you would expect as it is different behavior

Re: [asterisk-users] file2ban

2011-07-26 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
If you are using OSSEC here are some rules: rule id=1 level=5 decoded_aslocal-asterisk-denied/decoded_as descriptionAsterisk Potentially Under Attack/description /rule rule id=10001 level=8 frequency=5 timeframe=10 if_matched_sid1/if_matched_sid same_source_ip /

Re: [asterisk-users] Functions not autoloading

2011-07-22 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
/asterisk/modules. How could I help to debug this please ? -- Thanks, Phil - Original Message - On 07/21/2011 04:31 AM, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote: Since upgrading to 1.8.5.0 I have had to add into modules.conf: load = func_callerid.so load = func_cdr.so otherwise

[asterisk-users] Functions not autoloading

2011-07-21 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Since upgrading to 1.8.5.0 I have had to add into modules.conf: load = func_callerid.so load = func_cdr.so otherwise they do not get loaded even though I have set autoload=yes. Is this something you would expect as it is different behavior to 1.8.3.0 and I do not see any issues in

Re: [asterisk-users] Functions not autoloading

2011-07-21 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - On 07/21/2011 04:31 AM, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote: Since upgrading to 1.8.5.0 I have had to add into modules.conf: load = func_callerid.so load = func_cdr.so otherwise they do not get loaded even though I have set autoload=yes. Is this something you would expect

[asterisk-users] Converged phones; akin to SwitchVox ?

2011-07-19 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Been looking at SwitchVox and how it handles mobility using virtual extensions. Does somebody have any examples on how this can be achieved with Asterisk ? I have Bria on my Android and it would be nice if I could get my office phone and/or cell to ring. -- Thanks, Phil --

Re: [asterisk-users] Macro issue under 1.8.5

2011-07-18 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 11:01:07 +0100 (BST) --[ UxBoD ]-- ux...@splatnix.net wrote: - Original Message - On 11-07-15 02:18 PM, Doug Lytle wrote: --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote: I back leveled to 1.8.3 and that works fine. What am I missing

Re: [asterisk-users] Macro issue under 1.8.5

2011-07-18 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - - Original Message - On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 11:01:07 +0100 (BST) --[ UxBoD ]-- ux...@splatnix.net wrote: - Original Message - On 11-07-15 02:18 PM, Doug Lytle wrote: --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote: I back leveled to 1.8.3 and that works fine

[asterisk-users] chan_gtalk load error

2011-07-18 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Hi, When starting Asterisk (1.8.5.0) I see in messages: [Jul 18 15:47:50] WARNING[15491] loader.c: Error loading module 'chan_gtalk.so': /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_gtalk.so: undefined symbol: ast_aji_get_client [Jul 18 15:47:50] WARNING[15491] loader.c: Module 'chan_gtalk.so' could not be

Re: [asterisk-users] chan_gtalk load error

2011-07-18 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - - Original Message - From: --[ UxBoD ]-- ux...@splatnix.net To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 11:42:25 AM Subject: [asterisk-users] chan_gtalk load error Hi

Re: [asterisk-users] Macro issue under 1.8.5

2011-07-16 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - On 11-07-15 02:18 PM, Doug Lytle wrote: --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote: I back leveled to 1.8.3 and that works fine. What am I missing as app_macro has been installed okay? Macro was depreciated in 1.6 and most likely removed in 1.8.5 Removed, no. However in future

[asterisk-users] Macro issue under 1.8.5

2011-07-15 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Have just tried to test an upgrade to 1.8.5 and when making an outbound call I get: [Jul 15 18:48:52] WARNING[21038]: pbx.c:4071 pbx_extension_helper: No application 'Macro' for extension (context, XX, 1) I back leveled to 1.8.3 and that works fine. What am I missing as app_macro has

[asterisk-users] Next Asterisk 1.8 Release

2011-06-17 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Hi, When is the next release planned for as very keen to get it into Production but require the call pickup fix. -- Thanks, Phil -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join

[asterisk-users] Unusual message

2011-05-13 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Hi, Needed to test follow-me this evening on Asterisk 1.6.2.17 and received the following message: == Spawn extension (international-US, 0114407590XX, 5) exited non-zero on 'Local /0114407590XX@aXX-a62a;2' -- no live channels left. exiting. I have not seen that before. What does

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.8 latest branch safe for production ?

2011-05-09 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 20:21 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote: Are you not seeing issues with *8 call pick up then ? Nope, I double checked it after seeing someone saying they had issues with it and it is fine on the installation I have. Which release are you

Re: [asterisk-users] Configuring Voicemail in Asterisk 1.8

2011-05-07 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - Dear; Where I can find a new documentation for Asterisk 1.8? Where is the wrong in that line? I see it is as 1.8 version ! 500 = 1234,Operator,opera...@gama.com Regards Bilal --- You are using an old format for specifying the

[asterisk-users] [SOT] Virtualising Asterisk

2011-05-07 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
I know a lot has changed over the past couple of years, and even monthly, and that Asterisk running within a virtualised environment is very happy indeed. If one would only be using SIP/IAX would Xen/KVM be the best solution ? / or perhaps VServer/LXC maybe advantageous due to binary hashing.

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.8 latest branch safe for production ?

2011-05-06 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 14:13 +, satish patel wrote: Hi All, Just wondering is it safe to use asterisk 1.8 latest branch on production ? http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk/branches/1.8/ Revision 317100 -S We've been running 1.8.3.2 with

Re: [asterisk-users] [OT] Yealink Phones

2011-04-13 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - I've just started deploying these (well the T28P model) after years of Snom issues and they look pretty good (although the documentation is execrable; if you thought the Snom stuff was obtuse Yealink have got them knocked into a cocked hat!). Anyway, for

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.8.3

2011-04-07 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - On 11-04-07 08:20 AM, Satish Patel wrote: Is it ture 1.8.3 is unstable? We are planning to put this in production. Please suggest me what should I do? This is a loaded question, since it really depends on what you plan to do. What does your migration plan

Re: [asterisk-users] problem with crashing Asterisk 1.8

2011-03-10 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - My Asterisk 1.8 (with Dahdi/Wanrouter) is crashing every minute or 2. It just keeps restarting. Any pointers on log files to watch? I tried to debug it but i couldn't find a good reason for the crashes. Maby the box is just overloaded or something like that but

[asterisk-users] Multiple SIP endpoint registrations

2011-03-09 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Hi, With Asterisk 1.8 is it now possible to register the same SIP account at multiple endpoints and for both to ring when the associated extension is dialed ? -- Thanks, Phil -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by

Re: [asterisk-users] doorphone?

2011-03-09 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - Hi, could anybody suggest a usable doorphone and magnetic door opener hardphone system for me, please? Of course should be connectable to asterisk. I am in the EU, should be available here. thank you, Csaba --

[asterisk-users] CEL and PGSQL

2011-02-28 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Hi, Would someone know where I can download the CEL schema for (create commands) for PostgreSQL please ? -- Thanks, Phil -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us

Re: [asterisk-users] CEL and PGSQL

2011-02-28 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - Pretty sure I saw those on wiki.asterisk.org . Thanks, --Warren Selby, dCAP On Feb 28, 2011, at 10:39 AM, --[ UxBoD ]-- ux...@splatnix.net wrote: Hi, Would someone know where I can download the CEL schema for (create commands) for PostgreSQL please

[asterisk-users] SRTP Error Message

2011-02-26 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Apologies in advance if this has come up a thousand times before but is there any way to stop this error in 1.8 ? [ Feb 26 15:09:09] ERROR[6678] chan_sip.c: No SRTP module loaded, can't setup SRTP session. -- Thanks, Phil --

[asterisk-users] [OT] Yealink IP Phones

2011-02-25 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Hello all, After numerous issues with Snom phones (360/370/870) potentially looking to migrate too Yealink as their product range looks very promising indeed. Are any of you using them with Asterisk ? How do they perform ? Do you use mass deployment at all ? Would be very interested to

Re: [asterisk-users] Voicemail email attachment as MP3, with tags containing sender name, number, message number

2011-02-15 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - I found some great pieces of script on the internet that I've combined to allow Asterisk to send voicemails as an MP3 file, and encode the sender name and number as well as message number as tags into the MP3 file. I even include a cover art image which has our

[asterisk-users] app_calendar and SSL

2011-01-17 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Hi, Over the weekend tried to setup a test using the new app_calendar code but receiving the following error: [Jan 17 09:23:35] WARNING[27663]: res_calendar_icalendar.c:146 fetch_icalendar: Unable to retrieve iCalendar 'testcal' from

Re: [asterisk-users] app_calendar and SSL

2011-01-17 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - Try to disable certificate verification on the app. I had never tried it personally but check for that option. Sent from my iPhone On Jan 17, 2011, at 5:51 PM, --[ UxBoD ]-- ux...@splatnix.net wrote: Hi, Over the weekend tried to setup a test using

Re: [asterisk-users] Voicemail Forwarding

2011-01-04 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote: - Original Message - Yes exactly that indeed. Though Asterisk appears to ignore which context the user is in and selects default instead. Beginning to think that it is a bug. I got it figured out. In your voicemail.conf

Re: [asterisk-users] Voicemail Forwarding

2010-12-18 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - Is that user trying to forward to xxx in the same context? On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 5:57 AM, --[ UxBoD ]-- ux...@splatnix.net wrote: Experiencing a problem when users attempt to forward a voicemail from within VoiceMailMain(Option 8) I see the console message

[asterisk-users] Voicemail Forwarding

2010-12-17 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Experiencing a problem when users attempt to forward a voicemail from within VoiceMailMain(Option 8) I see the console message: Couldn't not find mailbox XXX in context default As why are running in a multi-tenant environment voicemail.conf has been separated into individual contexts. The

Re: [asterisk-users] How to find , internal, external inbound or outbound

2010-12-17 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - reply please On 12/17/2010 10:03 AM, Nikhil wrote: Hi Does anyone knows how to find out a call in a asterisk is external incoming ,external out going or internal Thanks Nikhil Perhaps if you were clearer in the question you are asking ? --

Re: [asterisk-users] Attack problem

2010-12-17 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - HI, My system been attacked from someone I guess, kindly check the link below How can I stop the ircd attack http://pastebin.com/tbjh5qzP regards * No employee or agent is authorized to conclude any

[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.8 crashing

2010-11-26 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Hi, Has anybody had 1.8 crashing for no reason at all ? It has happened a couple of times so far and when I check /var/log/asterisk/messages nothing is in there at all :( -- Thanks, Phil -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.8 crashing

2010-11-26 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 8:00 AM, --[ UxBoD ]-- ux...@splatnix.net wrote: Hi, Has anybody had 1.8 crashing for no reason at all ? It has happened a couple of times so far and when I check /var/log/asterisk/messages nothing is in there at all :( -- Thanks

Re: [asterisk-users] astcanary ?

2010-11-24 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - Hello, I notice that the following proces is running : astcanary /var/run/asterisk/alt.asterisk.canary.tweet.tweet.tweet 1527 What is this ?? Kind regards, Jonas. You are running Asterisk with priority set. Check /etc/asterisk/asterisk.conf for the

[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.8 Release Schedule

2010-11-23 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
I have read the wiki entry but unsure when we would likely see a 1.8.0.1 beta or release candidate ? -- Thanks, Phil -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.8 Release Schedule

2010-11-23 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - On 10-11-23 07:31 AM, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote: I have read the wiki entry but unsure when we would likely see a 1.8.0.1 beta or release candidate ? It will be Asterisk 1.8.1-rc1 and that is now available (as of a few minutes ago) http://www.asterisk.org/node

Re: [asterisk-users] URGENT Help needed

2010-11-22 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - Hello, We tried to upgrade our Asterisk from 1.6.2.13 to 1.6.2.14, after trying to install iksemel (jabber support) and spandsp, but now Asterisk doesn't work anymore and we can't get it to run, althorugh we tried to remove it completely and reinstall

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP Extensions and loss of Internet connection

2010-11-22 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - Hi all! A few days I have problems connecting to the Internet on my house and since then my local SIP extensions are no longer registered against the local Asterisk server. I'm using Asterisk 1.4.24.1. I was researching on the Internet and I found that it

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP Extensions and loss of Internet connection

2010-11-22 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - Hi, Phil. A few days I have problems connecting to the Internet on my house and since then my local SIP extensions are no longer registered against the local Asterisk server. I'm using Asterisk 1.4.24.1. I was researching on the Internet and I

[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.8 and Zimbra

2010-11-09 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Has anyone managed to successfully connect Asterisk to Zimbra using the Jabber service ? I have opened http://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18198 as it keeps failing for me. Am wondering whether it is due to using a self signed cert. -- Thanks, Phil --

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP Load Balancing

2010-10-28 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - I have a very simple setup with two SIP routes to my carrier. I need to have every other phone call placed to that carrier go to a different address. This is what I need the call flow to look like. I have spent many hours searching and have not found a working

Re: [asterisk-users] fraud advice (Also advice on using ipbanning)

2010-10-17 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - When we designed our systems on asterisk we designed it to me multi-tenant. Se we use customer prefixes on all extensions. This allows us to have multiple customers using the same extension pools. It also reduces the hack foot print as hackers must know the

[asterisk-users] Phantom phone ringing

2010-10-04 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Hi, Running 1.6.2.11 and getting the odd occation that all phones will start ringing with nobody on the other end. From the information we have received from the client we can see that a call comes in, it is either answered or not answered, but at the same time a second call comes in and it

Re: [asterisk-users] Help me Out!!!!

2010-09-15 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - Rough area. Consider yourself lucky you haven't been ripped apart :P Pete wrote: I hope someone has helped poor Rob, I would as I am just over the bridge in Bristol, UK but some evil internet scammer has stolen all my money! ;) Cheers! On 15/09/10

Re: [asterisk-users] Wanted: UK-specific hardware recommendations (FXOand FXS)

2010-09-04 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - Roger Burton West wrote: I want to hook one of them to the PSTN. Given that I am in the UK, what is a reasonably easily-available device to provide an FXO interface from a Linux box, with a minimum of faffing around with drivers? Just one line is needed,

Re: [asterisk-users] DAHDI not detecting caller hangup

2010-08-24 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:56 AM, --[ UxBoD ]-- ux...@splatnix.net wrote: Odd problem have just noticed in that when I call into the PBX DAHDI detects the call and hands it off to the extension, if I then hang up it still continues to process through

Re: [asterisk-users] DAHDI not detecting caller hangup

2010-08-24 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote: - Original Message - On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:56 AM, --[ UxBoD ]-- ux...@splatnix.net wrote: Odd problem have just noticed in that when I call into the PBX DAHDI detects the call and hands it off

Re: [asterisk-users] All phones ringing when temporary loss of Internet

2010-08-24 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 1:03 PM, --[ UxBoD ]-- ux...@splatnix.net wrote: This is a real strange one and trying to phantom it out. One of our clients is connected to our Asterisk installation, from two sites, via VPN which works great. Every so often one

[asterisk-users] EMail on Missed Call

2010-08-23 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Hi, Running Asterisk 1.6.2.11 and wondering what would be the best way to send an email when a missed call has occurred ? I believe you can modify [stdexten] is this still the case in V1.6 ? -- Thanks, Phil -- _ -- Bandwidth

[asterisk-users] DAHDI not detecting caller hangup

2010-08-23 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Hi, Odd problem have just noticed in that when I call into the PBX DAHDI detects the call and hands it off to the extension, if I then hang up it still continues to process through the dialplan. This is what I have in chan_dahdi.conf: [channels] language=en echocancel=yes usecallerid=yes

[asterisk-users] All phones ringing when temporary loss of Internet

2010-08-23 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Hi, This is a real strange one and trying to phantom it out. One of our clients is connected to our Asterisk installation, from two sites, via VPN which works great. Every so often one of the sites VPN tunnel goes does for say a couple of seconds. When that happens all the extensions,

[asterisk-users] OT: Grandstream GXV3140

2010-08-06 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Hi, Do any of you have these phones ? How have you found it ? Are you using them over WiFi or hard wired ? Does it play nicely with Asterisk ? Need to replace my Snom M3s and this phone maybe a contender. -- Thanks, Phil --

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: Grandstream GXV3140

2010-08-06 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote: Hi, Do any of you have these phones ? How have you found it ? Are you using them over WiFi or hard wired ? Does it play nicely with Asterisk ? Need to replace my Snom M3s and this phone maybe a contender

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP response 482 Loop Detected

2010-07-06 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - - Original Message - On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 4:20 AM, --[ UxBoD ]-- ux...@splatnix.net wrote: - Original Message - Hi, We have tried upgrading from 1.6.1.14 to 1.6.2.9 and have found that we are unable to URI dial our clients

[asterisk-users] SIP response 482 Loop Detected

2010-07-05 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Hi, We have tried upgrading from 1.6.1.14 to 1.6.2.9 and have found that we are unable to URI dial our clients. We run a multi-tenant server and have set sip.conf to forward calls to a public context based on incoming domain name. This was all working before but not it is complaining of a loop

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP response 482 Loop Detected

2010-07-05 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - Hi, We have tried upgrading from 1.6.1.14 to 1.6.2.9 and have found that we are unable to URI dial our clients. We run a multi-tenant server and have set sip.conf to forward calls to a public context based on incoming domain name. This was all working before

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP response 482 Loop Detected

2010-07-05 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 4:20 AM, --[ UxBoD ]-- ux...@splatnix.net wrote: - Original Message - Hi, We have tried upgrading from 1.6.1.14 to 1.6.2.9 and have found that we are unable to URI dial our clients. We run a multi-tenant server and have

[asterisk-users] OT: Physical SIP phone with inbuilt VPN support

2010-06-18 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Hi, all Would any of you be able to suggest physical SIP phones that support inbuilt VPN capabilities; akin to the Snom 370/870 ? -- Thanks, Phil -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New

Re: [asterisk-users] Small PC to build and run Asterisk

2010-06-14 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
* Skype for Asterisk needs to run on this - so this means x86, right? or x86_64 is fine -- Thanks, Phil -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live

Re: [asterisk-users] Dual Atom mobo - call capacity

2010-06-11 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - On Thu, 10 Jun 2010, Michelle Dupuis wrote: I'm looking for a small formfactor mobo for an install that needs to handle 25 phone sets (no transcoding). I found a new dual atom 1.66GHz mobo - anyone know what kinds of call volume that will handle? On Thu,

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6.2.8 Now Available

2010-06-02 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - The Asterisk Development Team has announced the release of Asterisk 1.6.2.8. This release is available for immediate download at http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk/ Which release will http://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17135 make it into; was

Re: [asterisk-users] DAHDI Help (made a cardinal sin :()

2010-05-29 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - On Friday 28 May 2010 12:50:19 --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote: - Original Message - You're missing this in your chan_dahdi.conf: #include dahdi-channels.conf Hmm, I changed the signalling as per a previous post and now it is okay. Why

[asterisk-users] DAHDI Help (made a cardinal sin :()

2010-05-28 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Looking for some help from the UK please. I backed up all my Asterisk configuration before re-installing the server from 32 - 64 bit. Unfortunately I did not transfer the backup to another machine! I now have a TDM400P that is not picking up the line. Can you see what I have done wrong

Re: [asterisk-users] DAHDI Help (made a cardinal sin :()

2010-05-28 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote: Looking for some help from the UK please. I backed up all my Asterisk configuration before re-installing the server from 32 - 64 bit. Unfortunately I did not transfer the backup to another machine! I now have a TDM400P

Re: [asterisk-users] DAHDI Help (made a cardinal sin :()

2010-05-28 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - On Fri, 28 May 2010, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote: [NON-Text Body part not included] Er, my mailer's obviously struggled to interpret this, however did you do the include and I also have this in /etc/modprobe.d in a file: options wctdm opermode=UK Gordon

Re: [asterisk-users] DAHDI Help (made a cardinal sin :()

2010-05-28 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - - --[ UxBoD ]-- ux...@splatnix.net wrote: /etc/asterisk/chan_dahdi.conf - [channels] language=en usecallerid=yes cidsignalling=v23 sendcalleridafter = 2 rxgain=2.0 txgain=3.0 progzone=uk signalling=fxo_ks callerid

Re: [asterisk-users] is my PHPAGI Soap code right?

2010-05-17 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - 2010/5/14 --[ UxBoD ]-- ux...@splatnix.net: - Original Message - Hello, i try to use soap in the phpagi. i want to call a function from a web service when a user call a telephne failed. this is my phpagi script, Could you show me what's wrong

Re: [asterisk-users] is my PHPAGI Soap code right?

2010-05-14 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - Hello, i try to use soap in the phpagi. i want to call a function from a web service when a user call a telephne failed. this is my phpagi script, Could you show me what's wrong ? becasue i can't excute it successfully. please open the following url to

Re: [asterisk-users] Interesting email project.

2010-05-04 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - mike mosier wrote: Hey all. My boss asked me to implement the following When DID 713xxx is dialed send an email to mmos...@xxx.com mailto:mmos...@xxx.com. with the time date and CID included in the email. I know how to code some but am looking for

Re: [asterisk-users] Being attacked by an Amazon EC2 ...

2010-05-01 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - Randy- On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Steve Murphy m...@parsetree.com wrote: Assuming that every such spamming/hacking/attack site is funded on a stolen identity/CC number, it will soon sink into Amazon that they are getting a bad rep, and losing money

Re: [asterisk-users] Being attacked by an Amazon EC2 ...

2010-04-13 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - Think we need some solution WITHIN the Asterisk core. Roderick A. suggested something that looks nice using iptables, some others have pointed out using RBL or fail2ban, but the best would be to have some generic solution not dependant on third party programs.

Re: [asterisk-users] Being attacked by an Amazon EC2 ...

2010-04-13 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - On Tue, 13 Apr 2010, Alyed wrote: Think we need some solution WITHIN the Asterisk core. Roderick A. suggested something that looks nice using iptables, some others have pointed out using RBL or fail2ban, but the best would be to have some generic solution

Re: [asterisk-users] Being attacked by an Amazon EC2 ...

2010-04-13 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - Speaking of all these attacks, are there any good web managed security monitor tools for CentOS out there that can be installed on the system so that it can give us a visual of let's multiple failed attempts against SSH or HTTPd? Something nice that is simple

Re: [asterisk-users] Being attacked by an Amazon EC2 ...

2010-04-13 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
, --[ UxBoD ]-- ux...@splatnix.net wrote: - Original Message - Speaking of all these attacks, are there any good web managed security monitor tools for CentOS out there that can be installed on the system so that it can give us a visual of let's multiple failed attempts against

Re: [asterisk-users] Being attacked by an Amazon EC2 ...

2010-04-12 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - Am 11.04.2010 17:05, schrieb Mark Smith: Same this end from 184.73.17.150. Use this little piece of iptables magic to block the whole of Amazon's EC2 ip- range. iptables -F iptables -A INPUT -m iprange --src-range 216.182.224.0-216.182.239.255 -j DROP

Re: [asterisk-users] Being attacked by an Amazon EC2 ...

2010-04-12 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
- Original Message - On 04/12/2010 12:05 PM, Randy R wrote: On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Darrick Hartman dhart...@djhsolutions.com wrote: I don't think anyone else brought up the Spamhaus DROP project. It's a blacklist of IP addresses and address ranges which are known to

  1   2   3   >