All;
I have a few customers that do a lot of faxing, both inbound and
outbound. Some use the Spandsp and some use the Digium FFA modules. What I
would like to do is when an outbound fax fails, determine whether the remote
end was a fax machine or a plain old phone. I would also like to
On May 20, 2011, at 3:30 PM, Anthony Messina wrote:
On 05/20/2011 01:20 PM, e...@erols.com wrote:
#1) We would like to use Fax For Asterisk with asterisk 1.8.4 in order to
receive faxes via T.38. Sending faxes is not a requirement. Does anyone
have a working asterisk 1.8.4 configuration
, 2011 2:08 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Faxing with Asterisk 1.8.4 T.38
On May 20, 2011, at 3:30 PM, Anthony Messina wrote:
On 05/20/2011 01:20 PM, e...@erols.com wrote:
#1) We would like to use
On 05/24/2011 01:07 PM, e...@erols.com wrote:
I have tried faxing to the DID from 2 different fax machines connected to
different POTS lines. One fax machine is a Xerox Workcentre, and the other
is a Brother Intellifax. Can you provide some more information about your
setup? If you
Hi -
I am looking for suggestions for ITSPs for faxing with asterisk 1.8. We are
based in the US, so would need an ITSP with US DIDs.
#1) We would like to use Fax For Asterisk with asterisk 1.8.4 in order to
receive faxes via T.38. Sending faxes is not a requirement. Does anyone have
a
On 05/20/2011 01:20 PM, e...@erols.com wrote:
#1) We would like to use Fax For Asterisk with asterisk 1.8.4 in order to
receive faxes via T.38. Sending faxes is not a requirement. Does anyone
have a working asterisk 1.8.4 configuration and ITSP provider that they can
recommend? We have
At 23:36 1/17/2010, Doug wrote:
At 09:12 1/17/2010, Steve Underwood wrote:
spandsp follows the normal default behaviour for application using the
autotools, but this behaviour can be a nuisance for some people. By
default it puts the library in /usr/local when you do a make install. On
At 23:04 1/16/2010, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
That's incorrect. module show shows only those modules which are currently
loaded. BTW, there is also the command module show like fax, which is much
easier than typing out the whole module name, may show you more modules than
you were aware of,
Hallo there!
I had my own experience get RxFax/TxFax successful running with spandsp.
I only got spandsp-0.0.4 running, because on newer package, there aren't
created some needed libraries (don't remember the right one this moment)
*find /usr -iname \*spandsp\** shows me following output:
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 11:10:25AM +0100, IT-Connect wrote:
Hallo there!
I had my own experience get RxFax/TxFax successful running with spandsp.
I only got spandsp-0.0.4 running, because on newer package, there aren't
created some needed libraries (don't remember the right one this moment)
Am 17.01.2010 11:28, schrieb Tzafrir Cohen:
What is the output of:
ls -l /usr/lib/libspandsp.so*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 18. Sep 19:40 /usr/lib/libspandsp.so -
libspandsp.so.0.0.2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 18. Sep 19:40 /usr/lib/libspandsp.so.0 -
libspandsp.so.0.0.2
I accidentally answered someone else. So here goes again:
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 02:11:17AM -0600, Doug wrote:
[Jan 17 01:28:16] NOTICE[2479] loader.c: 145 modules will be loaded.
[Jan 17 01:28:16] WARNING[2479] loader.c: Error loading module
'app_fax.so': libspandsp.so.2: cannot open
On 01/17/2010 06:10 PM, IT-Connect wrote:
Hallo there!
I had my own experience get RxFax/TxFax successful running with spandsp.
I only got spandsp-0.0.4 running, because on newer package, there
aren't created some needed libraries (don't remember the right one
this moment)
Spandsp only
On 01/17/2010 04:11 PM, Doug wrote:
At 23:04 1/16/2010, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
That's incorrect. module show shows only those modules which are
currently
loaded. BTW, there is also the command module show like fax, which is
much
easier than typing out the whole module name, may
At 04:28 1/17/2010, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 11:10:25AM +0100, IT-Connect wrote:
Hallo there!
I had my own experience get RxFax/TxFax successful running with spandsp.
I only got spandsp-0.0.4 running, because on newer package, there aren't
created some needed libraries
At 09:12 1/17/2010, Steve Underwood wrote:
spandsp follows the normal default behaviour for application using the
autotools, but this behaviour can be a nuisance for some people. By
default it puts the library in /usr/local when you do a make install. On
many machines this directory exists,
app_fax.c from:
https://agx-ast-addons.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/agx-ast-addons/trun
k/app-spandsp/
Compiled OK:
/usr/src/asterisk/app_fax# ls -lta app_fax.*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 28869 Jan 13 00:25 app_fax.so
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 25242 Jan 13 00:24 app_fax.c
Copied
Doug wrote:
app_fax.c from:
https://agx-ast-addons.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/agx-ast-addons/trun
k/app-spandsp/
Compiled OK:
/usr/src/asterisk/app_fax# ls -lta app_fax.*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 28869 Jan 13 00:25 app_fax.so
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 25242 Jan 13 00:24
http://cloudsconnected.com/?p=57
On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 03:20 -0600, Doug wrote:
app_fax.c from:
https://agx-ast-addons.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/agx-ast-addons/trun
k/app-spandsp/
Compiled OK:
/usr/src/asterisk/app_fax# ls -lta app_fax.*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 28869
Hello Kevin All ,
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Doug wrote:
app_fax.c from:
https://agx-ast-addons.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/agx-ast-addons/trun
k/app-spandsp/
Compiled OK:
/usr/src/asterisk/app_fax# ls -lta app_fax.*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 28869 Jan 13
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Mr. James W. Laferriere
bab...@baby-dragons.com wrote:
Hello Kevin All ,
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Doug wrote:
app_fax.c from:
https://agx-ast-addons.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/agx-ast-addons/trun
k/app-spandsp/
Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
Kevin , Sometimes your about as helpful as passing wind .
Thanks!
How about telling him howto determine if Asterisk has loaded the module
successfully ?
Users of Asterisk should be able to type 'help' at the Asterisk console
prompt, or do Google
On Jan 16, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote: [snip]
Kevin , Sometimes your about as helpful as passing wind .
Hmmm... I do find passing wind to be quite helpful sometimes. Afraid I lost the
reference.
---fred
--
Hello Kevin ( All) ,
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
Kevin , Sometimes your about as helpful as passing wind .
Thanks!
Like I said the response just rubbed me wrong , Sorry .
How about telling him howto determine if
On Saturday 16 January 2010 14:23:16 Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
Here's something that would be good a 'module show loaded' command
showing the user the successfully loaded moduels !?
You mean like 'module
At 23:52 1/10/2010, Doug wrote:
At 15:33 1/7/2010, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 12:50:03AM -0600, Doug wrote:
At 00:22 1/7/2010, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 11:41:54PM -0600, Doug wrote:
At 16:49 1/5/2010, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05,
At 15:33 1/7/2010, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 12:50:03AM -0600, Doug wrote:
At 00:22 1/7/2010, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 11:41:54PM -0600, Doug wrote:
At 16:49 1/5/2010, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 04:24:37PM -0600, Doug wrote:
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steve
Underwood
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 8:55 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Faxing: Anyone have a compiled executable
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 8:59 AM, William Stillwell (Lists)
william.stillwell-li...@ablebody.net wrote:
This is what I was using at the time:
asterisk-1.4.21.2
I really, really prefer the faxing in 1.6. It's so nice to configure
compared to 1.4. I'll leave it to the ChangeLog and anybody else
On a well set up system you should be able to send or receive those
pages all day. If you can't, you probably have timing issues in your
Asterisk setup.
This is a uncleared question. What does timing issue exactly mean?
1) Enable internal timing and use one of the res_timing_*.so (with
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Faxing: Anyone have a compiled executable?
On a well set up system you should be able to send or receive those
pages all day. If you can't, you probably have timing issues in your
Asterisk setup
-users] Faxing: Anyone have a compiled executable?
On a well set up system you should be able to send or receive those
pages all day. If you can't, you probably have timing issues in your
Asterisk setup.
This is a uncleared question. What does timing issue exactly mean?
1) Enable internal timing
...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kristijan
Vrban
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 5:00 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Faxing: Anyone have a compiled executable?
yeah, but what about
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 12:50:03AM -0600, Doug wrote:
At 00:22 1/7/2010, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 11:41:54PM -0600, Doug wrote:
At 16:49 1/5/2010, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 04:24:37PM -0600, Doug wrote:
Hi,
Having problems with
, January 07, 2010 4:33 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Faxing: Anyone have a compiled executable?
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 12:50:03AM -0600, Doug wrote:
At 00:22 1/7/2010, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 11:41:54PM -0600, Doug wrote:
At 16:49 1/5
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 05:05:09PM -0500, William Stillwell (Lists) wrote:
Has there been any improvement with app_fax ?
Builds with spandsp 0.0.6 (as opposed to older versions that required
older versions of spandsp).
It is also a more well-behaving Asterisk app in its logging (does not
keep
On 01/08/2010 06:05 AM, William Stillwell (Lists) wrote:
Has there been any improvement with app_fax ?
I stopped using it as I had a high failure rate with inbound faxes (10%+)
1000 faxes a week ,with over a 100 failures can get quite annoying from
people complaining.. I could get it to fail
At 16:49 1/5/2010, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 04:24:37PM -0600, Doug wrote:
Hi,
Having problems with getting either RxFax or FaxReceive
to compile. Running Asterisk 1.4 on CentOS 5.
What version of SpanDSP do you use?
spandsp-0.0.6pre12.tgz
and:
-Commercial Discussion
Asunto: Re: [asterisk-users] Faxing: Anyone have a compiled executable?
Enviado: 7 Ene, 2010 01:41
At 16:49 1/5/2010, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 04:24:37PM -0600, Doug wrote:
Hi,
Having problems with getting either RxFax or FaxReceive
to compile. Running
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 11:41:54PM -0600, Doug wrote:
At 16:49 1/5/2010, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 04:24:37PM -0600, Doug wrote:
Hi,
Having problems with getting either RxFax or FaxReceive
to compile. Running Asterisk 1.4 on CentOS 5.
What version of SpanDSP
At 00:22 1/7/2010, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 11:41:54PM -0600, Doug wrote:
At 16:49 1/5/2010, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 04:24:37PM -0600, Doug wrote:
Hi,
Having problems with getting either RxFax or FaxReceive
to compile. Running
Hi,
Having problems with getting either RxFax or FaxReceive
to compile. Running Asterisk 1.4 on CentOS 5.
Does anyone have the free/open source executables
that you could send me?
Thanks for your help!
P. S.: TxFax and FaxSend would also be appreciated.
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 04:24:37PM -0600, Doug wrote:
Hi,
Having problems with getting either RxFax or FaxReceive
to compile. Running Asterisk 1.4 on CentOS 5.
What version of SpanDSP do you use?
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755 jabber:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
Jason Aarons (US) wrote:
Anyone have a customer sending/receiving multi-page faxes over Verizon
Business SIP trunk/g711 ?
Verizon Business indicates they don’t support it, and I have 2 recent
customers that it doesn’t work for, and 1 current large customer
telling me he’s going to make
Anyone have a customer sending/receiving multi-page faxes over Verizon
Business SIP trunk/g711 ?
Verizon Business indicates they don't support it, and I have 2 recent
customers that it doesn't work for, and 1 current large customer telling
me he's going to make it work grin.
The issues is
What's the bets way to verify T.38 is being used on both incoming an
outgoing transaction?
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Lee Howard fax...@howardsilvan.com wrote:
Todd S wrote:
Our call path is Sip trunk from MAX TNT - Asterisk - T1 - Adtran
endpoint converting sip trunk to copper line
Todd S aster...@myzionetworks.com writes:
What's the bets way to verify T.38 is being used on both incoming an
outgoing transaction?
I don't know about best, but there's sip set debug ip whatever, or my
personal favourite:
tcpdump -s0 -vnieth0 udp
You can easily tell if t38 is used because
Todd S wrote:
What's the bets way to verify T.38 is being used on both incoming an
outgoing transaction?
3 to 1 in favour of not working. ;)
PaulH
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
We seem to be having a good bit of issues sending faxes and can't pinpoint
the issue. I'm hoping someone here may have a different outlook on the
issue that leads to a resolution.
Our call path is Sip trunk from MAX TNT - Asterisk - T1 - Adtran endpoint
converting sip trunk to copper line for
Todd S wrote:
Our call path is Sip trunk from MAX TNT - Asterisk - T1 - Adtran
endpoint converting sip trunk to copper line for house wiring.
Users at the endpoint can receive faxes without a problem. However,
sending faxes are not so friendly. 1 out of 5 faxes will send
D Tucny wrote:
2009/4/22 Michael mich...@networkstuff.co.nz
mailto:mich...@networkstuff.co.nz
I use GPL Ghostscript 8.6.2 to produce the TIFF files for faxing.
Does anyone know of a way, either while producing the file, or
after, to tell
how many pages have been produced?
I use GPL Ghostscript 8.6.2 to produce the TIFF files for faxing.
Does anyone know of a way, either while producing the file, or after, to tell
how many pages have been produced? (without manually viewing the file)
Michael
___
-- Bandwidth and
2009/4/22 Michael mich...@networkstuff.co.nz
I use GPL Ghostscript 8.6.2 to produce the TIFF files for faxing.
Does anyone know of a way, either while producing the file, or after, to
tell
how many pages have been produced? (without manually viewing the file)
tiffinfo? then count the
Thank you, Doug, for precious information.
Best regards,
Marco Signorini.
===
INGEGNI Tech S.r.l.
http://www.ingegnitech.com
Doug Lytle wrote:
Main fax server:
Mandriva 2008.1
Kernel 2.6.24.5 (Compiled for source)
(1) Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz
Digium TE110P (23
2009/3/8 Marco marcota...@libero.it
Hi List,
I've been using PSTN-ATA + Asterisk + IAXModem + Hylafax since three years
on my lab test setup and I appreciate it. Moreover the global quantity of
fax handled by this setup is not very high.
I'll be involved in a more complex system for a
Hi Gordon, thank you for your answer.
It's not mandatory to use an external box to handle the PRI. I was
thinking to use a Patton device instead of a TE120P just because I would
like to be able to switch to T38 in the near future or if working with
inband faxes will reveal problems.
I'm open to
Marco Signorini wrote:
Analyzing your answers, seems that fax handling is still today
problematic with IAXModem and Hylafax... or I'm wrong?
I would strongly disagree with this statement.
I'm running 3 systems. All 3 are PRI/iaxmodem/HylaFAX+. I may see a
failure maybe once every other
Marco Signorini wrote:
Analyzing your answers, seems that fax handling is still today
problematic with IAXModem and Hylafax... or I'm wrong?
A single server that I administer, receiving 12,000 pages and sending
1,000 pages daily would seem to contradict your conclusions.
Thanks,
Lee.
Marco Signorini wrote:
Hi Gordon, thank you for your answer.
It's not mandatory to use an external box to handle the PRI. I was
thinking to use a Patton device instead of a TE120P just because I would
like to be able to switch to T38 in the near future or if working with
inband faxes will
Thanks Doug and Lee,
your testimonials are changing my opinion :-)
Can you provide some details about your setup? What PRI solution are you
using? And what version of Asterisk, IAXModem, SpanDSP?
Thank you and best regards,
Marco Signorini
===
INGEGNI Tech S.r.l.
Hi Steve,
I was waiting for your answer :-P
I started to use your SpanDSP library since some years ago but,
unfortunately, my experience was only related to lab or personal use
and/or systems with PSTN or BRI cards and low fax volume where it's
impossible to have valid statistics.
I read the
Marco Signorini wrote:
Thanks Doug and Lee,
your testimonials are changing my opinion :-)
Can you provide some details about your setup? What PRI solution are you
using? And what version of Asterisk, IAXModem, SpanDSP?
Main fax server:
Mandriva 2008.1
Kernel 2.6.24.5 (Compiled for
Hi List,
I've been using PSTN-ATA + Asterisk + IAXModem + Hylafax since three years
on my lab test setup and I appreciate it. Moreover the global quantity of
fax handled by this setup is not very high.
I'll be involved in a more complex system for a customer and I would like
to ask to All of you
Here is my current setup:
E1 = [Asterisk with TE220p] = IAX Trunk (routed network) =
[Asterisk with TDM800p] = Fax/Copy Machine
This seems to work fine, a few failed Fax or very slow sending/process
sometimes but no complaining
users, so this must be ok :)
My previous try was:
E1 =
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, Marco wrote:
Hi List,
I've been using PSTN-ATA + Asterisk + IAXModem + Hylafax since three years
on my lab test setup and I appreciate it. Moreover the global quantity of
fax handled by this setup is not very high.
I'll be involved in a more complex system for a customer
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, benoit wrote:
Here is my current setup:
E1 = [Asterisk with TE220p] = IAX Trunk (routed network) =
[Asterisk with TDM800p] = Fax/Copy Machine
The TE220P and the TDM800P are in different Asterisk boxes? Any particular
reason for that? I now have an E1 coming in to
Remco Barendse a écrit :
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, benoit wrote:
Here is my current setup:
E1 = [Asterisk with TE220p] = IAX Trunk (routed network) =
[Asterisk with TDM800p] = Fax/Copy Machine
The TE220P and the TDM800P are in different Asterisk boxes? Any particular
reason for
benoit wrote:
Remco Barendse a écrit :
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, benoit wrote:
Here is my current setup:
E1 = [Asterisk with TE220p] = IAX Trunk (routed network) =
[Asterisk with TDM800p] = Fax/Copy Machine
You'll find that faxing over IAX is problematic at best.
If
Doug Lytle a écrit :
benoit wrote:
Remco Barendse a écrit :
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, benoit wrote:
Here is my current setup:
E1 = [Asterisk with TE220p] = IAX Trunk (routed network) =
[Asterisk with TDM800p] = Fax/Copy Machine
My recommendation would be to stay away from VoIP even T.38 whenever possible.
That said yout best option is to use TDM, for that you can either use
1 single span T/E1 from digium and an analog TDM card for FXS.
Or you could uee a dual span T/E1 card and a channel bank with FXS
ports. While the
When I said to stay away from VoIP I meant when it comes to faxing.
On 3/8/09, C F shma...@gmail.com wrote:
My recommendation would be to stay away from VoIP even T.38 whenever
possible.
That said yout best option is to use TDM, for that you can either use
1 single span T/E1 from digium and
Faxing over IAX locally works fine.
--
Sent from mobile device
On Mar 8, 2009, at 8:46 AM, Doug Lytle supp...@drdos.info wrote:
benoit wrote:
Remco Barendse a écrit :
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, benoit wrote:
Here is my current setup:
E1 = [Asterisk with TE220p] = IAX Trunk (routed network)
Wednesday, March 4, 2009, 5:43:13 PM, Joseph wrote:
On 03/04/09 15:56, Gergo Csibra wrote:
Wednesday, March 4, 2009, 3:22:59 PM, Joseph wrote:
FAX Passthru Codec: G711u
for me FAX works better with G711a
Can you folks compare my setting below with your settings and let me know if
On 03/04/09 19:31, Michael wrote:
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:25:38 Joseph wrote:
I'm faxing from stand alone fax machine via linksys SPA3102 but most of
the time only half or quarter page goes through.
Did anybody have any experience like this?
Should be obvious but does your up line SIP
On 03/04/09 19:31, Michael wrote:
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:25:38 Joseph wrote:
I'm faxing from stand alone fax machine via linksys SPA3102 but most of
the time only half or quarter page goes through.
Did anybody have any experience like this?
Should be obvious but does your up line SIP
...@networkstuff.co.nz; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] faxing via linksys SPA3102 half pagegoes
through
On 03/04/09 19:31, Michael wrote:
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:25:38 Joseph wrote:
I'm faxing from stand alone fax machine via linksys SPA3102
Hi Joseph.
I've spent some time tuning the SPA3102 FXS line input and output gain
and I think that this is an important variable.
Let's try to record incoming and outgoing fax tones with asterisk on SIP
channel (disabling the fax detection on SPA and sending fax inband) and
look at the recorded
On 03/04/09 08:38, Danny Nicholas wrote:
What app are you using to receive the fax? If it is RXFAX, try turning on
the ECM and or DEBUG options.
It is a stand alone fax machine.
Receiving faxes works OK, only when I try to send a fax it cuts it off.
I know the problem is setting on Linksys
Wednesday, March 4, 2009, 3:22:59 PM, Joseph wrote:
FAX Passthru Codec: G711u
for me FAX works better with G711a
--
Best regards,
Gergomailto:csi...@gmail.com
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
On 03/04/09 15:56, Gergo Csibra wrote:
Wednesday, March 4, 2009, 3:22:59 PM, Joseph wrote:
FAX Passthru Codec: G711u
for me FAX works better with G711a
Can you folks compare my setting below with your settings and let me know if
something differ.
I was experimenting with echo in the past and
On 03/04/09 15:44, Marco Signorini wrote:
Hi Joseph.
I've spent some time tuning the SPA3102 FXS line input and output gain
and I think that this is an important variable.
Let's try to record incoming and outgoing fax tones with asterisk on SIP
channel (disabling the fax detection on SPA and
Joseph wrote:
On 03/04/09 15:44, Marco Signorini wrote:
Hi Joseph.
I've spent some time tuning the SPA3102 FXS line input and output gain
and I think that this is an important variable.
Let's try to record incoming and outgoing fax tones with asterisk on SIP
channel (disabling the fax
On 03/04/09 18:01, Marco Signorini wrote:
Joseph wrote:
As I remember I have experimented with gain on PSTN line as well but have
reset back to default.
I have:
SPA To PSTN Gain:0
PSTN To SPA Gain:0
I think 0 is the default.
Yes, 0 is the default.
Is the fax machine connected to the
Marco Signorini wrote:
Joseph wrote:
On 03/04/09 15:44, Marco Signorini wrote:
Hi Joseph.
I've spent some time tuning the SPA3102 FXS line input and output gain
and I think that this is an important variable.
Let's try to record incoming and outgoing fax tones with asterisk on
I'm faxing from stand alone fax machine via linksys SPA3102 but most of the
time only half or quarter page goes through.
Did anybody have any experience like this?
--
#Joseph
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:25:38 Joseph wrote:
I'm faxing from stand alone fax machine via linksys SPA3102 but most of
the time only half or quarter page goes through.
Did anybody have any experience like this?
Should be obvious but does your up line SIP provide support T.38?
Hi All,
I need to setup asterisk to receive fax.
I'm try Spandsp (opensource) and Attrafax (commercial) both on
asterisk 1.4.23) but the results are disappointing.
with spandsp many times the fax arrives cut.
with Attrafax i have some problem.
Anyone have any idea or solution (Opensource or
2009/2/16 Fabio Mosti fmo...@gmail.com
Hi All,
I need to setup asterisk to receive fax.
I'm try Spandsp (opensource) and Attrafax (commercial) both on
asterisk 1.4.23) but the results are disappointing.
with spandsp many times the fax arrives cut.
with Attrafax i have some problem.
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:14:49 Fabio Mosti wrote:
Hi All,
I need to setup asterisk to receive fax.
I'm try Spandsp (opensource) and Attrafax (commercial) both on
asterisk 1.4.23) but the results are disappointing.
with spandsp many times the fax arrives cut.
with Attrafax i have some
Anyone have any idea or solution (Opensource or commercial) to suggest me
?
Best Regards
Try hylafax with IAXmodem. The best results i had it the multitech modems
directly connected to FXS PCI card, you have a nice web interface if you
wish also (avantfax) You can find some nice
2009/2/16 Michael mich...@networkstuff.co.nz
Anyone have any idea or solution (Opensource or commercial) to suggest
me
?
Best Regards
Try hylafax with IAXmodem. The best results i had it the multitech
modems
directly connected to FXS PCI card, you have a nice web
2009/2/16 Grygoriy Dobrovolskyy megaho...@gmail.com
2009/2/16 Michael mich...@networkstuff.co.nz
Anyone have any idea or solution (Opensource or commercial) to suggest
me
?
Best Regards
Try hylafax with IAXmodem. The best results i had it the multitech
modems
directly
Fabio Mosti wrote:
Hi All,
I need to setup asterisk to receive fax.
I'm try Spandsp (opensource) and Attrafax (commercial) both on
asterisk 1.4.23) but the results are disappointing.
with spandsp many times the fax arrives cut.
with Attrafax i have some problem.
Anyone have any idea or
Steve Underwood wrote:
Fabio Mosti wrote:
Hi All,
I need to setup asterisk to receive fax.
I'm try Spandsp (opensource) and Attrafax (commercial) both on
asterisk 1.4.23) but the results are disappointing.
with spandsp many times the fax arrives cut.
with Attrafax i have some problem.
2009/2/16 Steve Underwood ste...@coppice.org:
You don't indicate the kind of setup you are using.
I use asterisk (Spandsp) with a IAX2 trunk (ethernet connection) to
another asterisk (zap).
client-asterisk (Spandsp)-asterisk (zap)-fax
Regards,
Steve
Best Regards,
Fabio
Fabio Mosti wrote:
I use asterisk (Spandsp) with a IAX2 trunk (ethernet connection) to
another asterisk (zap).
client-asterisk (Spandsp)-asterisk (zap)-fax
We have two remote phone systems connected via IAX and 1 fax server at
the corporate offices with a PRI (ZAP). The fax server and
Fabio Mosti wrote:
2009/2/16 Steve Underwood ste...@coppice.org:
You don't indicate the kind of setup you are using.
I use asterisk (Spandsp) with a IAX2 trunk (ethernet connection) to
another asterisk (zap).
client-asterisk (Spandsp)-asterisk (zap)-fax
To quote the
The Attrafax software that was mentioned at the beginning of the thread does
support Gateway mode.
Regards,
Marc
-Original Message-
Fabio Mosti wrote:
2009/2/16 Steve Underwood ste...@coppice.org:
You don't indicate the kind of setup you are using.
I use asterisk
.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 14:11:06 -0500
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Faxing through Zap cards
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 11:38:17 -0500, James Sneeringer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 1:45 AM, C F [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 11:38:17 -0500, James Sneeringer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 1:45 AM, C F [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, in the beginning you asked because you don't have the experience
so folks like myself that do have the experience answered. It might
work for you, no
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo
