I installed the Vestec system and am testing out using it to get strings of
digits (e.g. conference numbers). The sample grammer just allows saying
zero, but almost everybody will read it it oh. But when I try to
add that as an alternative in the grammer (either the word oh or
phonetically as
...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Richard Kenner
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 2:40 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] Digits and Vestec
I installed the Vestec system and am testing out using it to get strings of
digits (e.g
This one works on my box (Vestec on 1.4.30 on OpenSuse)
Hmm... Not for me.
$Digit = (ONE:1 |
TWO:2 |
THREE:3 |
FOUR:4 |
FIVE:5 |
SIX:6 |
SEVEN:7 |
EIGHT:8 |
NINE:9 |
(OH|ZERO):0);
This is basically the first thing I tried. At least for my voice, this
gets whole lot of spurious 0's.
Make it say 'zed'.
It will make the British happy, and cause a different kind of
confusion for the Americans.
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Richard Kenner ken...@gnat.com wrote:
This one works on my box (Vestec on 1.4.30 on OpenSuse)
Hmm... Not for me.
$Digit = (ONE:1 |
TWO:2 |
THREE:3
Ummm, zed is z.
I was thinking of nought.
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 8:39 PM, David Backeberg dbackeb...@gmail.com wrote:
Make it say 'zed'.
It will make the British happy, and cause a different kind of
confusion for the Americans.
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Richard Kenner ken...@gnat.com
I'm pretty sure you want it to say naught to make the british happy, for
zero anyway...
j
On Tue, 11 May 2010, David Backeberg wrote:
Make it say 'zed'.
It will make the British happy, and cause a different kind of
confusion for the Americans.
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Richard
